Re: Confused
So how come they have come out now and said this?
The referenced NASA article acknowledged the 1978 discovery of large scarps on Mercury and signs of geological activity, but the large scarps were geologically old (billions of years) and interpreted to suggest that the shrinkage had halted. Other signs of geological activity, like Mercurian volcanoes, are also billions of years old.
The new finding has identified very new (<50MYr), never-seen-before scarps only tens of meters high, which Mariner 10 couldn't have seen.
planetary surface raises and falls with the gravity pull from the sun
A bit, sure, but the Sun's tides on Mercury aren't that awesome. I've seen values varying from "17% more than the Moon's tides on Earth" to "17 times." In either case, that's not enough to make water, let alone rock, flex by miles or generate the effects seen on Io.