Can't believe people are still using Office these days.
Office 2013 now on sale for business customers
Office 2013, the latest version of Microsoft's desktop productivity suite, is now available for purchase by business customers, even though individual users won't be able to order it until next year. The final versions of the Office application suite have been available to members of Microsoft's MSDN and TechNet subscription …
-
-
Tuesday 4th December 2012 07:20 GMT Khaptain
@AC Troll
And just what would you suggest is truly on par with office ? Please be carefull and avoid making a fool of yourself by answering the usual "Libre Office", Open Office solutions, they are really not on par.....
Ask yourself why the German Foregien Office made a u-turn ? In the end it would have cost them more money, not less to deploy the "free" solution. Go figure...
-
Tuesday 4th December 2012 06:58 GMT David Strum
Another "fresh bottle of bubbly"
Oh MS, big, fat, bloaty-corporate super tanker, pal: isn’t it time you made something new and exciting? Why this constant rehash? Why must we pretend the old 2003, 2007 and 2010 are so old now, we must have the latest? A lot of my pals are sticking to 2003 and most are using hooky licences: that’s the reality. You can't keep opening a fresh bottle of bubbly to try and keep everyone from leaving your party.
-
Tuesday 4th December 2012 09:19 GMT Test Man
Re: Another "fresh bottle of bubbly"
Who cares?
Stick with 2003 - no one is forcing you to move.
However, that doesn't mean companies must simply stand still. 2013 is available and if people want it, they'll get it.
No one really cares about you and your mates sticking to 2003. Congratulations *slowclap*
-
Tuesday 4th December 2012 09:44 GMT Khaptain
Re: Another "fresh bottle of bubbly"
Enterprise licences give access to new versions of office without adding any cost. The latest versions sometimes add bug fixes or improvements and those are more than welcome in any company.
No one is forced to update but then again if you are still running Dos or Windows 3,1 or Linux from the command line then it is easy to understand your position.
-
-
Tuesday 4th December 2012 09:28 GMT Michael Kean
Word 2.0 was good enough ...
... except for floating images.
I helped my partner write a book in Word 2.0 on a 386 with 16MB RAM - including many scanned full page images of maps and microscopy. Back then you had to insert a frame before you could place an image in it, and it was wise to link to images rather than embed them in the document so it wouldn't fall over. I've not seen much change in a practical sense since then in Word; other than improvements to image positioning, etc - although I don't use anything more advanced that table of contents, styles, mail merge.
Access 2007 and above however are soooo much nicer than Access 2003 and below. Still, I guess the only way to keep selling Office is to keep selling computers without Office on them. Office 2003 was the last one that didn't care how many machines it was installed on.