Reply to post: Re: "a brave person who said that HRA has no audible benefits"

Hi-res audio folk to introduce new rules and weed out impure noises

John Robson Silver badge

Re: "a brave person who said that HRA has no audible benefits"

@ Neil Barnes

The reason we run at -18dBFS as our "new zero" is for recording headroom - there is no reason to leave it there when we export the finished article.

So that's 12 bits you can add back on.

The 11 bits for dither noise - I rather suspect that is not true.

On the basis that a guassian dither will allow you to hear a tone at well underneath a single bit of amplitude, albeit with some noise, I struggle to believe that a sane dither would *lose* 11dB of resolution.

There are *extremely* good reasons to oversample as part of the DAC (it makes the analogue side filters much easier for instance) and very good reasons to use higher bit depths (it provides an excellent noise floor and headroom when recording) - but for the product, CD quality is way past most of our hearing capacity...

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019