back to article New rules to end cries of 'WTF... a £10 online booking fee?'

The government has issued guidance that sets out the kind of costs businesses incur that they are legitimately able to claim back through payment surcharging. Under the Consumer Protection (Payment Surcharges) Regulations, which took effect on 6 April, businesses are prohibited from charging consumers excessive fees for using …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. lansalot
    WTF?

    so...

    When I go to my local gig-hut, buy two tickets over the counter, on the night of the event as I'm going in, and with cash, my "£2.50 booking fee" is illegal then?

    It's an argument I've had with them a few times, does this help out at all - or only for online matters?

    1. Aqua Marina

      Re: so...

      This annoys me when I book cinema tickets and I get charged a "booking fee". They are getting the money up-front for crying out loud.

      1. Fogcat

        Re: so...

        Can't see how they'll be able to justify a surcharge per person, per direction when the payment is all on one card (i.e. 8 charges for a return trip for a family of 4).

        But I'm sure they'll try!

    2. SteveK

      Re: so...

      Last gig I went to charged a couple of quid "postage" to email me the tickets..

    3. Amorous Cowherder
      Facepalm

      Re: so...

      They all do it and on any price ticket too. I go to some less than wonderful little dives in London, the tickets are sometimes as cheap as £4/head but you buy online and they instantly slap a £1.50/head booking charge and £2.50 to post. I've even been charged a "postage" fee on an eMail only, PDF ticket FFS!

    4. DaLo

      Re: so...

      Booking and administration fees are not included in this legislation as long as they are not dependant on a particular means of payment (i.e. A set booking fee is allowed but a booking fee only payable if you use a credit card is not).

    5. peter 45
      Happy

      Re: so...

      I have heard that if there us no way of buying the goods at the advertized price (ie without booking fee), then they are false advertizing. Try reporting them to trading standards. Arguing with the jobsworth minimum wage monkey behind the desk is never going to work.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    So are SleazyJet and Ryanair going to fall foul of this?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      No chance

      There be some new fee added on, Seat Valeting charge maybe, or an entrance fee at the plane door. They'll find someway to charge the same and stay in the rules.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Don't Forget A £1 a piss

        And £2 for a poo

    2. Ken 16 Silver badge

      EasyJet maybe, Ryanair aren't a UK company.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Facepalm

        Both will...

        ... They do business in this country. Ryanair also has some ops here, which does put them under the new rules.

        Easyjet already lists an admin fee, which is the credit/debitcard fee + other bits.

        I suspect it's more the ticket vendors (like Ticketmaster/LiveNation and the secondary resellers) that are being targeted. I'm glad to see that though... like others, I'm fed up being charged fees that have nothing to do with my getting a service.

    3. Robin
      Meh

      RyanAir

      I fly a lot and RyanAir are normally quite high on my hate-list, but recently they've got better and the up-front price was actually the same one I paid with my debit card. Credit card marginal fee was something like a couple of quid.

      Clearly they're just moving the numbers around, but if the up-front price is correct then I can live with that.

      1. Test Man
        Stop

        Re: RyanAir

        "Clearly they're just moving the numbers around, but if the up-front price is correct then I can live with that."

        Yeah I'm pretty sure that instead of charging wildly excessive prices if you use a credit or debit card, they now simply call it some "admin fee" or something else now, so EVERYONE pays.

        1. Robin

          @Test Man Re: RyanAir

          "Yeah I'm pretty sure that instead of charging wildly excessive prices if you use a credit or debit card, they now simply call it some "admin fee" or something else now, so EVERYONE pays."

          That was my point. Instead of being 'pretty sure', I'm certain from the last two times I booked with them that the price they quoted me up front was the same as the one I ended up paying with my debit card (I tried changing it to credit card out of interest to see how much it increased by, and it was a couple of quid).

          Of course they're going to continue charging the same overall amount, but no admin fees were added on at the last minute like before - they were incorporated into the base price as they should be. Makes it easier to compare them through SkyScanner et al.

          I feel I need to re-add that I'm far from being their biggest fan; just making sure things are accurate. They now quote prices in the same manner as EasyJet, Monarch, etc.

    4. Colin Miller

      EU law

      IIRC. this is an EU directive, but has been implemented ~1year early in the UK, as a result of certain company (who shall remain nameless) taking the piss.

