Re: 2.2 meelion dollars
It's america -- I'm puzzled why they didn't fire both workers who are presumably employed 'at will'?
Clearly both were 'suspicious' enough for management, so firing them would be cheaper than a dna test? I don't get the economics. The narrative would be it's the fouler's fault, if he'd confessed his mate'd be employed still... (nevermind fouler may be a third party).
Biting the hand that feeds IT
