Re: Is it...
> > | > : >> > Reply to post: Re: Is it...
> > | > : >> > Encrypted email sign-ups instantly double in wake of Trump victory
> > | > : >> > 9 hrs Updraft102
> > | > : >> > Bronze badge
> > | > : >> > Reply Icon
> > | > : >> > Re: Is it...
> > | > : >> >
> > | > : >> > Yes! It never should have been there in the first
> > | > : >> > place. I've loathed this ever since it came around.
> > | > : >> > Even worse is when they send a multipart email
> > | > : >> > that's supposed to contain a plain-text version
> > | > : >> > and a HTML version, and the plain-text version is
> > | > : >> > empty. To those of us who actually have the email
> > | > : >> > diaplay option set to plain-text, it shows as a
> > | > : >> > blank email! Leave the plain-text section out and
> > | > : >> > let my client reduce the HTML to plain-text, if
> > | > : >> > you must, but don't tell me this is the plain-text
> > | > : >> > version and then leave it blank!
> > | > : >> >
> > | > : >> > Then there's the plain-text version that says
> > | > : >> > something like, "Your email client doesn't support
> > | > : >> > HTML. Please upgrade it." Yeah, sure, I'm going to
> > | > : >> > upgrade to another email client because you said so,
> > | > : >> > because I want to get HTML emails from you, right?
> > | > : >> > (Yeah, it DOES support them, BTW, but I have it
> > | > : >> > turned off. Hint hint.)
> > | > : >> >
me too