Sign in / up

back to article Backpage.com execs cling to First Amendment in court over sex trafficking case

Two execs at defunct online classifed ads site Backpage will be heading to court on Tuesday, clinging to America's First Amendment in an effort to avoid jail time. Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin's lawyers will be in court in Pasadena, California, on Tuesday for oral arguments in their appeal against the government. Despite the …

COMMENTS

Post your comment
House rules Send corrections
Add to 'My topics' unstar *
  1. Allan George Dyer
    Paris Hilton

    They're making oral... what?

    Synonyms of argument include blowup and finisher.

    4 0 Reply
    1. Aynon Yuser
      Reply Icon

      Re: They're making oral... what?

      I think they meant oral sex.

      2 0 Reply
  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Sledgehammer to miss a nut, more like. The illegal activities claimed to happen on Backpage are still happening just as before, while many thousands of people have seen a safe avenue to ply their trade torn away, and have been forced - literally - back onto the street.

    11 0 Reply
  3. stiine Silver badge
    Thumb Down

    Why didn't you mention...

    That SESTA/FOSTA wasn't actually passed into law until after the charges in this case were filed. While SESTA/FOSTA are bad laws, they don't mean shit to this case.

    8 0 Reply
    1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge
      Reply Icon

      Re: Why didn't you mention...

      But the precedent that you can seize all of someone's assets while investigating a case like this

      3 0 Reply
      1. Eddy Ito
        Reply Icon

        Re: Why didn't you mention...

        Between civil asset forfeiture and the dual sovereignty doctrine, the Fifth Amendment has been dead for years.

        4 0 Reply
  4. rbf

    The only way the prostitution = sex trafficking conflators can prevail against Backpages is by defunding their very able lawyers.

    If Backpages' lawyers get free rein (access to assets) the charges will eventually be tossed and civil rights suits will be pursued. Arpaio got hit with a very expensive judgment.

    1 0 Reply

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

Forgotten password ?

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like