Reply to post: Re: "legally binding fiduciary duty"

Five reasons why the Google tax deal is imploding

Uffish

Re: "legally binding fiduciary duty"

@ Lysenko, is "legally binding fiduciary duty to maximise profits" the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth ?

If it is, then the law needs changing.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019