back to article McAfee chap is back in crypto-wrap chat app back flap

Antivirus pioneer and one-time fugitive John McAfee has backed Chadder, a new instant-messaging app for smartphones that promises "the highest degree of security and privacy." The app is being marketed by Future Tense Central, a J.McAfee-owned company that claims to be headquartered in Silicon Valley, although McAfee himself …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. James O'Shea

    is there someone

    anyone, anywhere, who actually trusts this demonstrably mad as a hatter nutbag?

    1. Martin-73 Silver badge

      Re: is there someone

      I am kind of on the fence. At least he doesn't HIDE being mad as a hatter and a nutbag. And he WAS right about the antivirus product bearing his name

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: is there someone

        The really crazy people, the ones to fear, are the ones who know their crazy, but carry on regardless.

        1. Elmer Phud

          Re: is there someone

          "The really crazy people, the ones to fear, are the ones who know their crazy, but carry on regardless."

          Nah, when the going gets wierd, the wierd turn pro.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: is there someone

        OK, then let me help you by just checking how careful they are with client privacy.(stripped down answer for clarity):

        $ dig futuretensecentral.com mx

        ;; QUESTION SECTION:

        ;futuretensecentral.com. IN MX

        ;; ANSWER SECTION:

        futuretensecentral.com. 600 IN MX 0 mx1.balanced.homie.mail.dreamhost.com.

        futuretensecentral.com. 600 IN MX 0 mx2.balanced.homie.mail.dreamhost.com.

        The company as well as their email path is entirely US based, which means they have as much chance to withstand a legal request for data as Lavabit and Silent Circle had, i.e. none whatsoever.

        Ergo, do not trust. Next!

  2. devicemanager

    Intel is still using the McAfee name

    Please note that as of today Intel is still using the McAfee brand name.

  3. Ketlan
    Facepalm

    Gawd...

    'He's baaaaack'

    Oh, ffs...

  4. Cliff

    Paranoid geezer in security app hype

    Why am I not surprised it's a privacy app? Sounds like the kind of thing a person prone to paranoia might want to use.

    It may or may not be cocaine related, just that a lot of major coke-heads get quite paranoid, and a lot of megalomaniacs (who name products after themselves) who come into money might get a taste for the gak. Pure speculation, mind.

  5. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Avoid like the plague

    He is reported to have been associated with that con-artist Gibson Research, Zone Alarm, and others, all worthless, including McAfee antivirus!

  6. Crazy Operations Guy

    His servers better not be in the US

    Encrypting end-point to endpoint is technically a violation of the USA PATRIOT Act, which requires service providers to have at least one location where the Feds can get an unencrypted data stream. So one of two things will happen: Either he will need to expatriate in order to get out of the reach of the US (Because he can't comply with warrants for customer data) or he is colluding with the Feds and the messages exist unencrypted or unencrypted somewhere (Which begs the question, so why exactly is he storing the messages in the first place?).

    Simply re-designing the app so that the messages are purely p2p rather than going through servers would fix everything though.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: His servers better not be in the US

      There is nothing 'simple' about 'purely p2p' ....

      The servers *have to* store the (encrypted) messages, because they have to receive them and then forward them. So for a few milliseconds the messages are 'stored' on the server. Wether or not the messages then get deleted is not mentioned, but it wouldn't make much sense to keep them.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: His servers better not be in the US

      a - the servers ARE in the US

      b - p2p is not a guarantee for privacy or security. It may make it harder, but it's actually by design impossible to control where traffic goes, which means you're only one BGP update away from a data grab.

      I'd avoid this as much as I have everything else that has come from Silicon Valley.

  7. harmjschoonhoven

    Security by obscurity

    Secure encryption is only possible when the key is longer than the message.

    During WW II "Die Rote Kapelle" used for its daily radio transmissions from Brussels to the Kremlin an antiquarian unpublished roman as its codebook.

    It is unclear how Chadder shares its key(s), how they are generated and what they are.

  8. Arachnoid

    Alternatly for security

    TextSecure

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.thoughtcrime.securesms#

    Red Phone

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.thoughtcrime.redphone

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like