    5. Anonymous Coward
      Trollface

      No, because it's vague enough to let them carry on scamming you.

  3. Pen-y-gors

    But, but, but...all payment involves the payee in costs

    At least as far as business transactions are involved:

    If you pay by credit card, they pay a credit card fee.

    If you pay by cheque they (almost certainly) pay a cheque processing fee - and have to fill out payin slips etc. which takes time.

    If you pay by cash, they have to sort the cash, take it down to the bank, stand in line and (quite possibly) have to pay a fee for depositing it

    If you pay by debit card, they pay a small fee.

    If you barter for a dozen eggs they have to cook the eggs.

    They can't charge extra for cash payments, so why can they charge extra for debit card payments? Simple answer, if someone starts getting stroppy and demanding extra fees then pay in £1 coins!

    1. Aqua Marina

      Re: But, but, but...all payment involves the payee in costs

      When I used to own a retail outlet, I was charged by the bank 3% for credit card transactions, 25 pence for debit card transactions and 50p for cheques. What these new rules are saying is that the fees can be passed on to the customer, but they can't exceed the charges they pay. So the £5 debit card fee that I've been seeing recently when booking hotels is now illegal, but they could charge me 25p.

    2. billse10

      Re: But, but, but...all payment involves the payee in costs

      "If you pay by credit card, they pay a credit card fee." - which may vary depending on whether it's a consumer card or a corporate card, and depending on card brand may not be accepted at all. Charge cards like Amex are a different breed, too ...

      "If you pay by cheque they (almost certainly) pay a cheque processing fee - and have to fill out payin slips etc. which takes time." so take the 30s it takes to fill out a paying in slip multiply it by checkout staff wage, add the processing fee and you have the cost

      "If you pay by cash, they have to sort the cash, take it down to the bank, stand in line and (quite possibly) have to pay a fee for depositing it" - so again, take the actual time needed (again, maybe 30s or so) & multiply by checkout staff wage, add any fee, and you have the cost

      "If you pay by debit card, they pay a small fee." 25p or so, not £5 or so though ...

      If they want these regulations to work, won't it mean companies will have to actually handle differentiated pricing based on whether you are paying by corporate or personal cards, for example?

      1. DaLo

        Re: But, but, but...all payment involves the payee in costs

        No, You can average it out across a single payment type such as Credit Cards and then just have the difference of that average above the cost of another payment type such as debit cards.

        1. billse10

          Re: But, but, but...all payment involves the payee in costs

          credit cards are not a single payment type if different cards cost different amounts to process, they are multiple types ...

          easier fix: make the companies in question show their actual costs for processing each payment type, explain "yes mr customer if you pay cash it'll cost us 10p, debit card 25p, personal card 2.3%, company card 2.8% - oh, and because we use dial-up, the phone line costs X whereas if we used IP it'd be Y, and keeping track of those difference costs us a few hours a quarter of management time so we have to factor that in too. The phone number for your bank's "business banking payment systems are too complex" complaints department is ..... "

          1. DaLo
            Facepalm

            Re: But, but, but...all payment involves the payee in costs

            Your question was "If they want these regulations to work, won't it mean companies will have to actually handle differentiated pricing based on whether you are paying by corporate or personal cards, for example?"

            The answer is - No, you can average it out. Credit Cards IS a single payment type. This isn't my opinion it is the regulations.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Amex / charge card

        Not sure why many people seem to think that all American Express cards are charge cards.

        This is not the case.

        They do offer a charge card product, but their primary business is in credit cards and traveller's cheques.

        Amex credit cards account for 24% of all credit card transactions in the US.

  4. Chuunen Baka

    Believe it when I see it

    We once had to miss a domestic flight. BMI (as was) were obliged to refund the £40 air passenger duty and they deducted £25 "admin fee". Money grubbing bastards. Will this really be the end that sort of abuse?

    1. Nigel Brown

      Re: Believe it when I see it

      No, if the snouts get ousted from one trough, they'll simply find another.

    2. My Opinion
      Unhappy

      Re: Believe it when I see it

      As I read it this ruling is purely to do with differential costs incurred relating to payment types. So if they are charging everyone the same "admin fee" then this does not stop them continuing to do so.

