back to article Chrome update kills unwanted ad redir... WIN A FREE iPad!!

Chrome will begin blocking some redirect links in an effort to crack down on particularly annoying web ads. Google says that, starting with the Chrome 64 build, its browser will no longer automatically execute redirect links that are embedded in iframe code. This, the Chocolate Factory hopes, will help stop ads that redirect …

  1. Ken Moorhouse Silver badge

    How is that different from NoScript?

    Which has been around since William Caxton ("use my printing press - no script necessary").

    1. Jim Mitchell

      Re: How is that different from NoScript?

      NoScript is not exactly user friendly, with the default of block all, figuring out what to allow to get the result you want can be ... difficult.

      1. Florida1920

        Re: How is that different from NoScript?

        NoScript is not exactly user friendly

        I've been using ScriptBlock in Chrome. Seems easy to use or turn off when required.

      2. Snowy Silver badge
        Coat

        Re: How is that different from NoScript?

        That is not due to NoScript but the number of off site scripts some web sites seem to need to display content. Even the simple Google.co.uk as scripts from 5 different domains.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Google wants to make sure only their ads appear on your screen.

    1. Flakk

      RE: Google wants to make sure only their ads appear on your screen.

      Exactly. The purveyors of these ads and their networks would probably love to raise the obvious anti-trust complaints against Google, but for the likelihood that Google would probably love to "algorithm" the plaintiff's web presence to oblivion.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Up

    Advertisers complaining about loss of income...

    Boo hoo. My heart bleeds. May they all die in poverty. Scum.

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    So where do I sign for that free iPad? /jk

  5. PhilipN Silver badge

    One piece of feedback

    Jesus H. .... Is this what you get when a 'net company is run by starry-eyed youngsters?

    "a page will unexpectedly navigate to a new page"

    Urrrmm... yes. This has been symptomatic of web browsers since Day One.

    "for no reason"

    Are you kidding? Let's say one of the distractions thrown at users was aimed at (cough) adolescent yearnings.

    How much time and other resources do they expend on finding out the bleeding obvious?

    1. Lord Elpuss Silver badge

      Re: One piece of feedback

      Google articulates known problem.

      Google fixes problem for you (and them).

      What’s your point?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: One piece of feedback

        "Google fixes problem for you"

        It's not a problem, it is how redirection should work. The problem is you & porn sites.

        "Any site that doesn't remove the 'abusive' content within 30 days will have all new tab and window links disabled in Chrome."

        Sure, sure... that's not abusive in itself. Hey don't worry, Google will lead the way themselves in filing abuse complaints, but only against 100% of non-Google controlled ads.

        As long as you believe Google does what it does for your heart and spirit, clouds are farce. Praise sun, blinded, Google.

        1. Lord Elpuss Silver badge

          Re: One piece of feedback

          "It's not a problem, it is how redirection should work."

          When I visit a webpage and am redirected by 3rd party content which I didn't ask for, that's not how 'redirection should work' - it's abusive and Google is right to put a stop to it.

  6. Aynon Yuser

    What is this? 1997?

    I can't imagine that in this day and age that people still fall for the "free" stuff trick on the internet and still makes the purveyor of crap still profitable. Yeah I know they're collecting user info and selling it to marketers.

    But really now...

    1. David Roberts
      Facepalm

      Re: What is this? 1997?

      Well, quite.

      Especially as SPAM is dying out because nobody clicks on it any more. Oh, wait.......

      .

      .

      .

      .

      P.S. You can't patch or filter stupid.

    2. Richard Jones 1
      Stop

      Re: What is this? 1997?

      The wonderful thing is that every year is like 1997s ground-hog day as another bunch of 'gifted and talented kids' learn how to want lovely shiny stuff. Who can blame them, they see it all around them, even more of it than in the real 1997, so when it is offered as only a key press away, why not?

      Sadly while old crap may be old and crap tall oo often it still just works and with minimum effort by the crap slinger.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Unhappy

      Re: What is this? 1997?

      "I can't imagine that in this day and age that people still fall for the "free" stuff trick on the internet "

      Clearly you don't own a Facebook account

  7. Anonymous South African Coward Bronze badge

    wot? the free ipad is a lie?

    now that is teh sux.

    1. David 132 Silver badge
      Happy

      And you're telling me that all those times I tried to punch the monkey in that advert, it was a lie?

      Next I suppose you'll claim that Bonzi Buddy is up to no good.

      MY WORLD IS DUST!

      Oblig. XKCD: New Car

  8. David Roberts
    Big Brother

    Kicker at the end

    If your site doesn't play by Google's rules it will be disabled within Chrome.

    Possibly a big step from a user blocking content with ad or script blockers to Big Daddy taking another step to be web censor. This is a difficult one because there needs to be some kind of filter (see discussion of YouTube and kids) but allowing a remote corporation to impose its world view on your world view could be the thin end of the wedge.

    1. druck Silver badge

      Re: Kicker at the end

      The only thing that is disabled is automatically triggering an unexpected action. A button will be available to trigger the action, if and only if, that is what the user wants to do. No censorship involved.

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Just an attempt to block the most intrusive ads, to avoid users employ full ad blockers

    Ad blockers which will also kill the very remunerative Google ads...

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like