Secret list of celebrity .xxx domains removed from market

(untitled)

Ridiculous. One can't reasonably justify protecting one person's name but not another's. It's discrimination. Let everyone be in the same boat.

So what about people with creepy views on privacy?

Can we get an ericschmidt.xxx or markzucherberg.xxx?

what if...

You're legal name, heck the one you were born with, is the same as a cleb? Can you still register that domain name if you go into porn?

What will this mean for

Rule 34?

Religionist!

Why the special treatment for the big M? What about buddha.xxx or jesus.xxx etc?

(Is it 'cos M liked little kids?)

Re:What if?

I was wondering the same thing. Of course they'd probably not want the confusion, if it was me (not that I have any such plans) I'd use a stage name.

As to discrimination there's a small point here. It's reasonable to expect that some enterprising person might want to register for example britneyspears.xxx and misuse it, which would lead to legal action sooner or later anyway. Stopping this before it gets that far is responsible. On the other hand I doubt someone will want to register markwhorunsthelocalchippie.xxx and if they did there is a greater chance they're doing it because that's who they really are. It is possible someone might register a domain like that as a form of harassment, however since there is no real financial reward for doing so since the person isn't a famous sex symbol or public figure it would require someone to go a lot further out of their way to do it. Public figures while debatable are probably better off protected since they tend to inspire stronger feelings, and since they're known of by many more people they're a much bigger target for harassment than some random person off the street.

Plus if anyone else wants their name protected they can probably request it. The people protected for free are the kind of people who wouldn't even blink at the costs involved in said protection generally, thus this is more of a courtesy to them that they don't need to do anything. Since they're probably influential in one way or another it's a good business move.

Piers Morgan

If anyone deserves to be castigated in porn, it's him.

http://whois.domaintools.com/jacquismith.xxx

So Jacqui Smith of porno-documentary fame is still good to set up her own site, seeing as she loves it so.

*shudders*

celebrity big brother

Given the current cast, I'd be seriously disturbed if people were looking for anyone other than Tara Reid when it comes to porn!

Real names

This is pathetic. They aren't even their real names, mostly.

And it's not as if they can't afford to register their xxx domain since most of them are loaded.

Pathetic.

Double standard.

Pathetic.

Dead

And why should e.g. michaeljackson.xxx be protected, it's not even a living person (for many years as it turns out) or for that sake mickeymouse.xxx which is a fictional charecter, like harrypotter.xxx also fictional