Uber sued by ex-Lyft driver tormented by app maker's 'Hell' spyware A former Lyft driver is suing Uber alleging the ride-summoning biz spied on his movements and violated privacy, competition, and communications laws. Plaintiff Michael Gonzales, who drove for Lyft from 2012 through November 2014, filed suit in San Francisco, California, on Monday, claiming Uber developed and deployed software …
and an injunction that requires Uber to avoid further violations.
Bwahahaha... The only injunction to stop Uberian Californication is 10Mt into the San Andreas fault. Nothing short of that.
The Gospel of the Valley is: "You shall disrupt and Regulations are for losers". Uber is just taking the valley standard behavior to its logical conclusion. What we are observing is exactly what a disruptor (hallow be thy name) which ignores regulations is expected to do. Making Ubers (plural on purpose) comply with the law and have some residual morals is a lost cause - it is against the valley culture (especially the Web2.0 and post-Web2.0 generation).
Changing this and making it comply with the law means changing the valley mentality. Good luck with that.
There is another way.
Their business models are predicated on having a monopoly in a short timeframe. If the non-californian parts of the world aren't fertile ground for monopolies, the cancer will be contained and it will die.
You just need to encourage reactionary idiots not to vote for far-right governments, who will usher in an era of neo-feudalism, hurting those same idiots first and hardest.
nothing even remotely resembling "far right government" in the birthplace of Uber types. Nor do those owners of such companies typically support (or fund thru $10K USD-a-plate dinners) anything even remotely far-right. Seems that's been pretty much the only "mistake" Uber's owners have made-for until then there was a LOT less outrage over their business model.
"Bwahahaha... The only injunction to stop Uberian Californication is 10Mt into the San Andreas fault. Nothing short of that."
Sorry, its not a question of a 'sharing economy'.
The disruption is that you're allowing individuals to skirt the rules many areas have concerning livery service. It allowed non-regulated drivers to operate a 'gypsy cab service' where Uber provided the app and infrastructure for a large percentage (20%) of the cost of the service to manage the credit card processing, payments and logistics of the ride.
At scale, that's a huge margin once the infrastructure is paid off. Of course Uber is still not profitable (at least that's the word on the street because of the costs of developers, branding and of course the lawyers and PR people. )
What Uber has done is essentially allows anyone with a car to become a part time hack using their own vehicle.
The reason you see drivers leaving is that it takes them a year to realize that they are losing money while working for Uber and could make more if they take a minimum wage job in a large metro area. The only reason you do Uber is that there aren't enough 'flexible' hour jobs to go around.
As someone who's in the 5% but not the 1%, I can tell you that I rarely use uber. My main gripe with cabs in Chicago is that many are the economy Prius types where you can't sit upright in the back seat, or the cab is on its last legs falling apart. So I end up taking Uber Black which is on par with limo services because the limo drivers are driving for Uber when off shift. If I'm out and about, I'll hail a cab.
Has nothing to do with the cost of developers, branding, lawyers and PR.
It is because they have deliberately set the rates below a sustainable level to hasten the demise of taxis and prevent similar "ride sharing" competitors who are less well funded from competing. The barriers to entry for this market are tiny, so Uber has erected artificial barriers with their pricing.
Obviously the plan is that once taxis are all but extinct they can raise prices in markets where competitors like Lyft are weak or non-existent. The riders might complain when prices up by 50%, and the drivers might complain that Uber is keeping almost all of that increase for itself, but there won't be any alternatives at that point.
The riders might complain when prices up by 50%, and the drivers might complain that Uber is keeping almost all of that increase for itself, but there won't be any alternatives at that point.
On the contrary. By the time Uber has cornered the market and can increase prices, there will be no drivers, only self-driving cars.
Über über alles!
(Risking invocation of Godwin's Law, I know)
"My main gripe with cabs in Chicago is that many are the economy Prius types where you can't sit upright in the back seat, or the cab is on its last legs falling apart."
You can blame that on local regulators. Around here, both taxis and private hire cabs have to undergo an annual inspection and will be taken off the road by the regulator if not up to a decent , clean and good mechanical standard. I think, but am not sure, that there is minimum emission/pollution standards too which takes the older cars out of the taxi/minicab cycle too.
Was that before or after they realized that design could be used to track their competitors?
Before anyone in the UK gets too smug that this could not happen there Google the behavior of "Stagecoach" and deregulated bus services. Mrs Thatch's economic advisor (when this happened) wanted an owner operator model of buses like that he had seen in Chile.
Which explains the UK's 3rd world bus service.
In IT their bahavior harkens back to NCR when they were the National Cash Register company and their CEO's comment on "Competition" was "the best way to kill a dog is to cut its head off."
This post has been deleted by its author
John Smith 19
John Smith 19
This sort of thing goes back a long way. The Beeching era of railway cuts was instigated by a government minister who had a road transport business.
