Revealed: 'Suicide bomber Barbie' and other TSA quack science that cost $1.5 billion From 2007 through 2015, the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA) spent $1.5 billion trying to identify potentially dangerous travelers by observing their behavior through an ongoing program called SPOT. SPOT stands for "screening of passengers by observation techniques." And according to the TSA's own documents, …
"TSA's behavior detection approach is designed to identify and engage individuals who may be high-risk (eg, possess malicious intent) on the basis of an objective process using behavioral indicators and thresholds, and then route them to additional security screening,"
That word "objective". I do not think it means what you think it means.
"identify and engage individuals who may be high-risk (eg, possess malicious intent) on the basis of an objective process using behavioral indicators and thresholds"
I know it doesn't mean what they say. Those are the individuals they appear to deliberately ignore so they can focus on children and the elderly.
The TSA is a jobs program for the otherwise unemployable - people who couldn't get jobs as mall security guards or Starbucks baristas.
*Unless they started putting CCTV in the TSA luggage inspection areas.
They can't, of course, for "reasons of national security"
I have absolutely no problem with customs opening my luggage in front of me in the presence of witnesses, but uncontrolled access without supervision is not just a route for theft, it also introduces the possibility of a setup. Heck, they could even turn people unwittingly into drug mules for all we know.
TSA's behavior detection approach is designed to identify and engage individuals who may be high-risk (eg, possess malicious intent) on the basis of an objective process using behavioral indicators and thresholds, and then route them to additional security screening
Indeed. For a while, I was randomly selected for the enhanced security screening every time I would board a flight in the US. I can't be sure what was the objective process used to make the determination, but my guess is that it was a combination of three factors: at the time, I had a crew haircut and a full-face beard, making me look like a muslim to some idiots. I believe the second factor was a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit I took, where I got rerouted through Paris. The TSA guy I had to explain this to clearly took this as a fiendish attempt to evade the then-ongoing paroxism of the wars on stuff, and ended up making copious notes - which undoubtedly went on my file. The final straw was my unfortunate tendency to be polite to older helpless-looking people, which once prompted me to help a very nice old lady in a muslim dress to move her luggage in an area where TSA in their infinite wisdom has barred luggage trolleys. I also chatted to her afterwards for a while, as we were both waiting for a flight.
Bingo.
For the next two years, my every attempt to check in online will fail. Every boarding pass I will get at the airport will have the dreaded "SSSS" security flag. If I were lucky that day, I'd just get an extra security machine or two and a bit of light whole-body massage; if not, it would be into the waiting room for an interview - so after a while I started carring some extra reading material, and allocating extra two hours for clearing the security.
Then, after couple of years of this charade, it just stopped. No doubt TSA paperwork has shown that Yet Another Security Incident was prevented by the clever behaviour-science wizards at TSA.
What did people imagine would happen? The TSA was set up rapidly and to do this rapidly, they asked everyone else amongst the TLA's to send them staff: "Give us your best and brightest!" was the call
- of course what they actually got in response was the deadwood, problem people, misfits, idiots, the people we cannot fire for XXX reason and whatever else could be spared.
If one is, for example, the FBI one does not necessarily want Competition to succeed and attract more staff and more funding because of it, now, does one?
This post has been deleted by its author
-- to the artist Simon Tyszko’s Suicide Bomber Barbie.
"Suicide Bomber Barbie draws attention to certain kinds of moral, emotional, and political equivalence, which uncomfortably exist within the nationalistic and political systems that contain them. That these systems are dysfunctional, goes without saying."
Indeed. One may say similar things about the TSA, though I think no one doubts the need for security at airports.
Was a Brit selling dowsing rods to Iraq
Not just Iraq.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADE_651#Investigations_and_export_ban
Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Georgia, India, Iran, Kenya, Lebanon, Niger, Pakistan, Qatar, Romania, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Vietnam, but still not the TSA, yet.
Plus, other brands of dowsing rod are available...
Absobloodylutely.
The positive sample is too small (and thanks god for that) to draw any statistical conclusions. What do we have today. 2 or 3 attempts. The shoe bomber, the pants bomber and who else?
Even if we have preflight observations of them, it is mathematically impossible to get any results out of a sample this size so trying to get them is a rank raving lunacy.
Typical sloppy job by El Reg.
" It also includes a cartoon that presents a mother and daughter wearing hijabs, arguing over the daughter's desire for a sixth "suicide bomber martyr Barbie.""
The "funny" retort from the mother is "you have six already".
Six plus the one in the little terrorist's hands makes seven. The desire is for a seventh suicide bomber martyr Barbie.
This lack of attention to arithmetical detail is rife in western society, its scientific papers and its software, the reason why space probes can't land properly, the hallmark of Fake News and bogus Global Warming Conspiracies and the main reason the terrorists are emboldened and not surrendering and laying down arms already.
Harrumph, sir! Harrumph!
$ dig thereg.ah.fuck.it
; <<>> DiG 9.10.4-P5 <<>> thereg.ah.fuck.it
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28625
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;thereg.ah.fuck.it. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
thereg.ah.fuck.it. 3600 IN A 46.252.31.30
;; Query time: 359 msec
;; SERVER: ::munged::
;; WHEN: Thu Feb 09 01:10:53 PST 2017
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 62
::heh::
Just asking, my sons GF was pulled for drug searches EVERY time they went through a US airport last year, no one else in the rather large group was even glanced at (she speaks broad Dudley); the rest speak with slightly more refined accents (Shropshire and Worcestershire).
Me?? I have refused to visit the US since they pointed machine guns at my 7 y/o son, because he had a drawing pin stuck in the heel of one shoe; and took his Mickey mouse toy away, "because it looked like a gun"; even then, clearing security in the US took nearly as long as the flight.
You think thats bad.... wait until you set off the metal detectors .....because of the surgically implanted metal that holds your leg together...
"look out hes got a suicide leg!"
Boris
<<despising the twonk staffed agency since they cut the straps on his backpack in order to open it....... the helpful plastic clips that held it shut were 1 inch away ....
We've given up flying for this very reason. Full stop. My lady has a prosthetic leg and numerous joint replacements. She gets pulled out every freakin' time. She'll them that she can't do some things they want her to like raise her hands over her head (shoulder replacements) and then they try to force her arms to move where they can't. They'll fiddle with her prosthetic for awhile, discover the battery (it's microprocessor leg) and try to confiscate it because.. bombs.
Fucking morons running amok is what they are.
You think that's bad. Wait until you set off the plastic explosive scanner alerts with the arthritis in your joints.
"Would you mind stepping into the body scanner sir?"
"Not at all."
Buzz Buzz Whoosh Whoosh
"Er ... officer, could you inspect the passenger's knees and thighs please?"
"Wait, what? Doesn't someone have to offer me candy first?"
Maybe I haven't lost my black country accent then... (I moved away 19 years ago.)
My family managed to clock up 7 bag searches spread across 5 of us on a recent trip to Florida from the UK. (We changed flights at Washington, hence managed to clock up more bag searches than we had items of hand baggage by having bag checks there as well as in the UK...)
For the record, it gets pretty boring once you've worked out that your offspring *hasn't* put a tub of rice pudding or a large rock in their bag *this* time and it's just some strange configuration of crayons, books toys etc. that's making the staff working the scanner worry...
Have some retired KGB chaps been providing advice to the TSA?
No, judging by the cruelty on display they must be descendants of all the Nazis scientists the US took in after the war instead of convicting them as war criminals. You must be pretty deluded to think that what they do contributes in any way to security - you could achieve just as much at 1% of the cost by randomisation. Actually, I think that may actually be more effective as it takes away the profile blindness they have at present: if you know what profiles they use you can work on falling outside those parameters (which MUSt be happening already). By randomisation you strip predictability from the process and thus increate the risk of detection.
