Reply to post: Re: *Whose* code? @ David Dawson

Ex-Goldman Sachs programmer found guilty of code theft … again

Tom 38

Re: *Whose* code? @ David Dawson

Most people's definition of theft is...

irrelevant - the only definition worth considering is that in law, and that says:

A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it; and “thief” and “steal” shall be construed accordingly.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon