Reply to post: INTENTIONAL HARM BY PUBLIC SHAMING

Woman caught on CCTV performing drunken BJ blew right to privacy

rav

INTENTIONAL HARM BY PUBLIC SHAMING

The video did NOT have to be aired. But it was and it was done intentionally to cause harm through public shaming.

Certainly the video was not aired to benefit the woman in question but rather her indiscretion was used to benefit the production.

She should be at least paid for the use of that video.

I don;t know what lible law is in the UK but in the States libel is based on intent to do harm.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019