But hey, that would mean someone would have to hand in 99% of their budget. Not going to happen - troughs must be filled for that many snouts..
Funny. My brief time with a military organization far more reputable than the TSA taught that women were much harder to indoctrinate in a military situation as they are not natural team players to the extent that men are (no idea if that is true, but it is what was taught).
I was held up in Israel because I was an older female traveling with an older female and we were Just The Type to be sweet-talked by young and sexy Hamid and Abdul into taking 'presents' back to their family in my country. Because all older single female are putty in the hands of doe-eyed young Palestinians. I guess even the lesbian ones, like my partner (now missus) and myself.
"... roving officers, some undercover, who engage travelers in casual conversation while looking for telltale signs of malicious intent, whatever those might be. Ostensibly, these conversations were voluntary, but seeking to avoid them or being insufficiently forthcoming was treated as an "indicator" that might prompt referral to additional screening."
Being accosted by strangers who try to lure me into converstion is guarenteed to make me tense and glower. Repeated experience has shown me that those sorts of people are usually up to no good.
Only in Tejas and North Dakota. Elsewhere, you need a permit.
Tm Lehrer has something to say on that!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NfW2tYIn8-Q
- very funny (as most of his stuff, in this case his tally included 2 Game Wardens, Seven Hunters and a Cow (purse bred Guernsey)
"A complete stranger sidling up to me and trying to pump me for information"
Last time someone did that to me at an airport they were running a 'free holiday' timeshare competition scam.
As far as I'm concerned, the only legitimate pumping for information should be asking what I want from the menu.
"exactly - as a British person, if I don't know you, please don't engage me in conversation at random - to me that's an obvious sign of malicious intent!"
And that's only one quite minor cultural difference that needs to be taken into account in a huge highly travelled international transport hub! The TSA behavioural observers must be genius level!!!
"Being accosted by strangers who try to lure me into converstion is guarenteed to make me tense and glower. Repeated experience has shown me that those sorts of people are usually up to no good."
Considering all I've heard and read of the TSA "experience", if I ever went to the US I'd be so bloody nervous their "observational behaviourists" would be around me like a swarm of flies! Luckily, I'm never planning on going there. I used to think I might like to, but not any more.
"Lawmakers from both parties have been quite critical of this program," Handeyside said. "We don't see how these kinds of techniques, given decades of research, can be used in a way that's consistent with passenger civil liberties."
But this is Trump's Amerika, and snake oil sales are at an all time high. Civil Liberties? Yeah, we heard about them once...but didn't pay attention.
I visited Turkey for a couple of days to watch the eclipse
IRT that "to watch the apocalypse". I would have thought that the US is currently the best place[1] to watch that.
[1] Preferrably from afar. Being caught in the middle of a proto-apocalypse probably isn't much fun.
I *really* wanted to go to the US in August, to watch the solar eclipse... but I'm not subjecting myself to the ignominy that is their visa-application process (I live in Latin America). And I definitely won't risk the change of getting to know a TSA agent intimately while in the airport.
My now adult son related a story to me from his last trip to the US, last year.
They were in a security queue, behind a large group of young Chinese school children; TSA Nazis started marching along the queue screaming "backpacks on the ground". Obviously the kids didnt understand, so the the Nazis grabbed the kids, dragged them out of the queue and roughly ripped their school backpacks off.
Not a passenger.
Per flight.
So the USG kindly stepped in and took that burden off the poor overloaded airlines.
And put it on every US taxpayer instead.
I'll let US readers decide who they think got the better end of that deal.
I work in an industry where industrial espionage is a large problem. If I'm travelling to the US it's probably on bussiness, which means that I won't be discussing where I'm going or what I'm going to do there. The best even the TSA is going to get out of me is probably "Service for semi-conductor fabrication technology". They wouldn't understand even that probably.