      1. Kevin Johnston

        Re: Believe it when I see it

        Seem to recall they also add the processing fee per traveller per leg even when it was all part of one transaction so your 'nominal' £5 fee suddenly becomes £40 for a party of four on a return trip even though it is only one debit card transaction.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Believe it when I see it

        As I read it this ruling is purely to do with differential costs incurred relating to payment types. So if they are charging everyone the same "admin fee" then this does not stop them continuing to do so.

        So get ready for them all to roll out their excuses of "we didn't want to have to change this admin fee to people like you but as we need to charge some people this fee then the law makes us charge you the same".

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Believe it when I see it

      But you entered into a contract. You didn't turn up, leaving BMI with an seat, which they may or may not be able to sell.

      This is a completely different argument.

      1. The Specialist
        FAIL

        Re: Believe it when I see it

        The key word is "Duty" ie. tax, which they have to pass on to goverment. And if you are not travelling, you forfeit the ticket fee but not the tax.

    4. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Believe it when I see it

      A nameless Scandinavian EU government lost a EC court case, obligating them to repay pro-rata the extortionate tax they apply to cars in that country, when a car was exported.

      The tax rate is approx. 200%. so a 20,000 pound car thus costs 60,000 pounds. After say x-years the car is exported, and maybe it has a local value of 30,000 pounds (there is an official scale for calculation), so the tax component would be 20,000 pounds for refund. The government "fee" for this service is 15% or in this example 3000 pounds.

      Governments, you see, are even worse when all is said and done ...

    5. Hans 1
      Joke

      Re: Believe it when I see it

      Well, did you not say "Sir, I have an admin fee, too, £35 please?"

  5. Flywheel
    Thumb Down

    I see the British Museum are pulling an interesting one with their online booking system: no more than 8 in a party and a £1 booking charge *per ticket*. How do they justify that?!

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Booking charge per ticket

      I would postulate that a limit placed on the number of tickets that can be purchased in a single transaction is irrelevant if the booking fee is per ticket anyway.

  6. Andy H

    TicketMaster "Ticketfast" Charges

    £2.50 to use your ink and paper to print your own tickets.

    'nuff said

    1. Magister
      Flame

      Re: TicketMaster "Ticketfast" Charges

      Bought a ticket through these graspers as there is no other source available for the specific event; The have the monopoly on the ticket sales.

      Apart from the actual fee for the seat, I was charged a "booking fee" which increased depending on how expensive your seat price was (just under 10%). Then there was delivery charge for the tickets (£5.25 each ticket) which you still have to pay even if they screw up and you have to collect the tickets on the day (which I had to do 4 years ago - I travelled not knowing for definite if I would even get in). On top of that, there is a fee for payment; and that varies according to card, but you still have to pay.

      The worst bit is that they skim off off some of the tickets and pass them on to their "sister" site (Getmein). The tickets that they pass over then go up in price by 2 - 5 times face value. If you try to get normal tickets after they have "sold out", they just re-direct you to Getmein where there are plenty available it seems.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: TicketMaster "Ticketfast" Charges

        Re: TicketMaster and GetMeIn

        Sometimes they skim almost all the tickets off to sell at massively inflated prices on GetMeIn. They do this based on the demand for "pre-sales" tickets - another scam in itself. Take for example a low key gig by a very popular band that my wife wanted to go and see. The pre-sales tickets went on sale on Thursday, and sold out in minutes. Come the following Monday at 9am, and no tickets went on sale - you were immediately redirected to GetMeIn, where the tickets were in excess of £100 each.

    2. Andrew Moore
      Thumb Down

      Re: TicketMaster "Ticketfast" Charges

      I just stopped going to concerts unless I can buy tickets at the door. I refuse to give TicketBastard anymore of my money.

    3. Kevin McMurtrie Silver badge
      Mushroom

      Re: TicketMaster "Ticketfast" Charges

      £2.50 sounds like a bargain. US Ticketbastard fees are commonly 50% the ticket price, even for expensive events. Disgust and lack of a box office keeps me away from most concerts.

    4. Hans 1
      Joke

      Re: TicketMaster "Ticketfast" Charges

      elCheapo, maaaan ...

      Ryanair its 40 euros "to print the tickets!", yes sir, that was about the same amount as the fare, one way ...

      As for the icon, no, this is not funny, it is criminal!

