Reply to post: Hmmm? Maybe?

UK Supreme Court waves through indiscriminate police surveillance

All names Taken
Paris Hilton

Hmmm? Maybe?

Maybe a better approach is to take action on wasting police time and the cost of making non-intrusive monitoring of people who had not committed any crime nor were they likely to?

Inefficient management of a public resource (police personnel, police time and that ain't cheap, equipment, ...) might mean that those responsible for ordering inappropriate non-intrusive monitoring might have their career paths (and pensions?) cut short?

EDIT

ps: I don't think any reasoned approach will work as the individuals have the power, have the authority and are motived to abuse them anyway?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon