So does this make the designers and production staff
POD people?
You can guess what 50s SF movie I've got in the pocket.
Hewlett-Packard is still one of the big believers in containerized data centers, and the reason is simple: A select number of customers who are focused on power efficiency, speed of deployment, or both pay HP money to weld these things together and slap a coat of paint on them. At the HP Discover customer and partner …
Pitty the poor bastard who has to service the hot aisle when faced with 7 million BTU flowing through. Not to mention any cables or other components in the hot as hell aisle.
It would be nice to have a more analytical article vs. merely regurgitating HP's marketing BS. What's the price for a redundant power configuration with massive redundant back-up diesel generators, transformers, and UPS systems? When factoring the entire cost of site preparation, the entire facilities installation, etc., what is the real value proposition vs. a more standard, modular approach?