That BlackBerry has a *crap* camera
Seriously - I can't make out anything.
Sacked British RIM staffers to get minimum legal payout
Staff at RIM's UK headquarters were upset to see their VP tweeting about foie gras as they learned that the hundreds of them who will lose their jobs by the end of the year will be receiving the bare minimum redundancy payout that the government allows. A source told The Reg that the staffers who will be out the door before …
-
-
Friday 19th October 2012 16:14 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Poutine...
The are lots of variations, but the core is chips, gravy and cheese curds.
Having seen the horror that a mid-to-northern Maine chain restaurant served (meh fries, thick nasty gravy and some nasty yellow cheese) I was put off until we stopped for lunch in a small town in Quebec while passing through.
Do not underestimate the importance of cheese curds.
On our last trip over the border we found that you can buy curds _everywhere_. Small stores have bags on the counter as if they were chewing gum or sweets.
-
-
Monday 22nd October 2012 13:14 GMT Slabfondler
Re: Poutine...
quote: "On our last trip over the border we found that you can buy curds _everywhere_. Small stores have bags on the counter as if they were chewing gum or sweets."
...and in some places they are still warm as they were only made that morning, and they squeek...and that my friends is what you need to make real poutine - fresh squeeky curds. All else is just a greasy mess of chip gravy and cheese.
-
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
-
Friday 19th October 2012 11:05 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Singapore?
(a) it would be "faux grass la" for a start (if you've lived there for any time you'll get this one)
(b) they speak damn good English there, but AFAIK there are enough people too who are capable of looking up the correct way of writing or even speak French.
I have no idea what your view of Singapore is based on, but I'd recommend visiting.
-
Friday 19th October 2012 11:24 GMT Thecowking
Re: Singapore?
Singaporeans have exceptional English already lah, but the country itself is duller than a weekend in Bognor Regis.
Still, it's definitely worth a visit if you didn't spend most of your formative years hopping around SE Asia. (Malaysia,Thailand, Cambodia, Indonesia: jungles Mountains, ruined temples, orangutans! Singapore... Oh look an electronics store.)
-
Friday 19th October 2012 12:36 GMT genghis_uk
Re: Singapore?
Have to agree - Singapore is what you would get if the Swiss designed Kuala Lumpur. Very clean but mostly a large number of expensive shopping malls joined up by a really good transport system. A large number of ex-pats and everyone speaks English.
I prefer Bukit Bintang, KL though for all of it's oddities (or maybe because of them) :)
-
-
-
-
-
Friday 19th October 2012 09:20 GMT CmdrX3
Story about nothing
For the life of me I can't see any story here, he is only making a comment about an odd menu item. Something that is classed as fine dining food being served with a fast food. It's a bit like going to a chip shop and asking for a cheesy gravy chip served with caviare. Looking at the menu would suggest he is in a fast food place and is not actually boasting about eating Fois Gras.
I notice you didn't do an article about his tweet right after the fois gras one, which reads...
"Ok new experience. A tandoori chicken wrap purchased from "O'Briens Irish Sandwiches" in Singapore."
You see, pointless one sided nothing out of context articles like this are what keeps Fox News going. Perhaps a logo change is order of the day El Reg.
-
Friday 19th October 2012 09:37 GMT JimC
Au contraire
Its a story about how, yet again, the executive class, which should regard itself as no more than a necessary overhead, is living it up and filling its boots whilst the people who do the real work have to tighten their belts again and again.
Its (almost) enough to turn you into a damned socialist.
Aux lanternes! Aux lanternes!
-
Friday 19th October 2012 10:06 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Au contraire
> is living it up and filling its boots
In a fast food restaurant?
> whilst the people who do the real work have to tighten their belts again and again.
What do you define as real work? The people being made redundant are from the European Headquarters so I doubt they actually get their hands dirty manufacturing anything.
I suspect that your definition of "real work" is just about anything that doesn't fulfil a management role.
One other thing, every member of the "executive class" I have ever met have got there through promotion. They all (except for one) came from a middle or working class background. None of them were motivated purely by greed, they had the same motivations as everybody else (keep their jobs, feed their family, get ahead etc).
-
-
-
Friday 19th October 2012 09:31 GMT Anonymous Coward
Interested in how the company complies with the Law's
Given they have jobs advertised I hope those being laid off are fairly offered the opertunities and retraining.
Still given that they have not been in slough that many years I can only feel sorry for those being laid off who moved to be nearer work and save on nightmare journeys.
-
-
-
Tuesday 23rd October 2012 10:42 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: @ PXG
Some words do indeed seem to have sneaked off out of that sentence.
The point was that you are using apostrophes incorrectly.
You could take ten seconds to look up the rules, they are actually quite simple. In fact your day job probably involves things that are considerably more complex.
-
-
-
Friday 19th October 2012 10:25 GMT Ironclad
Minimum Legal Payout
Surely the real scandal is the Statutory Redundancy pay which is currently capped at £430 per year of service (roughly).
