Reply to post: Re: No shit sherlock!

UK Scouts database 'flaws' raise concerns

TallPaul

Re: No shit sherlock!

Quite so, that's the question that I've been asking myself. Historically groups held their own records, on paper. All headquarters required was an annual head count as they charged a capitation fee for providing their services to the groups. Seemed to work out OK for everyone.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019