Reply to post: Re: 4k is ridiculous for video at current frame rates

Budget UHD TVs arrive – but were the 4Kasts worth listening to?

Alan Brown Silver badge

Re: 4k is ridiculous for video at current frame rates

" Panning an image across the screen one pixel per displayed frame at 50Hz will take 77 seconds."

Which is why frame rate is as important for TV/movie work as resolution. There's a solid push to take UHD to 144 or 320Hz in the long-term - or move away from rasterisation altogether.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019