  7. Big_Boomer Silver badge
    Mushroom

    Rip off

    I have always hated all of these "add-on" fees. Be they booking fees, surcharges, cost recovery, or any other form of fee that the company will have to pay. So, here is a message to all companies that charge such fees:

    Why not just include the "fee" in the price of your item? I have no objection to paying a slightly more to have tickets emailed/posted to me rather than having to travel to the theatre myself to buy them. I feel the same about the ISP con-artists who sell broadband at £3 a month (Plus £15pm Line Rental). Why not just say £18pm Including Line Rental? Be INCLUSIVE! And the first person to ban the practice of selling items at £189.99 or £199.95 gets my vote too. What a waste of space that is. Just sell it for £190 or £200. Nobody cares about the 1p saving.

    1. Ashton Black

      Re: Rip off

      Quite simply, psychology. Even though you or I would not care about 1p, studies have shown this to be an effective marketing ploy. Same goes for "headline price", it may not work for some, but enough to make it a viable trick.

  8. Velv
    Go

    Total Cost Display

    Perhaps one answer is to force businesses that apply such surcharges to publish the price as a range for all payment methods and mandatory inclusions (i.e. payment is not optional, so payment method is not considered optional).

    So that "£29" flight would need to be published as "From £49 to £89"

  9. xyz Silver badge
    Unhappy

    mmmmm....

    I just bought a DLL the other week and the transaction was in US dollars. When I got my redit card bill the item was converted into sterling at the credit card's exchange rate as normal (obviously not in my favour) and then underneath that was £11 exchange rate conversion fee. I've never seen that before and will be having words.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: mmmmm....

      That 's what would normally called a commission. An expensive DLL I take it?

      Credit card issuers seem to charge a reasonable exchange rate and then pile on the conversion fee.

      Back on topic, here in Maine businesses are not even allowed to add a surcharge for credit cards or debit cards. As a result there are some hold-outs who only take cash and cheques. Businesses can offer a discount for using cash or check.

      Personally, I like this change and charging a distinct, consistent fee is fine by me. I want to know what the credit card companies are charging and I think it's good for people to understand that credit cards are an expensive way to pay and that's why I avoid them when dealing with local businesses. If you don't need to borrow and don't need the easy recovery you can use cash, debit or even cheque instead and I'm sure the business will be a lot happier.

      Booking fees can be annoying, but aside frkm Ticketbastards "convenience fee" I don't mind a separate booking fee that separates the "event" price from the administration price, as long as I pay once per transaction.

    2. Steve the Cynic

      Re: mmmmm....

      There are three exchange rates of interest when changing currency. Let's start with the main headline rate that is quoted by financial news outlets like Bloomberg or BFM Business(1). That is what I call the "centre rate", upon which all other rates for exchange between those currencies are based. The centre rate is the rate paid by forex traders who often deal in nine or ten figure sums per transaction.

      So, the other two rates? They are the "buy" and "sell" rates. Let's talk about exchanging between dollars and Euros, since that's the sort of forex transaction I'm most likely to have in my everyday life. The "buy" rate is the rate I pay when I buy dollars with euros, and the "sell" rate is the rate I pay when I sell dollars for euros. These rates, in effect, are the centre rate modified by a notional commission rate in favour of the bank / bureau de change / Marks & Spencer(2). (This is the origin of the name "centre rate", since it lies in between the buy and sell rates. A bureau de change in a Eurozone country will normally fix their buy and sell rates for, say, Euros-vs-USDollars as the centre rate minus(buy) or plus(sell) some number of USD-cents per Euro.)

      A lot of credit and debit cards will quote the centre rate when converting a transaction quoted in a foreign currency, and then add in an exchange fee. My (French) bank does this, and the fee is (a) small and (b) dependent on the amount of the transaction. I'd say that 11 quid is a bit steep by my standards, unless your DLL was priced somewhere over $1000.

      The alternative is that they charge a "buy" rate, but that causes all sorts of problems, since some fraction of the less knowledgeable customers will see a discrepancy between the centre rate and the rate on their bill and kick up an unholy fuss.

      (1) BFM Business is a French business/financial news organisation, available in various formats. It is similar in coverage to Bloomberg's news offerings, but with a French slant. BFM originally stood for "Business FM".

