back to article D-Wave IS QUANTUM, insist USC scientists

The evidence seems to be stacking up in favour of D-Wave's claims to be offering the world a kind of quantum computer, but merely exhibiting a quantum behaviour might not be enough for the company to turn the computing world upside down. The latest news, which broke late last week, is that tests at the University of Southern …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Michael H.F. Wilkinson Silver badge
    Joke

    Uncertainty about quantum computing?

    Well, it's quantum, innit?

    1. Crisp
      Trollface

      Re: Uncertainty about quantum computing?

      I guess we'll find out if it really is a quantum processor after the wave function collapses.

    2. andreas koch
      Paris Hilton

      @ Michael H.F. Wilkinson - Re: Uncertainty about quantum computing?

      >...

      Well, it's quantum, innit?

      <

      I'm not sure about that, let me guess: - - - maybe?

      Paris, because she's not sure about this 'thinking' stuff . . .

      1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge

        Re: @ Michael H.F. Wilkinson - Uncertainty about quantum computing?

        Your Ket is showing!

  2. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge
    Trollface

    Sounds like there are homeopathic amounts of quantum involved.

    Where's Professeur Jacques Benveniste?

  3. John Smith 19 Gold badge

    "they’re certainly the first to do so with so many superconducting qubits,"

    8?

    That does not sound very high to me.

    BTW WTF is this new layout? Commenting in the "Age of Austerity?"

  4. SecurityPedant

    Gotta love the register. Hundreds of comments from serfs about how Windows 8 is a failure. yet the comments on this article demonstrate the average intelligence of the register reader.

    Me included by the way...

    1. Rol

      Intelligence no, knowledge, most probably.

      I would hazard a guess many reg readers are intelligent enough to keep it to themselves until they have accumulated enough knowledge on the topic to make a worthy comment.

      As for Windows comments, well, I would like to retract my previous statement.

  5. Number6

    Errrr...

    How about a block diagram and an outline explanation of what's supposed to be happening? I bet most of us haven't got a clue but would be interested to know more.

    Or are the El Reg hacks also scratching their heads and just providing commentary on press releases?

    1. Robert Helpmann??
      Childcatcher

      Re: Errrr...

      Or are the El Reg hacks also scratching their heads and just providing commentary on press releases?

      Did you miss the part where someone outside the D-Wave group who is qualified to comment on the issue was invited to do so? He also made a pretty straight-forward explanation as to what the processor's limitations are.

      1. Number6

        Re: Errrr...

        I want to know how it works at all. I understand a conventional processor, how does the quantum bit come into it? My best guess is that it's using quantum states instead of larger bit-storage mechanisms but how it does that in a stable manner and how the state is then determined is beyond my present understanding, which I'm seeking to extend.

        1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge
          Holmes

          Re: Errrr...

          Simples. You encode the problem in an analog formulation involving a "start" hamiltonian which is slowly and linearly replaced during the computation by a "target" hamiltonian so that at the end of the computation, as the system settles into its lowest energy state, the bits encode the solution you want. The thing gets problematic as the D-Wave machine is not using full entanglement across all its bits (so it's not actually matching the mathematical idea), there is noise, it does some proprietary magic and actually finding the solution may take exponentially long in the end as the lowest energy point lies in a very flat landscape. Or something.

          Maybe this will help: An introduction to quantum annealing

  6. Laughing_Man

    "You changed the result by measuring it!"

    I was hoping for a Farnsworth logo!

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    As backed by NSA

    D Wave are backed by In-Q-Tel, the venture capital arm of the CIA/NSA.

    Funny nobody mentions that.

    1. kyza

      Re: As backed by NSA

      Perhaps people don't feel the need to mention this fact in every single article written about it, especially since there's always a good, concerned global citizen such as yourself to make the point somewhere in the comments...

    2. John Smith 19 Gold badge
      Unhappy

      Re: As backed by NSA

      "D Wave are backed by In-Q-Tel, the venture capital arm of the CIA/NSA.

      Funny nobody mentions that."

      VC's often invest in companies that turn out to be complete rubbish.

      They are hoping for the one that makes the 1000% ROI to justify it all.

      Will D-Wave be it? Who knows?

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    It's a mechanical turk

    “outperformed on its own, native problem, by simulated annealing running on a standard laptop”

    So what are the bets that this thing has a load of pipes, lasers, cryogenic pumps etc, and inside they've hidden an Intel i3 which is connected to the inputs and the outputs?

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Is it quantum until you open the box?

  10. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Everything is quantum!

    I hate this "omg this is quantum" - the keyboard at my desk works due to quantum mechanics: were it not for the Pauli Exclusion Principle my fingers would go right through the keys!

    Quantum mechanics is why my water bottle is clear(ish), why my monitor emits light, why my chrome badge clip is shiny, and so on.

    1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge
      Paris Hilton

      Re: Everything is quantum!

      So why do you hate it? Just to be edgy? This is El Reg, not Physical Review B.

      The point of the expression is of course to distinguish the capabilities of a new physical device from a "classical" one, which should be obvious to any El Reg reader. A short hand to say "quantum mechanical effects indeed shown to be used by D-Wave's quasi-quantum-annealing thing". Be glad that you don't get a LOHAN or PARIS crammed into the headline.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Everything is quantum!

        I dislike it because there is the implication that *only* this is quantum - that somehow, everything else isn't quantum. That incorrect dichotomy makes people reason incorrectly about what is going on - they begin to ascribe all sorts of magical properties to "quantum" gizmos, failing to take into account the fact that the world we live in is just as much driven by quantum mechanics as the new whizzygig that is being touted.

  11. John Stirling

    to address the chap worried about the average intelligence of commentards...

    ...But does it run Far Cry?

  12. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Still impressive

    Even a few qubits on a chip is still better than the current "state of the art" requiring an MRI machine to read the bits stored in alcohol or chloroform etc.

    Am I right in saying that their chip is limited by being a 2-D array of qubits so the physical separation becomes the limiting factor?

    If so then an 8*8*8 3-D array of qubits with each layer having its own read/write lines and optics might provide stronger connectivity between the qubits.

    Alternatively use cryptochrome C derived from nature as the quantum element and just run it at room temperature ?

    AC/DC 6EQUJ5

  13. Andy Fletcher

    After purchase discussion

    Larry Page: "When can I see this quantum computer we spent all that money on then?"

    BOFH: "We're not sure, but we are certain where you can see it."

This topic is closed for new posts.