When first introduced in 1965 it was £40.
The current equivalent of which would be around £638.
Makes it much cheaper for international companies to lay-off employees in the UK compared to the rest of Europe.
Of course it also makes it attractive for companies to hire in the UK knowing they can divest themselves of staff at relatively low cost.
Not sure that really makes for a solid basis for a stable economy.
-
Friday 19th October 2012 12:06 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Minimum Legal Payout@Ironclad
"Of course it also makes it attractive for companies to hire in the UK knowing they can divest themselves of staff at relatively low cost."
Actually the cost of getting rid of people isn't important, it's how easy and quickly it can be done. The cost of most reorganisations is considerable, but even if you give people two year's salary, that's still a two year return on the "investment". In terms of the country specific costs, that's largely irrelevant because you don't plan to take on people and make them redundant.
What I didn't notice in the article was mention that earlier this year RIM gave the two "joint CEO's" who got the boot $12m for "loss of office". Now that's worse than the foie gras, in my view, because these two were the architects of the mess. So here's RIM's corporate values for you:
(a) If you are obscenely paid already but incompetent, get given an extra $6m to go away.
(b) If you are a corporate drone doing your best to keep the company going on a middling salary, get told to sod off in time for Christmas with a paltry few grand, and that only because the law says so.
-
-
Friday 19th October 2012 14:59 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Minimum Legal Payout@Ironclad
"One fact you left you was that Mike and Jim reduced their salary to $1 a week in 2011."
And a couple of facts you left off, that Mike & Jim are each worth several hundred million dollars, and were only working for a dollar a month because they'd let the company drift so badly in the first place. So that's +1 to additional research for you too.
I would have thought enough Canadian jobs were being lost that you'd have managed to forget you colonial chip on the shoulder, and understand that this isn't getting at Canucks, but at useless and overpaid executives of whatever colour, flavour or nationality. We've got plenty of them in the UK, if you want more.
-
Monday 22nd October 2012 03:52 GMT Master Rod
Re: Minimum Legal Payout@Ironclad
Yep, typical British....Overpaid executives that walk around mumbling incoherently with their hands behind their backs...What is the point, and who cares. RIM makes some pretty obsolete products anyway. Maybe they should take a look at the Galaxy Note II. Now there is some real Samsung genius...
Master Rod
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Friday 19th October 2012 11:15 GMT paulc
Re: At least Canadian severance is ...
"In UK you get 1 weeks pay for each year worked between 22 and 40 . and 0.5 weeks pay for any other years. Tax free upto £30k."
that's discriminatory and downright ageist... it makes it even cheaper to lay off the experienced older staff and the young fresh intake from schools. I can't believe that is still the actual requirements now that the age discrimination ban part of the Equality Act 2010 came into effect on the 1st of this month...
-
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
Friday 19th October 2012 11:13 GMT Anonymous Coward
Really feel for those guys.
A few years ago, I was paid off as part of a "headcount reduction". It was painful and soul destroying for everyone. One of the very few things that kept us all going was the knowledge that the company at least had the decency to treat us as human beings and offer a package well above the legal minimum.
If RIM are so tight that they only offer the thinnest of safety nets, we know where not to looks for jobs in the future. Vote with your feet lads and make RIM eat their own shit when they get round to recruiting again.
-
Friday 19th October 2012 11:31 GMT Derk
Shear Luxury
I got made redundant in 2009. Thought Oh well, nice little packet heading my for 12 years service. Err no... We are not going to pay you anything, not even this months salary. Eh? We are broke, bust, kaput. Off to the dole I go. Sorry mate you can't get anything here, as your employer has not being paying your NI contributions. My employers in their last year of business awarded themselves big fat pay rises. So company was sold off at £22K by the administrator (sold to the investment firm that put the nail in the coffin previously), Investment firm then sold it on for £128K. It is still running now, with a vastly reduced order book and staff. I got the government minimum after several months. So if these guys get something, as they should. Good for them. Its not the end of the world. I started my own business, never looked back.
-
Friday 19th October 2012 12:26 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Shear Luxury
Your story about your last firm is quite common, sadly. RBS in particular have made a nice business out of doing this to a whole range of companies that they've lent to, in cahoots with the subsequent buyer and the administrators, and I think you'll read more about this
Not only do they shit on the employees, but these arrangements are specifically intended to shit on the investors who owned the original business, and the junior creditors (eg those who have sold things to the company). Key to it is the lender managing to trigger the insolvency of a cash strapped business that is otherwise fairly sound. Often the arrangement is wrapped up as a "prepack" administration, to make it all quick and profitable for the vultures (normally the senior secured lenders, and usually meaning the banks). Sometimes, rather than the banks, it is the original investors who use administration simply to dodge their liabilities, get out of employee obligations like pension commitments and bonuses, as well as losing all the debt the business had previously built up. Companies House should ban directors of insolvent companies from being a director for five years, and the law should ban them from buying the assets of a company they have been a director of at the time, or immediately prior to insolvency.
