That's a great piece of legalese. Because we managed to get you thrown out, you have no legal standing to argue that you should be let back in and we win forever, even though what you're complaining about is directly connected to all of that.
Cisco denies restraint of trade in Arista-spat, asks court to dismiss case
Under fire from Cisco and US trade regulators, Arista has fought back by accusing Switchzilla of anti-trust behaviours. So last week Cisco asked a Californian judge to dismiss the case. Arista filed its suit in February last year, complaining (PDF) that Cisco indulged in “a scheme of anticompetitive conduct to retain its …
COMMENTS
-
Monday 27th March 2017 15:22 GMT vgrig_us
Huh?
"back to the IP infringement case Arista lost"
Huh? Which case is that? The jury case in proper court Arista actually won (one has to read arstechnica to know that - theregister didn't bother to cover it as far as i know)? Or the one in front of clown, always on the side of incumbent big company International Trade Commission joke of a court? Do, please, specify, will you?