I'd side with Teradata on this one
SAP's contracts, like Oracle's, are about as good a definition of lock-in as you'll come across, which is why so much of them are redacted if they ever get to see the light of day.
SAP is pushing to have a lawsuit from competitor Teradata thrown out for good, arguing the claims are "factually groundless". The suit, which Teradata filed in June, alleged SAP had "lured" it into a joint venture and used that to collate the firm's trade secrets in order to create the SAP HANA data platform. It also made …
I'd side wiith anyone except Teradata having worked with them. Have you tried to work with them? It seems to involve you paying £1/2 million quid for hardware, support, services that you have no idea what to do with and then £5 million on top to learrn what to do wiith the "solution" they sold you.
Utter fuck wit con artists that I never want to deal with again!!!!
I've seen this before, in the late 90's, SAP customers were buying i2 Rhythm supply chain planning software. SAP partnered with i2 to offer direct integration with its PP module then after about a year ended the partnership and launched SAP APO with the same functions and very similar interface as Rhythm SCP.
Anonymous for obvious reasons.
written to prosecute.
TBH I don't really trust the claims of either side.
Do I think SAP could have studied the competition and used "Project Bridge" as a trap to get them to cough up trade secrets? Yes.
Do I think Terradata has had few new wins lately? Yes.
Would I trust either of their claims without a team of independent experts going through them? F**k no.