Just move the camera back from the exhaust hole. An inch or so should do. You'll get some windowing of the scene when you're fully zoomed out but at full zoom (the likely case - "why is the shop vac five feet away from us?") you'll be in past the edges. Just hope they don't decide to empty the vacuum.
'Say hello to my little vacuum cleaner!' US drug squad puts spycams in cleaner's kit
Next time you're closing a big drug deal you may want to watch the cleaner. Or more specifically their vacuum cleaner. That's right, because thanks to publicly available federal acquisition records we now know that America's Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) has planted cameras in cleaners. Canon cameras in Shop-Vacs appear to be …
COMMENTS
-
-
Friday 7th December 2018 23:09 GMT Tom Paine
Craftsman? Stanley? Pfffffft
It's all about the Festool!
https://www.axminster.co.uk/festool-ctm-26-e-ac-cleantec-dust-extractor-m-class-ax991204
Aka "nah mate, that's not an M class dust extractor... THIS is an M class dust extractor"
Unless you're building a proper general airspace dust extractor, of course, but those can't pass as vacuum cleaners like the Festool can (just).
https://youtu.be/UJQXUbRG-oA
I need a new Axminster catalogue, the pages of this one are all stuck together...
-
Sunday 9th December 2018 20:26 GMT jake
Re: Craftsman? Stanley? Pfffffft
Festool? Garbage marketed at yuppies.
About four years ago I received a $3000 xmas gift certificate for Festool products from a well-meaning in-law. The next spring, I decided to build a new mobile chickenhouse (~100 layers), so I acquired a Festool tracksaw, a
biscuitdomino joiner, a router, a sander and assorted bits & bobs to make using the four "easier". Halfway through the project, all four tools were unusable. Fortunately I had my Skil 77 and etc. to fall back on ...A couple of weeks later, AvE came out with this review.
-
-
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 17:37 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Errr ...
I would be suspicious of any equipment that suddenly showed up.
The point here is that you simply swap out an existing cleaner for an "enhanced" cleaner, when you are doing this sort of operation then you generally try to stay under cover as much as possible. The public documents indicate that they have been putting cameras in street-lights for a while ... if this is what's been released then what do you think is happening behind the scenes?
Many years ago I had a job building microphone radio transmitters and fitting them into matchboxes so that they could be just left behind in a room after a meeting ...
-
Monday 10th December 2018 10:02 GMT Charles Calthrop
Re: Errr ...
You must have hated the smoking ban!. Saying that you don't have to be that subtle these days: I was in a conference room once where the owner of the company came in, left her mobile and notepad on the table and left. Unfortunately, she had unlocked it so we could she she had called in from her office line and we were on speaker. my collegue suddenly and uncharacteristically talked in excrutiating detail about his sex life. Completely coincidentally, the owner came in about a minute later, pretended she'd 'forgotten her mobile', and left, not looking at my colleague once.
-
-
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 01:20 GMT harmjschoonhoven
Hm,
My Nilfisk vacuum cleaners will probably just blow the VB-M50B from their sockets and spit them out.
BTW The Singaporean
governmentdictators will shortly install surveillance cameras with face recognition sitting atop over 100,000 lampposts in the citystate as part of a broader "Smart Nation" plan. -
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 14:32 GMT Pascal Monett
Re: The War on Drugs
Given that the CIA is known to have dabbled in the drug trade in order to fund its black projects, the war on drugs was doomed from the start.
Given that the US had already failed a war on alcohol, you'd think that they'd have got the message, but no.
So, looking forward to a war on porn ? I'm sure it won't be long.
-
Monday 10th December 2018 11:27 GMT Cuddles
Re: The War on Drugs
"Given that the CIA is known to have dabbled in the drug trade in order to fund its black projects, the war on drugs was doomed from the start."
People always bring up the CIA and similar in this context, but they're really not relevant. People have been enjoying drugs for as far back in time as it's possible for us to detect that sort of thing. Alcohol is unsurprisingly the biggest, but you just have to look at how almost every culture has some kind of tradition involving some sort of mind altering substance to see just how fundamental this is. And of course, once you start looking at other animals, you find that pretty much all of them will behave in exactly the same way given half a chance; they're mostly limited simply by the inability to produce said substances themselves rather than all being puritanical teetotals.
