Re: The more this goes on...
I don't claim to have a full overview of HP's product lines, but 2011/2012 was an interesting period for HP:
- the battles with Oracle over the future of Itanium and Oracle support. Itanium was in its wind down phase based on processor development, but Intel/HP weren't ready to admit it to the market at that time.
- Windows 8 was coming but looked like Vista round 2 for PC/laptop sales. The brief boom with Windows 7/Core2 processors wasn't likely to come again in the near future
- the server/storage markets were beginning to see serious movement to cloud based systems, decreasing demand
- legacy storage solutions were seeing significant competition from startups
- competition around it's legacy software products was increasing, and the newcomers were winning
- ink continued to pay the bills
Hurd did very little for HP in my view. He kept on keeping on and the x86 market went through a small boom period, but Hurd did little to prepare HP for the future. Leo tried badly. Meg blamed Leo. And you can see the results.
I can understand HP's (and Leo's) desire to move to a software focussed model as the legacy hardware models were in serious decline, but that required a well executed plan. Instead they got something scribbled on a beer mat in a pub after a few too many. And then dropped in the urinal before being retrieved by a junior assistant the following day. And even then, I might be being generous...