      (2) I don't know about now, but up to 2009 (during which year I left the UK, and haven't been back since), M&S was the cheapest way to just buy/sell foreign currency against pounds, since their "spread" (difference between the buy/sell rates) was smaller than anyone else's. It was amusing watching Thomas Cook staff in the queue at the M&S exchange counter, as if they could get a better rate there than any putative staff discount...

      1. xyz Silver badge

        Re: mmmmm....

        Nope the DLL was $576 which converted to £377.78 (at 1.52) + £11.14 for a couple of electrons to do stuff and called a non sterling transact fee. Piss and taking spring to mind.

        1. deadlift

          Re: mmmmm....

          A lot of banks are now stripping out Visa/MC's 2.75% fee into a separate line, rather than rolling it into a single conversion as they used to. You're being charged the same, but the effort for clarify has led to confusion. I hate it.

      2. Dale 3

        Re: mmmmm....

        There are a few credit cards that don't charge a fee for foreign denominated purchases. Two that I know of are the Post Office Mastercard and Halifax Clarity card. I have the Post Office card primarily for holiday use and the occasional offshore purchase. They charge the "centre" rate, and no additional fee.

        There used to be one or two debit cards that also charged no fee (e.g. Nationwide Flexaccount), but as far as I know none are left - they all now charge, typically around 2-3%.

        A good place to find out which cards are best (and worst) to use is to look for "holiday spending" on the MoneySavingExpert website.

  10. DrXym

    It's about time

    Airlines (e.g. Ryanair) would charge a £5 "fee" per leg per person of a trip. So the flight might be £100 and they charge £10 even though they're only charged £1.50 by the payment processor for the transaction and the remaining £7.50 is trousered by the airline.

    How this doesn't constitute fraud I don't know.

  11. Anon

    Virgin Media

    Are Virgin Media going to have to explain how it costs them five quid to process an on-line credit card payment as compared to direct-debit payments?

    1. Allan 1

      Re: Virgin Media

      Actually, if you read the legalese, they pass it off not as a £5 fee on credit card payments, but a £5 discount on direct debit payments, effectively evading this legislation.

  12. Steve Graham

    whack-a-mole

    Ryanair have already dropped the additional card charges and replaced them with a fixed "administration fee" which is not part of the headline ticket price, but which is always compulsory.

  13. spiny norman
    Unhappy

    Car rental

    Must be the worst. "We'll pick you up" actually refers to helping you back on your feet after you see the difference between the price you booked it at online and what you'll actually pay after all the insurance, surcharges and waivers you need so if the car gets scratched you don't have to buy them a new one.

    1. captain veg Silver badge

      Re: Car rental

      You are not obliged to take out the excess cover from the rental company. Either drive very carefully or buy such insurance from an actual insurance company. You can get annual cover for about thirty quid.

      Mind you, I would never knowingly rent from an outfit that has to "pick you up" from (presumably) the airport. It's just asking for trouble. Stick to the majors that have a presence in the terminal building, but feel free to check with brokers for best deals. Often, though, the company's own website is cheapest. I'm taking a car from Avis at Barcelona airport later this week, just over a hundred euros for seven days and no fuel scam.

      -A.

      1. Vic

        Re: Car rental

        > I would never knowingly rent from an outfit that has to "pick you up" from (presumably) the airport.

        No - they pick you up from wherever you want to be picked up from.

        So when I last hired a car from them, they came to my house and drove me down to the rental place. Two days later, when I returned the car, we did the paperwork and they drove me home again.

        It's a good operation, IME.

        Vic.

    2. DrXym

      Re: Car rental

      Some online car hire sites offer their own collision damage waiver insurance but the car hire companies will still put a block on the excess until you return the car in the same condition or until the claim for damages is settled. IMO it's worth doing because the CDW is about 1/3 the price.

      Also take your own child seats because they will veritably rape you on the price of those. You could buy a new seat many times over for the cost that most places charge for one of their manky old seats.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Car rental

        " You could buy a new seat many times over for the cost that most places charge for one of their manky old seats."

        Not to mention that you have zero idea of the history of the things. How old are they? Did someone use one of them to belt in a 100lb drill press and then get sideswiped? Was it left out in direct sun for a week?