The war on drugs was doomed from the start not because of the CIA, but simply because running around shouting at everyone to stop enjoying themselves was just never going to work. Sensible regulations and education are one thing, but trying to enforce a blanket ban on everything is obviously stupid on the face of it. No government black ops required, just basic
humananimal nature.
-
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 17:45 GMT Version 1.0
Re: The War on Drugs
Yes, we've "lost" the War on Drugs but do you think that they ever intended to win it? It rather looks like the idea was to politically profit. These days a large proportion of minority Americans can't vote because they have felony drug convictions and are prohibited from voting - plus the ensuing violence that the War on Drugs generates has shifted a large number of white voters to support the right wing Law And Order politics.
So for some people in power, the War on Drugs has worked out quite well.
-
Monday 10th December 2018 12:23 GMT phuzz
Re: The War on Drugs
"So for some people in power, the War on Drugs has worked out quite well."
Exactly, the War on Drugs hasn't failed, it's succeeded in all the ways it was ever intended to.
It's made money for 'defence' contractors. It's made money for prison owners. It's got votes for hardline politicians, and not coincidentally, it's locked up a lot of black people.
-
-
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 04:40 GMT Chozo
Given the amount of money involved the cartels have probably bugged the DEA & law enforcement in general for years. Alas slim chance of getting any data on that from a FOI request. Whilst at first this appears to be non-story as I have been on fleabay to get cameras that fit inside coat-hooks, shower heads and my shoes.. oh wait However in a paranoid world where the bad-guys are also tech savvy then a listening device that does not broadcast instead having weeks or even months of internal storage capacity makes more sense. The drawback being you need something bulky to hide it in.
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 05:09 GMT IceC0ld
oh wait However in a paranoid world where the bad-guys are also tech savvy then a listening device that does not broadcast instead having weeks or even months of internal storage capacity makes more sense.
The drawback being you need something bulky to hide it in.
==
Like an industrial cleaner perchance ? ............
-
-
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 19:10 GMT 404
Electrolux isn't that great... Had an overbearing mother who believed in biological remote controls, i.e kids. I have experience with Electrolux, Rainbow, Hoover, ShopVac, various commercial appliances, and Kirby machines. The Rainbow was best at dust control with it's water filter trap, ShopVac for vacuuming up water, but the Kirby hands-down wins on suction for everyday household cleaning. Own an Ultimate G Kirby now lol ($200 on craigslist)
I don't know why I wrote that, but it's true.
-
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 10:08 GMT Anonymous Coward
I've always looked at that "Henry Vacuum" face with deep suspicion thinking I'm been watched and now I know it's nothing to do with been paranoid after hoovering up a few fat lines myself.
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 12:23 GMT Sgt_Oddball
I'm pretty sure..
I've seen a video of one these suckers before having fun with the blow(setting?) .
When under cover Henrys go bad
get.coat(pluasableExcuse);
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 14:38 GMT L05ER
Lock em up!
Shop-Vac brand is absolute shit, ANYONE supporting such horribly designed products should be locked up...
also, exhaust port methodology is more flawed than mentioned here... most come with filters and covers that mostly stay in place. As long as you can manage heat... the motor's exhaust slot would be a better bet. Far less chance of someone opening the motor itself, or of it ever being obstructed.
-
Monday 10th December 2018 12:31 GMT phuzz
Re: Lock em up!
I'd always assumed before today that it was a generic name rather than a trademark. It does betray a certain lack of imagination;
"We're going to sell vacuum cleaners for people to use in their workshops, what shall we name our company?"
"How about Shop-vac?"
"Brilliant! Trebles all round!"
-
-
Saturday 8th December 2018 23:16 GMT Danny 2
I am not an imaginary number
In the late '80s I lived in a tiny village, one row of miners' cottages - 102 people, 200ish cats, 50ish dogs.
The village 'council' proposed a development project which would build two new houses, and a car rally track around us plus a motor sports facility on the local reservoir which was a home to migratory birds.
The corrupt head of the local village council had been bribed by the developer to push it through with the promise of a free new luxury home. And she nearly managed it except for some pesky kids bothered by the fact it was a SSSI for migratory birds.
