"Enterprise-grade Slack costs businesses from £60 to over £100 per user per year, while Microsoft's shameless clone is free,..."
and this is one of the ways the existing behemoths kill new and interesting developments.
Hipster-friendly chat app Slack frantically wants to turns itself into a development environment to fend off the Microsoft juggernaut. This week Slack added a "Workflow Builder" among other features. In February, it introduced Block Kit APIs to encourage third-party developers to integrate deeper into the avocado-masher's …
Now that Microshaft is apparently worth more than $1T.
IMHO, that is $999B too much but what do I know eh?
All I do know is that I've not spent a bent penny even indirectly with them since 2005.
Their Enterprise 'Walled Garden' makes Apple's effort seem really, really puny.
AFAICT, the entire purpose of Slack is to destroy productivity, with the equivalent of of a PHB hovering over your shoulder at all times, while klaxons sound at random intervals carefully tuned to maximize anxiety. MSFT has decades of experience at this sort of demotivation, from LookOut! to Clippy, so should have an Edge.
recently started a new contract, and they use slack. so I did it on an android device (follow invite link, install app), and it has its use but I need shared files on a desktop machine [not on a slab] and so it made more sense to use github to share files [that and set up a source repository].
Maybe if it were more like IRC, and less 1:1 personal messaging... then again I haven't used it enough to understand all of the features (yet).
Anything that distracts the hordes of bearded ex-barista man-child web "developers" from foisting their cut'n'paste stack overflown buggy shite on us can only be a good thing. See the Indy site for a fine example of all that can go wrong when you let the beards near the internet.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019