Come to think of of it, in my own life, the UK ( and US ) adminstrations both launched investigations into the best way to teach reading run by proponents of an approach ( phonics) that makes it easy and cheap for publishing companies to produce profitable teaching packages and painting-by-numbers remedial systems, easy to sell at premium prices to cash strapped schools who need a ( compared to the cost of an extra teacher) cheap method to get kids past the targets and local authorities who could get rid of their specialist teachers. A system that give an impression of success that is easy to sell to the public. Everyone's a winner ( except the kids who find reading mechanical and boring).
@Terry 6, actually, phonics (phonetics) is the best way for children to learn to read. I don't know if the textbooks have made a simple and quick method boring and dull. I can easily image it. But, using phonetics, a child can learn to read in about 4 months or less. My mother used phonetics to teach 'remedial reading' to children taught by other methods (the old 'guess' method so popular in the 1970s) and had them reading in no time.
> I don't know if the textbooks have made a simple and quick method boring and dull.
From having to help my children read, I can say that the standard text books are boring and dull. Because we made a habit of reading to our children they rapidly came to understand that the school books were merely there to measure attainment, real books were so much more interesting...
Roland6 Yes. many of the off-the-shelf system actually avoid meaningful text (stories) and use the pages for a glorified word practice. They actually state this explicitely. One example, used with early readers goes something like;
Cox comes in.
Rox says " I am sad"
Cox says "I can fix it"
Ox comes in.
[Ox appears on the page, but takes no further part in the narrative. A picture of Ox remains on the pages. I can't remember if it looks ox-like, but I doubt many inner city 5 year olds will know much about oxen. I can't remember if Rox's sad gets fixed.]
Incorrect. Phonics, on its own, is far from sufficient. Being both inaccurate and slow. Phonics combined with a full use of whole language ( not "guessing" but working words out logically) is best. It's what I've used at the most senior level for 30 or so years.
However, Phonics alone, a Behaviourist approach to learning, will get kids able to read regular words well, and relatively easily. It is certainly one route forward.
Re: "Unlike Lyft, Uber changes the tokens it uses..identify drivers, to prevent such tracking."
Which explains the UK's 3rd world bus service.
Have you ever taken a bus in the 3rd world? or in the US? UK buses may not be perfect, but they really aren't that bad..
-=-
In Chicago, what makes the bus service bad is the cars that park in the bus lane causing disruption. Or you can take the EL which isn't as bad as NY but getting there.
I still have my oyster card from riding the tube in London. Not bad. Cleaner than the EL, and you probably won't get mugged...
you want bad bus service?
try anywhere not a major metro. even in California. I'm not even an hour south of San Francisco but services are practically useless. limited scheduled runs and even those are completely missed often. Sitting at a bus stop during a weekday afternoon, when busses are scheduled to run every half hour...for an hour and a half...and no bus even comes by on the route. that's just for starters.
No excuses for such considering the budget and promises of using all that tax money to actually make the city's services useful for anyone with a job or schedule to keep.
This post has been deleted by its author
In this grave new world of deskilled jobs and casual labour masquerading as self employment, I wonder if the likes of Uber really care about retention, just so long as the supply of new peons is adequate to replace the ones who give up. I forsee a world where increasingly impoverished workers migrate from casual job to casual job in utterly different industries, desperately hoping that one or another might turn out to bring home a living wage.
Well if they don't know, they will soon.
I think that a turnover of 97% means a lot of people that say negative things about the company. If one unhappy customer drives away 10 potential ones, this is a tsunami of dissatisfaction in the making.
And I can't wait for that tsunami to hit Uber's shores.
If, as seems likely, Uber lose their appeal against an employment tribunal verdict here in the UK, they will have to pay the minimum wage in the UK. And National Insurance. And maternity / paternity leave. And redundancy. And every other cost that's part of 'employment'.
I wonder what the retention is after a week, a month, and 3 months. I bet there is a decent number of people who never give a ride, either because they never bother or spend a day in frustration trying to catch a booking and getting beat to it. And I bet there is a significant portion of drivers who, after giving a ride or two, decide that that kind of work isn't for them and quit. And another good portion that find a "regular" job and quit.
The one year number looks bleak, but it's only a single data point.
Sadly Uber does fill a void When I go out drinking, thre are lots of cabs to take me home from the bar. Now getting a cab from my house can take up to an hour were as uber is 5 minutes. Cab want to be were the can can get a quick fare so no cabs driving around housing. I've ran into issues were the cab did not show up.
Then there is San Francisco. were you have a 50 50 chance of get professional driver. But hey at least they dont take you the long way around. In fact they take you the fast way possible to get more fares. That means driving like they are on a race track and running red lights. w Worst cabbie was during pride. I should gotten out but hey I wanted to go to the next party. The Guy craned up the radio playing EDM me and my friends were sliding around. You would of thought we were in the movie bullit . We got out ofthe cab and walked a mile in heels.
and Uber/Lyft, etc would be just like Amway and Mary Kay.
The biggest sink to profitability is that the owners of the actual company want as many drivers as possible so they get more cash to skim. If that reduces the amount of fares any single driver in an area receives, doesn't matter to the Pimp..err..."app" company at all.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