        Plus, with car seats, the brand actually matters quite a bit; some of them are nearly bulletproof and some of them aren't much better than a pillow. Hassle or not, I really try to take ours with us - and barring that, I go over the rental one with a fine toothed comb. If I was in doubt I'd prefer to go buy a new one somewhere and use that... It's just not worth it. Particularly given you're driving an unfamiliar (and probably not terribly safe to begin with) car in unfamiliar territory.

  14. David Evans

    I await RyanAir's response with interest

    Michael O'Leary must be gearing up for some kind of "fuck you" response to this. It will be interesting to see if UK customers suddenly see their ticket prices going up while booking fees disappear but everything stays the same in other countries.

    To be honest I'd prefer to seem him ignore it so they can be a high profile test case to establish some legal precedent.

    1. CmdrX3

      Re: I await RyanAir's response with interest

      Ryanairs "fuck you" response would have been simple... Booking Fee levy as a "protest". Strange how their protests always end up costing the customer money and profit for RyanAir. Saying that I haven't flew with RyanAir since they stopped flying out of Belfast, I only flew with them because I knew how to dodge all their fees and could get VERY cheap flights with them, £6 return per person to East Midlands on one occasion, but it appears those days are long gone. So given the choice for the same price, I would fly with another airline. Their credit card fees were extortionate back then, although I believe it's now been changed to a website admin fee or some other other equally extortionate nonsense nowadays.

      1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

        Re: I await RyanAir's response with interest

        Don't forget the http recycling fee charged on all those bytes you dump on their servers

        My cell phone company over here in the off-world colonies adds a $7.95 "system access fee" to my monthly bill

    2. Dan 55 Silver badge
      Meh

      Re: I await RyanAir's response with interest

      At the moment booking a return flight from Spain in Spain there's a admin fee of €7 per leg per passenger and a 'discount' of €1.16 per passenger if you play by debit card. This is different to a few months back so it must have been changed over this legislation.

      If you do pay by credit card the €1.16 is itemised as a credit card charge on the return flight, but a charge like this should be per transaction yet it varies according to the number of passengers. That, I suppose, is how you can complain about this in countries with stronger consumer law than Spain's. If they do get everyone's favourite Irish entrepreneur over this, he'll only move things round again.

  15. Graham Marsden
    Pirate

    "We received an invitation in the post one Monday morn'

    "To attend our cousin's wedding in the town where we were born..."

    - Cheap Flights by Fascinating Aida.

  16. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    in the US a tax that is legally defined as a tax to be paid by the carrier

    is passed on to the consumer on the monthly bill.

  17. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    wood for the tress

    I have never understood why it is legitimate to pass on any fees to the consumer.

    If the stores have collectively bent over to the credit card companies, then why do we have to suffer this also.

    If the credit card companies cannot make an effective business model from the interest and service charges, that they have to get a fee from merchants also, then they are more rubbish the record/movie companies.

    If i have milk to sell, i do not charge tesco a fee to sell it for me.

    The whole banking system is pretty rigged to keep new efficient competition out, while the banks figure out how they can give us a little at a time and work out new ways to plug the gaps on their P & L.

    1. graeme leggett Silver badge

      Re: wood for the tress

      reasonable to charge a bit extra if extra work is involved.

      non payment example - gift wrap. "that box of chocs is a tenner, and for a quid extra, I'll put it in some pretty paper"

      You see the hidden cost when you go to your corner shop and it says "minimum spend £5 for debit cards".

      If you buy a Yorkie (other chocolate bars are available) shelf price 70p and pay cash, that's done and dusted.

      But they don't want you paying for it by debit card because they'll be charged say 25p to do so, and that's a big chunk of the profit they would have made on your purchase

  18. Andrew Jones 2
    Meh

    So where will this put us in the current direct debit situation?

    Apparently paying by Direct Debit saves us £9 a month - which over a quarter is a fair bit - but as a charity we cannot always guarantee the money will be in the bank when they want it - so we opt to pay by card / post office instead which means we can use our personal card if the charities funds are too low to cover the payment. But I really cannot believe that it costs them £9 to let us use our card. Our Phone line is already stupidly expensive being a business line which we don't make any outgoing calls on (but have to have as part of the Entertainment License regulations)

    1. The Mole

      I think the argument is that Direct Debit payements are much less likely to be missed. If a human has to remember to manually pay be card then they are much more likely to forget meaning that letters have to be written, phone calls made and/or debt collectors contracted. This costs time and money. They are also faced with a higher risk of fraudulent transactions as a different card may be used for every payment.

