back to article Border Force bureaucrats become super-spooks

Australia's long sleepwalk into a surveillance state continued last week, with the largely-uncontested passage of the suite of bills creating the Australian Border Force (ABF). As well as telecommunications metadata access, the legislation wrapped the Australian Border Force (ABF) in a protective coating of spook-power. Last …

  1. Thorne
    Black Helicopters

    "since it's now a law enforcement agency with access to metadata, and able to declare its own operations to be secret."

    Now all it needs is it's own Gitmo and black bag squad

    1. Mark 85

      They can find their own black bag squad but I'm sure that our (the States) government wouldn't mind renting them space. And with the long trip from Oz to Gitmo, if some prisoners decided to step outside the plane for a breath of fresh air, no one would notice.

      1. Trigonoceps occipitalis

        How about Norfolk Island? Why was it taken under the wing of Oz?

    2. P. Lee

      >Now all it needs is it's own Gitmo and black bag squad

      Australia uses various south pacific islands for holding nasty people (AKA refugees) so it doesn't have to comply with its domestic laws.

      Same idea as gitmo, but mostly aimed at those who think Australia is a good place.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      They already have their own Gitmo.

      It's called Manus Island.

  2. Trixr

    I can tell you that most of the "bureaucrats" who got smashed into Border Farce with no choice during the departmental merge have little to no interest in metadata shenanigans, nor acting as keystone kops on the sly.

    Well, except for those who enjoy wearing navy blue boiler suits (sorry, whatever they call their "tactical uniform" these days), tooling around in fast boats and training their German Shepherds. Those guys love it. They, however, are not the "bureaucrats". There are a few bureaucrats who would love to be a boiler suit guy - they're undoubtedly all over this like a rash. They are the minority.

  3. JamesPond

    Walls have ears

    Better shoot that GSD, looks like he's got his ear to the door listening for secrets.

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    For a country started by criminals...

    ...they seem to have got really squeamish.

    1. Chris G

      Re: For a country started by criminals...

      The British Government ' started' Australia but due to a lack of interested emigrants they started to transport criminals to provide a slave/labour force. Often it was something as small as stealing a loaf of bread that could get you a one way cattle class ticket down under.

      Before the population were criminalised for the smallest reason to get people there, now it looks as though they may criminalise the population again for little reason. Perhaps they are going to bring back bondsmen to save paying wages.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: For a country started by criminals...

        "The British Government ' started' Australia but due to a lack of interested emigrants they started to transport criminals to provide a slave/labour force. "

        A lot of us back in Blighty wish our ancestors HAD stolen a load of bread and been transported. As things were, they didn't (or more likely, didn't get caught), so we're stuck here, we've already got mass surveillance, an incompetent "border force", three times as many people on an island a thirtieth of the size, and we have to put up with shit weather.

        1. Thorne

          Re: For a country started by criminals...

          As Alexei Sayle once said when asked by Australian Customs if he had a criminal history upon entering "Oh I didn't know you still needed one to come here...."

        2. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: For a country started by criminals...

          No, started as a dumping ground with pretensions to being a reformatory. It was astonishingly successful in that. The first University was started 40 years after First Settlement. Once the idiot poms had realised the seasons were reverse of the old hell hole,and farms were made where there was soil, not sand, the place developed quickly as a free settler destination.

          Now one of our pressing questions is whether we should stop all human imports or mess up the landscape with even more humans. Given the naturally wildly varying rainfall between decades, let alone years, ideology in the form of dogmatic vested interests versus the hair shirt brigade are trying to decide to grow or stabilise within water resources by who shouts loudest. (read owns the most pollies)

          In the meantime, pity the bureaucrats who just want to go on being clerks etc instead of part of the new <censored>. Cant say that as it might offend someone.

      2. This post has been deleted by its author

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon