Why???????
Why didn't they put more question marks in????????????????
???
God alone knows, we at El Reg are used to taking a bit of stick, but it's come to something when the nutters crawl out of the woodwork before we've even had a chance to offend. Take the recent Barnes & Noble/Microsoft outrage. Naturally, our top people were instantly on the job, and they also managed to find time to cover the …
And it's not quite Friday, at least here in California ...
Keep up the good work, ElReg ... I may not always agree with all'y'all, but the entertainment factor, combined with actual tech news, makes for a must read over my first cuppa ... Or, rather, in this case, over a couple sips of the must from last year's crush, now turning into wine, before bed :-)
We get that sort of twaddle regularly on the newsgroups, from a few well known sources. The unenlightening email address just confirms that what you have there is the typical troll. Ignore him, don't give him publicity, and maybe he'll go away to annoy somebody else.
(We need a "non-shouty" icon e.g. the same megaphone but with a thick red X through it)
I thought you lot were supposed to be iWhores.
Cockheads? , whatever happend to bell-end, knob-end, dickhead?
"Your all going to hell you den of thieves and crooks". Apart from the lack of punctuation where's the industry-standard 'loosers' taunt? or did it get loost on the way?
maybe 'fail' instead of 'wtf?', needs to put more work in to the bile, poor effort 2 out of 10.
First of all, I object in the most strongest possible terms about whatever article you may or may not be writing about covering some random subject matter in the near or distant future, it's utter drivel you arserags! Just thought i'd get that one in.
I would also like to point out that I believe should the identity of of the "Cockhead"™ bomber be identified, he will no doubt be issued a writ of copywrite infringment by Apple™ for use of the term Cockhead™ which I understand is the generic name given to their litigation team.
Is it Friday yet?
I wish to pre-emptively object to my any future article you publish, or fail to publish. I also wish to pre-emptively object to your publishing or not publishing of my objections to said article(s). Then I wish to object to the article about my objections. Obviously then I will object to my own objections in an everlasting loop.
Why, oh why, oh why????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Have a nice day.
A colleague of mine, in a work argument, got called a dickhead. His response was to craft a set of male genitals from a block of bluetack --- and spend the rest of the day with it stuck to the middle of his forehead.
Ahhh... true dickheads! The world needs you!
(and... Andrew! Where are you know?)