back to article Astroboffins, get in here and explain Saturn's odd-shaped balls

A trio of physicists reckoned they’ve figured out why some of Saturn’s moons are so oddly shaped, with some looking like giant floating ravioli and others imitating stubby baguettes. Saturn is most well known for its complex ring system and it is estimated that at least 62 moons are hiding amongst the structure so far. NASA’s …

  1. Blockchain commentard

    Or the inner moons are new and haven't formed into a sphere yet (come back in a billion years) due to their own gravity.

    1. Rich 11

      Something a few tens of kilometres across isn't going to have sufficient gravity to reshape itself, unless perhaps it's made of something very loosely held together, like an ammonia snowball. A substance and structure like that will have a low density, though, meaning that the moon's gravity is also going to be particularly low.

  2. Michael H.F. Wilkinson Silver badge

    Only spheroid moon?

    Apart from Iapetus, the moons Titan, Mimas ("Death Star"), Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, and Rhea are close to spherical. All are further away, and out of reach of (too) severe tidal disruption (i.e. outside the Roche limit).

  3. Kaltern

    Saturn's Slightly Squished Satellites Show Significant Space Shove Splat Symptoms.

  4. Anonymous South African Coward Bronze badge

    Bah and humbug.

    I was thinking of building a bunker on one of those moons, until the scientists mentioned that collisions with other moonlets/asteroids/alien spacecraft may occur.

    No way that our local inn-sewer-ants companies will cover such a risky venture...

    1. Francis Boyle Silver badge

      Just use Mimas

      Once the fitting out is done the other moons won't stand a chance before your mighty death ray.

  5. Dodgy Geezer Silver badge

    Some of these moonlets look more like radar dishes. Which is appropriate, given that Iapetus was the moon that the monolith aimed the alien data beam at as a signal that the human race was finally space-faring....

  6. handleoclast
    Thumb Up

    Headline and article contained rude innuendo

    Excellent!

    1. Jay Lenovo
      Trollface

      Re: Headline and article contained rude innuendo

      Next, "The Register" will imply that "eggy farts" were wafting around Uranus.

      Oops, did that last month.

  7. Robert Helpmann??
    Childcatcher

    That's no moon!

    Now that the definition for what constitutes a planet has been revised in a most unsatisfying manner (and may suffer further revision), will this study spark a similar revision as to what constitutes a moon?

    Making popcorn and getting comfortable.

    1. imanidiot Silver badge

      Re: That's no moon!

      I think that is a very relevant question. Are they actually moons or are they for instance captured asteroids.

      1. Jtom

        Re: That's no moon!

        The name given to a body in astronomy is dependent on its location and relationship to other objects. For example, the same object could be a meteor, meteoroid, or meteorite, depending on its location.

        Our moon, orbiting the sun without its partner Earth, would be a planet, even if it were once part of Earth. An asteroid captured by a planet would be a moon if it met the size requirement. It is thought that many moons in the solar system are captured asteroids or planetoids.

        BTW, the question of our moon's formation is still in debate, although the giant collision (someting colliding with Earth) theory is most widely believed correct.

  8. Joerg

    It is pretty obvious that those are spaceships...

    It is pretty obvious that those are spaceships... despite the official babbling about rocks and asteroids and moons... The shape alone should be enough to let anyone with a brain understand it. But nowadays most people are just zombies and don't think with their own brain, they enjoy being enslaved and trusting all the official obvious lies.

    1. onefang

      Re: It is pretty obvious that those are spaceships...

      The give away is this from the article - "making them look like flying saucers". If it looks like a flying saucer, flies like a flying saucer, and quacks like ... OK, that didn't end well.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like