I could swear TSA meant "Theatrical Stealing Agency"...
Why didn't they just copy Ben Gurion? You can even keep your shoes on!
Because it is:
a) Expensive (and not in a "how much can I skim off the top" way).
b) Requires trained, intelligent people rather than semi-evolved non-sentients.
c) Was invented somewhere else.
I went through a similar "casual conversation" with a nice young man at the El Al terminal at Newark Airport in 1997, before even being allowed to get my boarding pass. The flight was Newark-Stansted-Tel Aviv. After a few minutes of "conversation," the NYM would walk away to consult with an older man, then return for more chatting.
I wonder.. for those who bash the TSA, how well can you perform a job where you must make 20-200 decisions an hour, 40 hours a week and get each of these tasks done correctly. Where, if you make one mistake and miss something, lives are put in danger.
Yes, it's easy to bash TSA when you're ignorant. However, I'm willing to bet you make at least 2 to 3 mistakes a week at your job.
Let's not forget. The ACLU doesn't exactly have the best reputation when it comes to credibility. It obviously doesn't have all the information here (by their own admittance). Also remember, there is no expectation of privacy when travelling.
I've been pulled aside at an airport TSA checkpoint many times for additional screening, patting down, etc. Along with having to open my carry on luggage many times. I'm clean cut, usually wearing a suit and give them no reason I know of to search me. Hmm... perhaps the TSA has a problem with penetration testers. Or maybe, it's because I usually carry on two to three laptop computers along with some Ethernet cables and a SOHO router. No, that's not it... I should ask the ACLU...I'm sure they could come up with a frivolous reason.
Of course you come to the conclusion anyone who carries onto an aircraft this much electronic equipment should be looked at a little closer.; However, it can easily be spun into saying the ACLU doesn't trust penetration testers, and therefore they are profiled for extra scrutiny.
The leadership of the ACLU gets paid a lot of money. The more they spout out and the louder they are towards issues the elite left support, the more money they get from the filthy rich left. So don't think for one moment the ACLU cares about anything but donations to their bank accounts.
I wonder.. for those who bash the TSA, how well can you perform a job where you must make 20-200 decisions an hour, 40 hours a week and get each of these tasks done correctly. Where, if you make one mistake and miss something, lives are put in danger.
That sounds exactly like the job a transit bus driver does - except that in most countries, the hours are longer, and the working conditions are tougher for the bus driver. In fact one might argue that the consequences of a mistake by a bus driver (or any other heavy equipment operator) are usually more severe and more immediate than for a TSA agent.
Nonetheless, most people do not experience apprehension when interacting with bus drivers, and do not bear grudges and latent hostility against them. Could it be because most people can clearly see the importance and utility of a transit driver's work, and are not expected to unquestioningly obey all orders, no matter how nonsensical, issued by their bus driver?
Yes, the ACLU has never been playing with a full deck, and even less so now!
/rant
The Fifth Column keeps funding them, together with BLM, SJW and other subversive threats.
The Media keeps telling us that everything is opposite of what it is!
Mass Psychosis,caused by mass media, the internet and social media, which is like the Babel Fish of the real world. By removing all barriers to communication, it has caused more and bloodier wars than ever before, as well as removing peoples ability to think. One human can be quite intelligent and wise, but many humans interacting becomes dumb, panicky animals!
The Lefts feminist brainwash of a whole generation of school children laid the foundation, and now silicon is doing the rest..
To solve this, we must abolish mass media and communication, going back to the Fifties.
Eradicate Feminism and voting rights for women, who cannot think but only feel, even while BELIEVING that they are thinking. If only men could vote, would our borders be wide open now?
Would Real Men ever have invented the Schengen agreement??
Remember that every Male Dog is, in essence, A Son Of A Bitch!
/rant off
This may seem only tangential to the subject, but everything IS connected!
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
