Hmmm
Your comments are a complete crock. AMD does NOT "retain control of their systems at all times" Nor does AMD hold any any mystical "Key" which can somehow unlock your system. Good grief. How much does Intel pay for this kind of nonsense.....
AMD, as well as dozens, if not hundreds of independent software/firmware engineers and experts (not to mention hackers the world over) have spent literally thousands, if not 10's of thousands of man hours looking for vulnerabilities in AMD's chips and thus far have found only a couple of minor, easily patched bugs. In contrast, they continue to find massive vulnerabilities in Intel's chips, most of which require massive performance reductions to patch.
More importantly, the fix for the few vulnerabilities found in AMD's chips have already been fixed in their latest Zen 2 7nm process being released in a matter of days. Intel on the other hand, with more than a dozen back doors and vulnerabilities on the books, require the user to literally cripple their performance in order to protect themselves from being hacked. In some cases, the ONLY way to mitigate the threat of being hacked with Intel is to literally disable hyper threading essentially crippling the performance in most end user scenarios.
Furthermore, AMD's Zen 2 is "better" in nearly every major quantifiable performance metric than Intel's offerings. And by Intel's own roadmap, this situation will continue for years. In short, Intel is bleeding market share because it is shipping an inferior product, that costs more to purchase and operate, and is vulnerable to hacking unless you accept a 20-40% performance hit.
As the market continues to shift toward AMD more and more software will be optimized for Zen2-3 increasing the performance gap even more....Intel isn't just wounded and bleeding, it is at the moment, flat on its back.............