Not all, but many of these deals are blatant and wilful fraud, but they continue because the goverrnment are (still) in the pocket of the banks, the FSA, well, not worth their own weight in shit, and the SFO are just out of their depth and too slow, and the courts still treat white collar crime as no more serious than parking offences.
To anybody thinking about fraud, go on help yourself! Nobody is likely to catch you, and even if they do the penalties are pathetic.
-
-
Friday 19th October 2012 12:30 GMT Otto is a bear.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
I remember in the 1980's when working on a joint project with employees of a then well known SI, my colleagues from that company being furious that their MD had turned up in a brand new Ferrari and promptly announced major redundancies due to poor company performance.
That company no longer exists, having been long subsumed into a US conglomerate. Can you guess who they were.
I worked then for a French SI then, which, considering its size, unbelievably still exists as an independent, well done Alten.
-
Friday 19th October 2012 15:17 GMT Anonymous Coward
90 days?
Although the minimum for redudancy pay is tiny, most companies pay more when making a large number redundant. Because it is within the staffs rights to ask for a 'consultation period' which takes 90 days, which involves quite a bit of paper work. While this consultation is going on staff receive full pay. (without the tax advantage)
I.A.N.A.L.
-
-
Monday 22nd October 2012 03:25 GMT LateNightLarry
Re: There's worse than "minimum"
Just hope your company isn't owned by Bain Vulture Capital, aka Mutt Romney... BVC would take huge management fees, borrow millions of dollars on the previous value of the company, move the jobs to China and make YOU train your Chinese replacements, move the manufacturing equipment to China (with payment for the equipment directly to BVC, drain your company retirement account, then file bankruptcy for the debt ridden shell that's left. Oh, and they would take down the American flag from in front of the plant while you were training the Chinese replacements, then put it back up after they return to China... Think it won't happen... just ask the employees of Sensata Technologies... the trucks were loaded up last week and sent to Los Angeles for shipment to China... BTW, Mutt Romney still owns 51% of that particular Bain fund.
-
-
Saturday 20th October 2012 08:35 GMT James 100
Could be worse...
They could have been paid in the 90's handsets they were trying in vain to sell...
It's a shame: a promising start, but completely missing the boat on colour screens, smartphone applications, touchscreens - and the one handset of theirs I used had nasty pointy little keys that dug into my fingertips as I used it. I was very sceptical of the iPhone's reliance on touch-screen controls at first, but it does seem to work surprisingly well.
I know BlackBerries had a strong appeal to the guys running the BES, but it seemed to achieve that at the expense of appealing to the guy working the actual handset: the instant they got a choice, RIM were pretty much doomed. I'm impressed how they've found a second chance as the texting device of choice for teenagers in the UK thanks to BBM; quite why there's no cross-platform alternative yet, I don't know!
-
Saturday 20th October 2012 19:47 GMT Manu T
lay offs
The problem with most lay-offs is that they happen in small groups and over a period of time. This is so that the disgruntled ex-employees canb't organise some revenge actions against their former employers.
I would suggest that all ex RIM (or ex-nokia, ex-htc, or any other ex for that matter) try to find out who else got fired. And first reg-group. Organise meetings, this not only gives moral support to one another, but you can make plans. An example is this:
Every corporation has their new-years reception/party. Where big money is spend on food and entertainment. Try to fins out where that party is held and crash it! Perhaps together with the press. I think is let's say 500 ex-employees crashes the new-years party of the CEO's and manager it will get noticed!
There are lots of things you can do. You all know where your ex-boss lives do you? You all know which car he or she drives, do you?
-
Monday 22nd October 2012 13:50 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: lay offs@Manu T
"There are lots of things you can do. You all know where your ex-boss lives do you?"
Two wrongs often do make a right in my book, but not in this instance.
The best advice for those who've been shoved out of the door is to pick themselves up and get on with their lives. Resentful introspection and plotting of revenge won't actually make a difference to the big wigs of the company (who, as a general rule) don't make people redundant for fun, but it will keep the P45ee in a loop of negatvitiy and victimhood. Note to Yanks: P45 is roughly equal to pink slip.
First time I got made redundant, I really thought it was personal, that my manager was a c***, and that life was so unfair. Took me fifteen months to get over it. Now, looking back, I note that I got a barrowful of cash, that in the corporate circumstances there was stuff all for me to do, and that I got out of a job that wasn't actually going anywhere. I didn't and still wouldn't like the manager concerned, but if I bumped inot him I'd shake his hand, say hello, or if at a conference I'd have a coffee with him.
If you're culled, and it is personal, then be bigger than them, and move on. If it isn't personal, then accept that s**t happens, and move on. Either way, you can't turn the clock back, but you can certainly help your chances of new employment by having a positive outlook, and by having the drive to try and create new opportunities for yourself.
This topic is closed for new posts.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
