back to article Fortnite 'fesses up: New female character's jiggly bits 'unintended' and 'embarrassing'

The maker of super-hit video game Fortnite issued a red-faced apology on Friday after its new female character was seen to have some extra wiggle. The latest "season" of the game started this week featuring a new "skin" – a cowgirl named Calamity. But as gamers quickly noted, when she performs one of the games' trademark …

  1. Oh Homer
    Terminator

    I'm shocked...

    ...to discover that apparently women have breasts.

    Outrageous.

    Such obscenities should be surgically removed, in order to not serve as temptation to closet perverts in denial like me. Clearly this is women's fault for having the audacity to be born female. How dare they defy the laws of PC sensibilities by having bits that go wibble-wobble.

    The human form desperately needs to be streamlined into some shape that can in no way be interpreted as having reproductive capabilities, or even the merest suggestion of offering any kind of pleasure, aesthetic or otherwise. The pinnacle of human development will be the attainment of an utterly joyless existence as androgynous robots.

    But before that happens, please, just kill me now.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: I'm shocked...

      ”Such obscenities should be surgically removed, in order to not serve as temptation to closet perverts in denial like me.”

      Well they’re not known as the Devils Dumplings for nothing!

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: I'm shocked...

      "apparently women have breasts."

      Seem to recall a major argument on an item about how more women were needed in games production was that until women got involved all the male programmers didn't realize that female hps are different from male hips which affects the way they walk. Perhaps Fortnite have ew female programmers who pointed out what happens when women dance.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: I'm shocked...

        Not according to Anita Sarkeesian - Showing the fact females hips move when walking, or that they have breasts is sexist, and incorporated into games purely for the pleasure and lust of male gamers!

        There is a whole genre of videos on Youtube covering this, if you've got time to kill, grab your popcorn... its as funny as hell!

        1. h4rm0ny

          Re: I'm shocked...

          I remember an Anita Sarkeesian one where she was complaining that Ms. Pacman had a bow. Used it as an example of "female stereotyping in videogame culture" or some such.

          Why can't some people just relax a bit more. You know quite a few women like those big breasts as well?

        2. Bernard M. Orwell
          Mushroom

          Re: I'm shocked...

          Anita Sarkeesian is a man-hating, narcissistic, money-grubbing, self-promoting liar of the first order. She is the Katie Hopkins of feminism, and will stoop to any levels to push her made-up illogical and poorly researched agenda down the throats of stupid people worldwide.

          Change my mind.

          1. Tigra 07 Silver badge

            Re: I'm shocked...

            Sarkeesian has been discredited more times than i care to remember. She is a professional victim and makes money promoting her hateful ideology. "Everything is racist, everything is sexist, everything is homophobic". This kind of mentality does nothing but promote hatred and divide society based on whoever has the most victim points being the winner.

          2. Pat Att

            Re: I'm shocked...

            "Anita Sarkeesian is a man-hating, narcissistic, money-grubbing, self-promoting liar of the first order"

            She has some stiff competition from the female opinion writers in the Guardian then.

      2. Tigra 07 Silver badge
        Coat

        Re: I'm shocked...

        "apparently women have breasts"

        Careful now. Write that women don't have penises, or state the dictionary definition of a woman and you're a hateful bigot in 2018...

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: women have breasts.

      I was going to agree with you when I noticed that I, a middle-aged male, too, have breasts. Front and back too.

    4. MyffyW Silver badge

      Re: I'm shocked...

      I rather appreciate the fact somebody has gone to the trouble to model the not-so-simple-harmonic motion my wobbly bits are subjected to.

      I do look forward to Calamity the Cowgirl being fitted with a Triumph Doreen full cup to comply with Fortnite's concerned shock. Make sure you include those thick shoulder straps.

  2. goldcd

    Maybe the internet has jaded me

    But that actually seemed pretty tame and well frankly respectful of the physics of real "boobies".

    Wasn't DOA style moon-gravity balloons, nor original TombRaider giant rigid silicone cones with a ridiculous skimpy clothing mesh applied.

