Paradoxical
"This [reprimand] didn't happen because of the notoriety of the patient"
The truth is, the reprimand did happen because of the notoriety of the patient, because without the notoriety the information wouldn't have been leaked to the press, and therefore nobody would have been suspected of leaking it, therefore been reprimanded.
Any other instance of snooping wouldn't have led to the investigation as there would have been no suspicion, therefore no notoriety means no reprimand.
To put it another way, they have absolutely no idea who is snooping into what they shouldn't unless the press get wind of something and the hospital must then be held accountable, or hold someone else accountable.
What a lovely logical paradox for a Tuesday afternoon.