Reply to post: The fault is partly with the law on "indecent images" and pornography

Today's Facebook fury: Coppertone-like baby pic ban baffles US mom

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

The fault is partly with the law on "indecent images" and pornography

>Firstly, that children's bare bottoms may be considered to be pornography,

I thought the law allowed for how the image was being used. For example if I saved this image for what it is, a bit of amusing fun, then there is no problem. However, if I saved it because I think a little girl's bare bum is a sexual object and I might have a quick one off the wrist later on then it's a no-no. I know the police will always go for the latter interpretation but the contents of your image colllection should show how you are likely to interpret the image.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019