You're right, Dawkins' few on-record encounters with disbelievers have not gone well at all - for him. He's a clueless bumbler who consistently spouts provably downright rubbish mixed with a pile of unfalsifiable just so stories. Still, it keeps the faithful/less believing - mostly because they're incapable of actually reading the literature produced by scientists with an opposing view. Ridicule and dismissal is easier...
Biting the hand that feeds IT