      In your case why not setup a second bank account from which the direct debits are taken. If the charity has enough money it does a bank transfer to put the cash in the account 3 days before the DD is due. If it doesn't you transfer money in from your personal account?

  19. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    BUT, the choice?

    If I buy on line, and for many if not most airlines now that is my only choice, I have to pay by credit card. So, this fee is no longer a fee for extra cost, it is a charge for paying the airline, a bit like buying a loaf of bread from a bakery and having to pay a handling charge for the dealing with the coins I give them, to cover the charges that vary from bank to bank for running the bakery's account and the cost of the till.

    Now, if they allowed me to use my online banking to pay directly from my bank account or use a cheque or even an envelope full of cash, through the post I would have a choice. But, in UK, I have not got a choice. It's card payment or nothing. In some countries,like Switzerland, sometimes one can pay less with cash. I've never seen that in UK and there has to be the possibility to do that. Will Easyjet accept cash? If I go to a real ticket seller, when possible as it is with some airlines, they also charge more for that because of the extra staff. All these extras should be stopped if the firms have not got the decency to do it of their own accord, just like any other form of deceit in commerce.

    So, surely, it is up to the seller to negotiate better/consistent rates with their suppliers (Visa, Mastercard, Amex ...) and, as with any other cost, cover this in their ticket prices. Same with fuel surcharges: they must use fuel or the aeroplane can not take off. Their ticket prices vary with the weather anyway.

    It is like the old VAT scam, that was outlawed, where shop quoted a price and then, when you bought something, added the VAT, so getting the customer there on false pretences.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      "The old VAT scam"

      You seem to think that there is some legislation prohibiting dealing with prices before VAT. You are obviously seriously misled.

      When quoting a price, businesses are obliged to state whether or not that price includes VAT, if applicable.

      Depending on who their main customers are , they may choose to show prices one way or another, or even both. It is a legal requirement to itemise the VAT on the invoice, if applicable.

      This is because most businesses are interested in the price without VAT; they will reclaim the VAT and it is therefore not relevant. If customers are mainly of the trade variety then the preference is to talk about prices before VAT.

      It isn't an "old scam", it's called being sensitive to clients' requirements.

  20. Syntax Error
    Stop

    The Whole Piint

    of paying by debit/credit card is to primarily help the retailer get sell products and services. It is now carte blanche to charge extra for these services. Perhaps the real problem are the charges from the banks to the retailers. Why should you they be able to charge 50p or whatever for a transaction as they ultimately get the money in their accounts and can do what they want with it.

    I think this change of regulation is indirectly there to help the poor old banks re-capitalise for some reason and the retailer can amke a profit as well!

    When you buy a cinema ticket or whatever how do you know how much the retailer is being charged by the bank?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      @ Syntax Error

      It appears there are several syntax errors in your post.

      You also have a fundamental misunderstanding of the way card payments work.

  21. Tezfair
    Thumb Up

    I wonder..

    Couldn't *we* send them an invoice for our time and expenses? Maybe we could call it..

    attendance fee

    obligatory card usage fee

    patronage fee

    buyer fee

  22. This post has been deleted by its author

  23. Dogsauce

    Any chance of applying this to 'line rental' charges for internet access? No way does that 'cost' whatever they say it does, it needs to be wrapped up in the total amount paid. Some of us don't want/need a home phone.

  24. Anonymous C0ward

    Obligatory Monty Python link

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQsmbXFSiQE

    "Each week we get a large fee; at the end of that week we get another large fee; if there's been no interruption at the end of the year we get a repeat fee which can be added on for tax purposes to the previous year or the following year if there's no new series..."

  25. ecofeco Silver badge
    FAIL

    Bait and Switch

    Fees after the fact or in small print are nothing but bait and switch.

  26. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    don't like the rip offs?

    then push back, fuckwits.

  27. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    First World Problems

    don't wanna stand in line at some entertainment event so get charged for the "convenience"?

    waaaah.

    let me get the really tiny violin. Nice to see lawmakers working on the "tough" issues.

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like