Reply to post: RISCy?

Long-memoried boffins re-invent 1950s ferroelectric tech

Mike 16

RISCy?

Not sure why you would consider the NOVA to be "not a RISC". Decently orthogonal instruction set, fixed (well, two possible lengths IIRC, but could be thinking of later members of the family) instruction length, predictable (and deducible) instruction execution times, at most one operand changed per instruction...

As for Ferroeletric memory, I recall seeing a photo of a prototype from Bell Labs, back in the 1960s. It was only the substrate and metalization, with off-board drivers, but had either 64 (8x8) or 256 (16x16) sites. Again, I don't recall. But, yeah it has been possible to buy FRAM for quite a while. Just as it's still possible to find "bubble memory", although IBM calls the on-chip version "racetrack", and NCR's Thin-film memory has a new on-chip incarnation whose name and sponsor I can also not recall at the moment . Perhaps I need a new memory.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon