Surely he should appologise for being a tacky media whore
I don't get it:
> "I have said all week I'd be the first person in Australia to apologise to
> Pauline Hanson if it were proven the photographs were not of her. We've
> proven it ourselves, so Pauline, I'm sorry."
Shouldn't he be appologising for publishing very old nude pictures of someone taken decades before they entered public life, and completely unrelated to their political aspirations, and absolutely not of news or public interest value?
Shouldn't he be appologising for being a tacky whore? Appologising for being editor of a publication too lazy and greedy to do proper checks? Oh well. C'est la vie su le monde.