Reply to post: Re: AC Re: Kiwi AC I assume this was their intention all along... @Matt Bryant

Re: AC Re: Kiwi AC I assume this was their intention all along... @Matt Bryant

"Why should he go to the US if he has never been there?...." Maybe you should try reading the extradition request, it might fill in one of what appears to be many holes in your knowledge.

".....It is aburd to assume that we have go around the world to defend ourselves against any group of people who decide that they have a beef against us....." Really? Yet I bet a 'right-on dude' as you seem to want yourself to be perceived approves of war criminals being extradited to stand trial at The Hague? Oh, and this is not 'a beef', it is a suspected encouragement and collusion in illegal activity under international as well as US laws.

"....Perhaps Matt Bryant should go to a far flung Pacific island...." Well, not New Zealand, thanks. Despite its appeal to many, it strikes me as too much like a bigger Wales, only with more cricket and less cottage burning. If you wish to spring for an all-expenses trip to Fiji I'd consider it, but then I suspect - given what seems to be your support for pirating - your funds might not stretch to cover even a trip to Southend.

".....to hang around for years while his case is processed and he is subjected to arbitrary imprisonment." Nothing arbitrary about it at all. You seem to have missed the bit where Kim Dotdumb was accused of running the World's largest pirate site, would you like some pointers to help you catch up on the whole affair? I would suggest you start Your homework here:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/09/dotcom_rejected_again/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/06/07/mpaa_megaupload_files_returned/

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megaupload_legal_case

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/01/19/kim_dotcom_arrested/ (note the bit about US-based servers)

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Dotcom (includes bits on his prior e-criminal record)