Re: How about....
Not at all, old chap, I do indeed have my own opinion instead of regurgitating nonsense spewed out by the Daily Mail and the Fox Network, unlike your good self.
Ooh, reputable journalist! Where did you find one of those these days? I prefer my information unfiltered rather than carefully edited by a so-called "newspaper".
I don't doubt that you are well-researched, I just wish you'd accept that others do their own research and may reach different conclusions.
I don't think that anyone's word is gospel (nor do I capitalise the word heaven, that says much about you), but it's an awful lot of effort to fake that much data, and, on the surface and with initial examination, it appears to be genuine; certainly more evidential than anything you've managed to bring to bear to support your fascist, knee-jerk reactionism.
Oh, and on the subject of St. Julian, I will direct you to an earlier post of mine in which I denounce his self-publicity and hypocracy entirely; on this we are generally agreed - the man is clearly a tit of the first order.
Where you and I differ (on this subject in particular, accepting that we differ in many ways beyond it), is that I believe that Wikileaks is a valuable resource and a powerful presence in modern politics and, even if it is flawed, provides a template for future activism against state censorship and secrecy.
So, no, I am not an Assange fan, but I am a Wikileaks supporter and I will occasionally tip my hat to Anonymous for *some* of the things that are done in their name, but not all.
Unlike yourself, I am not absolutist, and when presented with evidence (rather than rhetoric, ad hominem and straw-man arguments such as you present) I will look at it, evaluate it, and where appropriate adjust my opinions.
So, all you have to do is convince me you're right.... Good luck with that while you spit bile and hate in every post.
Alien, because such adaptive thinking will be to you.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