The developer had serious backing, from a Scottish world rally champion plus loads o' money. The turning point was a public meeting when a click in her handbag revealed she was secretly recording everyone on a Walkman.
The moment I heard that click I realised as an electronics guy with shared loft space I could bug every house in the village, and none of them would ever know.
And then I thought about having to listen to my neighbours private conversations, and I appalled myself. It was bad enough having to endure their public conversations. The idea of spying on people was even more repugnant than being spied upon by idiots.
The morality of GCHQ/NSA/Amazon/Google (ad nauseum) employees who feel justified in spying on the rest of us, you are beyond redemption. You are not the same species as the rest of us. You are the one or two percent of psychopaths in our midst, and eventually we will hear your Walkman go click.
-
Sunday 9th December 2018 01:12 GMT shawnfromnh
Well if I was going to do something illegal the first thing is not at home at a location you choose. The other thing would be if at home it'll be in a Faraday cage, cell phones at the front door or in a sound proof box so they can't be used to listen and nothing in the cage except for you and the person you're talking to and the exchange can take place at a place discussed in the cage. There are to many ways to spy electronically that a Faraday Cage is a must for anything including legal business nowadays.
-
Monday 10th December 2018 09:56 GMT Milton
The War on Drugs (by idiots, for idiots) was lost long ago, if you believe its purpose is to combat the illegal drugs trade and reduce social harm. It's rather obviously done the exact opposite. But if its real benefits are the maintenace of a large law-enforcement and security apparatus with huge manpower and budgets (also known as 'means of controlling the population') then it's been a huge success. Behind every self-righteous hypocrite bleating in Congress or Parliament about the scourge of drugs, while fondling those distillers' share certificates in his pocket, lies a government bureaucracy and a hundred little Napoleons just loving their budgets and headcount. It's a form of institutional insanity.
As for the shop-vac, I would guess there was a specific operational environment where (a) significant drug criminality was suspected, and (b) the presence of one or more cleaning devices would have been unremarkable. A large office space, warehouse, institution? This doesn't strike me as a routine procurement of standard issue kit: more like a mission-specific bespoke buy. Look for similar procurements using the same basic idea for different environments. Say ... radio-mics concealed in takeaway food packaging; GPS flares hidden in vapekits; cameras peeking out of innocent-looking wall switches, thermostats, even installed in ceiling lights: your recce team identifies common, harmless looking objects in the operational zone, Q branch ponders awhile, a suit signs off and a procurement request goes out.
PS Why use an existing orifice? The machine pictured looks like its carapace is a black heavy-duty plastic cylinder. So fit a matt-darkened window into a cut-out occupying maybe 30° of the circumference. Disguise it with an innocuous '2,000 Super Sucker Power' sticker (lower, clear half over the window) and you've not only got an unremarkable exterior feature, you have a decent field of pan. Hell, fit out a small production run with the dressing but no cameras, and even the users won't be surprised to see some new go-faster stripes on the rectnyl-delivered Mk17B... the lovely new filter assembly inside, which apparently needs never be opened, explains itself to the curious ... show people a commonplace in keeping with their expectations, they'll never ask a question. (And an industrial vac is heavy enough for no one to notice the extra 8oz of long-endurance battery concealed in the bottom.)
-
Monday 10th December 2018 22:44 GMT Anonymous Coward
50% Mark-up
Clearly the author has never been involved in contracts with the US federal government.
My guess is for a camera costing $3,400 and a vacuum costing a couple of hundred, that $42,595 represents a single unit. If anything, I’m honestly surprised anyone would have done it that cheap.
-
Tuesday 11th December 2018 09:34 GMT Chairman of the Bored
Feeding time!
How to feed the LE troll:
Suppose you happen to know there is a surveillance device in a vac. Get some guys together and start talking about crank.
'Accidentally' bump the vac out of you line of sight and say "hey, guys, I never did push crank. The real money is in selling radioactive IoT connected butt plugs. See? I call this one the dirty bomb...."
Remember... any specific claim on your charging document that is demonstrably false makes it easier for your lawyer to argue the rest is BS