Reply to post: Re: GIMP is, or at least has been enough of a match for most of what PhotoShop did

Microsoft will explain only 'significant' Windows 10 updates

jelabarre59 Silver badge

Re: GIMP is, or at least has been enough of a match for most of what PhotoShop did

The problem with the "Photoshop vs Gimp" argument is that Gimp is likely adequate for what a large numbers of users need it for. If you're a professional illustrator, or perhaps even one of those clipart-wranglers that likes to pass themselves off as a graphic designer, then yes, you most likely need Photoshop. But if you're at that level of professional usage, you should probably be using a Macintosh anyway (which this precludes another MSWin/Photoshop user).

A large percentage of Photoshop users just don't need all that power. It's like those folks who have a Hummer (or Range Rover, I guess, for those of you in the UK) to drive 2 blocks to the local Starsucks for a foamy latte. Complete waste of money and horsepower.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019