That tricorder app can't come soon enough
That is all.
Have you fondled your slab in the hope of finding sex with a handsome stranger? Then you may want to get down the clap clinic pronto, because people who seek sex using smartphone apps are more likely to catch a nasty STD. That's the key point from a new study of hookup apps like Tinder and Grindr. Bonk-mad boffins in Los …
The only conclusion i can draw from this study is: "there is a correlation in the few thousand gay and bisexual men we surveyed in LA that have gone to the clinic and use Grindr or Tinder have a higher chance of getting an STD"
There is no evidence to point to this occurring elsewhere or amongst those that engage in sex with women. Hell, they didn't even rule out other demographic factors such as age, race, upbringing, etc.
What I would like to see is the creation of an App like those mentioned except that in order to join, you must undergo regular STD screenings and next to the username something like "Clean as of %date%" and maybe a counter of how many partners since then (To indicate potential risk). With proper tracking in the App, you can send alerts to a users' previous partners in case in case they test positive for something. This way everyone stays safe while still remaining anonymous.
I think you've read the study wrong. It wasn't to find out if you had an STD, but surveyed those with STD's to see where they picked up the ones who infected them - cyberspace or meatspace.
It turns out anonymity encourages both risky and irresponsible behaviour and tech enables anonymity.
I'm shocked!
From the title I thought Cupid's Measles would have been getting herpes on the hand from herpes on your genitals!
Serious bit - these 'researchers' obviously never knew anyone from the gay scene back in the 70s. Had friends of that inclination (statable couples mostly) who would regularly go trolling for a bit of 'rough trade' at a London gay club called Heaven. Not one of them is alive today (no ARVs back then) which is a bloody shame as they were genuinely nice people and good friends.
I suggested this as an add-on to newer phones, using the existing camera hardware LED with a casing including a variable aperture narrow band filter that causes the common STI bacteria to fluoresce.
It also occurs to me that a possible workaround for many of the problems of conventional STI clinics is to have a basic test kit sent to a shared PO box with a unique code; this code unlocks the results for whoever happens to be associated with the number(s) so it is completely anonymous and secure.
If the basic (much more sensitive) test kit detects something, then they go to the proper clinic knowing that they probably do have a problem.
Would also allow detection of non pathogenic but problematic bugs such as strains of persistent thrush (guess what, this brought down many swinging groups not the clap as previously thought) as well as tracking of antibiotic resistant bacteria in the community.
(mine worked fine for ten years before I upgraded to something with a camera), but it ain't hardly "smart" in the whiz-bang cellphone sense. Unless that's some other type of hardware that's happy to see me (and wearing a disguise so as not to frighten the children) ....