    Yeah, I can see why they've been called out on it - but really?

    Correct response would have been to apologize for the lack of slightly-jiggly crotches on the male characters, and get to work on the mo-cap.

    1. Mark 85 Silver badge

      Re: Maybe the internet has jaded me

      I don't think jaded has anything to do with political correctness or SJW's. Imagine the outrage if a new version of Leisure Suit Larry were released with today's graphics capability.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Maybe the internet has jaded me

        ...or Leather Goddesses of Phobos...

      2. K Silver badge
        Devil

        Re: Maybe the internet has jaded me

        Wow, apparently there was a new version released in 2013...

        https://www.gog.com/game/leisure_suit_larry_reloaded

        But think I may grab it for my Android phone, it'll be a lot safer than the wife finding me playing it..

    2. Charlie Clark Silver badge

      Re: Maybe the internet has jaded me

      I think the breast movement is perfectly fine and nothing like as sexual as nearly all the music videos with women in them. The sooner kids get used to tits bouncing the less they'll obsess about them.

      I'd be more offended by the weird pelvis and hips on the figure.

      1. Missing Semicolon

        Re: Maybe the internet has jaded me

        Actually, I do buy the "accident" explanation. The movement is extremely odd, almost as if the model is wrong.

  3. Inventor of the Marmite Laser Silver badge

    Well

    That raised a titter

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Well

      Titter ye not.

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    For a jiggle animation, this is rather restrained and compares well with a most of the competition... However, I don't believe for a second that it was unintended. They had meetings about this, and chose something they thought they could get away with.

    By the way, I remember a talk claiming that professional animation studios tested their models on porn sites.

    1. K Silver badge

      To prove that the Jiggle animation in games is completely incorrect, I introduce the following evidence:

      https://youtu.be/bxajnypzxh0?t=217

      (Tame, but probably NSFW)

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Her twin sister and a pair of mini-trampolines are added to provide parallel rather than serial* evidence:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-m6yeVODT4

        *IT relevance. It's also a partial review of the GoPro something or other 8.

  5. J. Cook Silver badge
    Coat

    I have bits that go wibble wobble...

    both attached to my chest, and crotch. (mildly overweight bloke here.)

    *gets prodded towards the door* OW! I'm going, I'm going!

  6. james swiers

    time to go to the gym

  7. cornetman Bronze badge

    Well I came here to say pretty much what everyone else has already said, but could I reiterate that I have seen women and they do indeed have breasts and they actually do wiggle a little bit when they dance around.

    Why does this shock anyone?

    1. goats in pajamas

      Shock doctrine

      To be female is to be holy. It automatically ascribes both victimhood and superiority at the same time. The vagina is the holy of holies. But breasts? Breasts are depraved and filthy and anyone who sees one or is made to think of one is at risk of eternal destruction. And as for children? It's well known that young men who view female breasts grow up to be climate change deniers and socialists.

      1. h4rm0ny

        Re: Shock doctrine

        >>It's well known that young men who view female breasts grow up to be climate change deniers and socialists.

        Actually, I think the sort of people complaining that breasts are sexist are actually pretty in favour of socialism. It's no longer some puritan religious Right leading the charge, but left wing SJW types, ime.

        1. acid andy
          Devil

          Re: Shock doctrine

          "Actually, I think the sort of people complaining that breasts are sexist are actually pretty in favour of socialism. It's no longer some puritan religious Right leading the charge, but left wing SJW types, ime."

          Actually, I think it's no longer bigoted old alcoholic armchair critics making sweeping generalizations, tarring whole swathes of the population with a broad, dismissive brush, but El Reg posters.

          As far as I can remember, it wasn't the left that recently banned "extreme" pr0n in the UK.

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Shock doctrine

            You remember incorrectly, from Wikipedia...

            "Section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 is a law in the United Kingdom criminalising possession of what it refers to as "extreme pornographic images". The law was enacted from 26 January 2009."

            1. acid andy
              Boffin

              Re: Shock doctrine

              "You remember incorrectly, from Wikipedia..."

              I was talking about the more recent (and ridiculous) internet restrictions but FWIW Blair and Brown were pretty right wing by yesterday's standards.

        2. Oh Homer
          Headmaster

          Re: Socialists ... complaining that breasts are sexist

          Hello, radical Trotskyist here.

          Love breasts.

          I think the confusion comes from the idea that socialists have an agenda for equality, and are wary that any differences between people, real or perceived, might be abused to cause harmful inequality,

          Note, even the most radical socialist understands that inequality per se is not always harmful. If you have a million pounds, and I have a million and one pounds, that doesn't somehow mean you're going to starve to death, or even suffer in the slightest way, simply because I have one more pound than you do.

          While there is certainly plenty of evidence that perceived or real (but trivial) differences between people do lead to harmful inequality (e.g. unequal pay for women that persists to this day, and more generally the so-called "glass ceiling" effect), the fact is that nothing we do will ever alter the fact that women do nonetheless have breasts, that the cause of discrimination against women therefore cannot possibly be addressed via those breasts, and that in reality the root cause of any and all inequality is an institutionalised problem, perpetuated by an extreme minority of powerful but increasingly geriatric dinosaurs, who thankfully will soon be extinct. And really, even they don't care that you have breasts, they only care about themselves, and see everyone else as subordinates, so they'd discriminate against you even (and probably especially) if you were a carbon copy of them.

          Moreover the concept of "equality" is greatly and probably deliberately misunderstood by socialist-phobes. We don't want to create a planet of clones, we simply don't want people to die needlessly from poverty, while others lavish themselves in obscene wealth, deserved or otherwise. There's nothing in that agenda which suggests women aren't allowed to have breasts, nor that men are not allowed to enjoy them. I think you'll find that the rate of boob-related deaths worldwide is very close to zero, and certainly pales in comparison to death by poverty (e.g. 25,000 children every day, according to UNICEF).

          If you're looking for the actual source of breast or any other sex-related tabooism, and indeed most forms of discrimination and causes of inequality, you need to look way over to the right, where the fanatically religious Conservatives live, and their equally contemptuous but more agnostic neoliberal counterparts.

          1. MyffyW Silver badge

            Re: Socialists ... complaining that breasts are sexist

            I'm pretty certain Nye Bevan would have appreciated a bouncing bosom.

            Herbert Morrison too, although he'd have got a sharp look from Ellen Wilkinson if he got caught.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Unless they use the Berlie sports bra when" the only thing bounding is the ball" (though that advert did show significant jiggling from non-users)

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Why does this shock anyone?

      because SHOCK!!! is good publicity and triggers click-a-baitis, ultimately it translates into (more) money. Every little helps to raise a couple of penis, eh?

      Haven't heard about this game yet? Haven't played? Haven't paid? Are you SURE them boobs haven't been modified yet? Download and pay, and tell ALL your mates about it!

  8. Gene Cash Silver badge

    Old one...

    How do you titillate an ocelot?

    You oscillate his tit a lot!

  9. Chris King Silver badge
    Facepalm

    Obvious question...

    How the hell did this get through QA ?

    (Yeah, I know, rhetorical question and all that)

    1. Valeyard

      Re: Obvious question...

      QA are already having to triage crash bugs in any game that goes live, over what might be found v what is less likely.

      Some guy making a bug that "the boobs bounce" which will mean some remodelling of the digital asset and re-QAing on all its in-game animations will have to sit through the ridicule and jokes that will land shortly after the bug report gets blasted off the system.

      For every bug that "gets through QA" there are a thousand worse ones that didn't, QA in games is just about working with the shitty deadlines you have, where even with 50 hours weeks there's not enough time.

      1. SolidSquid

        Re: Obvious question...

        By which you mean there's thousands of worse ones QA flagged up, but half of them were shipped anyway because it wasn't considered a priority to fix

    2. cornetman Bronze badge
      Facepalm

      Re: Obvious question...

      > How the hell did this get through QA ?

      I'm not sure what the bug report would look like.

      Bug Detail: Female character is *too* realistic? Make it look more like plastic.

  10. keithzg
    WTF?

    There's something very weird looking about that

    Maybe it's how literally nothing else, including her hair, is moving physics-wise in response to the dance other than her breasts? I'm not entirely sure that's it, but whatever it is, that video looks really uncanny and off-putting to me.

    1. tfb Silver badge

      Re: There's something very weird looking about that

      And that's the point everyone else is missing: this isn't just 'this is what physically-accurate models of people do when they dance' it's what physically-hopeless models except for one part do. And, gosh, which part has all the effort gone into?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: There's something very weird looking about that

        Now it makes sense.

        The article was just confusing because it talked about how Fortnite is the only game where breasts behave like they do in real life instead of bouncing around all the time, then it talked about how perfectly somebody had modelled the physics of these ones, to be just like real life.

        The issue is that they're the only realistic part of a cartoony character, that's more understandable.

        As for how long they spent modelling them, I'd suggest they wrote #include <libraryname> and then added two flags to the model. Breast jiggle is modelled using the same algorithms as hair jiggle so it's not like the libraries aren't out there.

        1. Doctor_Wibble
          Paris Hilton

          ... for various meanings of 'realistic'...

          Some time late last century I was amused by the female combatant in an arcade game having very clearly been created by the proverbial spotty teenager, complete with bouncing that was not limited to any particular move.

          This latest one strikes me as more stupid than anything else, and to me proves my contention that 'spotty teenager' is a state of mind rather than a physical description.

          Icon because I'm not sure why anyone would think this was a smart thing to do.

          1. Doctor_Wibble
            Paris Hilton

            Re: ... for various meanings of 'realistic'...

            OK so either there's at least three spotty teenagers I've offended, or three people who think this wasn't bad for PR, or something I had completely missed?

            It's good to know if I've missed the mark but if I don't know how or why then I'll end up offending people again, and it's really annoying if I do that by mistake rather than clearly and obviously after careful forethought and planning.

            1. h4rm0ny

              Re: ... for various meanings of 'realistic'...

              Disagreement is with your last line stating it was dumb to have non-rigid breasts and possibly with the implication that there's something immature about enjoying a sexually attractive character. I think that's the source of your downvotes.

              1. Doctor_Wibble
                Boffin

                Re: ... for various meanings of 'realistic'...

                > ... I think that's the source of your downvotes.

                That helps, though it does suggest some serious over-thinking on their part where there just doesn't need to be any.

                [ TLDR: I meant stupid to assume no complaints on adding that particular feature, really didn't think I'd touch any nerves ]

                Surely you would still be finding the character sexually attractive if the animation did not include the extra jiggle? Though I'm not sure how that's even remotely relevant.

                It's a silly extra feature that was unwise to include without making sure there wouldn't be any complaints and that there would be full management support (ho ho) and that there could be no accusations oif imbalance or improper representation and a whole load of other considerations that are involved in the release of any feature and which it would be stupid to ignore, hence the one-word summarisation that seems to have touched a nerve for some.

                On its own, it's no big deal, and I have no doubt would be a source of amusement for many but I remain unconvinced that the completely mature grown-up decision for its inclusion didn't involve giggling and puerile comments about 'jiggling boobies'.

                Having an understanding of what lies behind the downvotes here means I can now wear them as a badge of pride.

                1. DropBear Silver badge

                  Re: ... for various meanings of 'realistic'...

                  Don't overthink it. Your firm stance is that it was definitely a mistake to include the jiggling. Some of us firmly choose to disagree. That's all. Everything else is just rationalization and extraneous.

                2. edris90

                  Re: ... for various meanings of 'realistic'...

                  So we still are notwe Advanced enough yet to acknowledge the offense originates in the perception of the offended, and as such recognize that their thoughts are their own responsibility and do not apply to the rest of the world. Breasts are universally loved, this is instilled as infants or possibly instinctual. until people get old enough to be taught to hate the sight of them by people with a strategy that seems intent on maximizing opportunities to feel upset, battery warning and feeding into inappropriate emotional reaction

        2. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: There's something very weird looking about that

          > The issue is that they're the only realistic part of a cartoony character, that's more understandable.

          The hilarious bit for me is they way they continue for a couple more jiggles after the dance has stopped!

        3. find users who cut cat tail

          Re: There's something very weird looking about that

          > Breast jiggle is modelled using the same algorithms as hair jiggle

          Hair physics is actually hell -- just ask anyone trying to model long hair realistically in games or animated films. Much more difficult than breasts.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: There's something very weird looking about that

      No, it's just an accurate physics model sponsored by Harmony hair spray.

    3. h4rm0ny

      Re: There's something very weird looking about that

      I just watched it after reading your comment and no, her hair definitely bounces as well. As does the pan on her backpack and her backpack itself. I don't think the breasts bouncing is out of context with anything else. Article is wrong. Anyone disagreeing, have a re-watch.

  11. Michael Hoffmann
    Facepalm

    Meanwhile in World of Warcraft...

    ... the female night elf has been doing a jiggle-bounce animation in idle mode every 30 seconds since 2004.

    (and has a dance that certain people still get up in arms for, even though it's directly based on that of a French singer, said French apparently far more laissez faire about such things).

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Meanwhile in World of Warcraft...

      Back when I played that game I was more annoyed about how many vital organs you could stab past full plate armour on a female character.

      Hint to game devs: This is what a woman in full plate armour looks like

      1. Brewster's Angle Grinder Silver badge

        Re: Meanwhile in World of Warcraft...

        I refer you to this thirty-year old cartoon from Dragon Magazine 140. (And note the cleric on the cover is fully armoured.)

      2. onefang Silver badge

        Re: Meanwhile in World of Warcraft...

        "Hint to game devs: This is what a woman in full plate armour looks like"

        I'm wondering why there's a big hole in the middle you can see all the way through?

    2. onefang Silver badge

      Re: Meanwhile in World of Warcraft...

      Also meanwhile, in SecondLife, jiggly body parts have been around for ages, and not just breasts.

  12. sbt Silver badge

    Storm in a B cup

    That is all.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Storm in a B cup

      Storm in a B cup

      How can you be sure? Cup size is based on the absolute difference between over and under breast measurements round the torso, meaning that the same cup size looks proportionately smaller on women of overall larger build. So if the accompany picture is a B cup, the character needs to be about three feet tall.

      I had to look this up (Wikipedia, I;ll have you know!) and looking at how it is done, bra sizing seems to have all the scientific credentials of phrenology. I suppose they're both about the study of bumps.

      1. imanidiot Silver badge

        Re: Storm in a B cup

        And cup sizing is not even consistent across brands (So I've been told) so finding one that fits seems to involve going into a shop and just trying on a whole load that seem "about the right size".

        There's been some attempts at getting a better system worked out, but from what I've seen it suffers from the old "people aren't used to it so it doesn't get used" and "People don't get used to it because it doesn't get used" problem.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Storm in a B cup

        you've thought about this way too much, anon.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Storm in a B cup

      All breasts are great, writes every man ever.

  13. Alpc

    All women....

    ...should wear cast iron over shoulder bolder holders. End of jiggly issue.

  14. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Rumor has it

    That NASA, ESA and Roscosmos have uhm, "guidelines" requiring female astros to wear some sort of "restraints" precisely to avoid this issue. Turns out that this is also why sportswomen wear sports bras.

    Guess what, large repetitive G-force changes can cause actual pain and soft tissue injury. Whoda thought!

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Rumor has it

      "Guess what, large repetitive G-force changes can cause actual pain and soft tissue injury. "

      A woman friend illustrated the need for a sports bra - "How would you like two bags of sugar swinging about on your chest".

      1. h4rm0ny

        Re: Rumor has it

        Some of us very much. :(

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Rumor has it

        "How would you like two bags of sugar swinging about on your chest"

        Better than having 'em swinging between your legs. Know what I mean, bro?

  15. Bibbit

    Goose and gander

    If that is physics. Could they put some male wobbly pecs/gut/buttock/sack animations in then for the first time in history EVERYONE on the internet will be happy?

  16. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    ”This is unintended”

    Lies.

  17. Random Q Hacker

    We should not be ashamed of our bodies

    Somehow shooting people in the head is OK, but having breasts is not? How very American of us.

  18. Pascal Monett Silver badge

    They call that a dance ?

    It is utterly lame and ridiculous. Epic is right to present excuses, but chose the wrong subject.

    1. Charlie Clark Silver badge

      Re: They call that a dance ?

      Yeah, I figure it wouldn't be just you and me who wouldn't want to stop and watch it on the street.

  19. Bronek Kozicki Silver badge
    Paris Hilton

    I think the apology is badly worded

    They surely meant the apologise for forgetting to stiffen the parts of the upper torso with a sports bra?

    1. TRT Silver badge

      Re: I think the apology is badly worded

      That's an upgrade item.

    2. Trilkhai

      True, that's why it's *not* realistic

      Same thought here, except her movement looks more to me like she's either not wearing a bra, or she's wearing flimsy lingerie — and has falsies made of Jello. Any female with more than an A-cup would at the very least be wearing a supportive bra to exercise, and a sports bra for more vigorous movement like running or jumping. There's no way that girl would be competing without one.

      So for those that aren't quite 'getting it', imagine it's an animated guy: showing that there's something there in an animation is good, but most men probably wouldn't appreciate a detailed outline of the guy's penis/balls boinging with every step as if he's performing jumping jacks while stark naked while aroused. (Boioioioioioing!)

      1. h4rm0ny

        Re: True, that's why it's *not* realistic

        She looks like an Old West character. If the objection were about what's "competitive" they'd have critiqued the large rucksack and cookware, don't you think? Not a lot of sports bras in the Old West.

        As to adding bouncing genitals to male characters and having male characters be naked and at full mast, you're being absurdly over the top in trying to criticize this.

      2. werdsmith Silver badge

        Re: True, that's why it's *not* realistic

        but most men probably wouldn't appreciate a detailed outline of the guy's penis/balls boinging with every step

        I'm guessing you are too young to recall the Linford Christie "lunchbox" ers then?

        https://www.independent.co.uk/news/and-what-inquired-mlud-is-linfords-lunch-box-1165856.html

        Much juvenile mirth was had, even in the Royal Courts of Justice.

  20. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Good grief. More evidence that the world's gone mad.

  21. InNY
    Happy

    That's quite

    Enough titillation for today, thank you.

    :D

    1. John Brown (no body) Silver badge

      Re: That's quite

      "Enough titillation for today, thank you."

      Or, as the programmer/designer/whatever who perpetrated this heinous jiggly crime is probably saying right now, "Infamy! Infamy!, they've all got it in for me!"

  22. BugabooSue

    Wtf?

    I just don’t get understand all this wringing of hands -

    I am a woman. I have tits. They jiggle when I move.

    It’s nature - depending on what I am doing at the time, they may move. A lot.

    Get over it, ffs.

    If people are that offended by jiggling boobies, don’t fucking look.

    Stop this over-the-top PC shit, now!

    1. Kaltern

      Re: Wtf?

      "Get over it, ffs.

      If people are that offended by jiggling boobies, don’t fucking look.

      Stop this over-the-top PC shit, now!"

      I could have gone into a tirade against the lunacy of people with nothing better to do than complain about things that offend them so much they believe EVERYONE should be offended....

      ... but I think BugabooSue said it far more eloquently than I could ever manage.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Trollface

      Re: Wtf?

      I am a woman. I have tits. They jiggle when I move.

      You shouldn't blame yourself.

    3. Charlie Clark Silver badge
      Holmes

      Re: Wtf?

      But let me prove to you just how woke I am by taking offence on your behalf!

    4. imanidiot Silver badge

      Re: Wtf?

      It's because the average USian (even the females) has been indoctrinated all it's life to believe breasts are evil and the root cause of all of mankinds ills. For a people claiming to be all about freedom and liberty the average USian has a weird hangup on tits/boobs/funbags/breasts/etc.

    5. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Wtf?

      It's ageism, my wife used to jiggle delightfully. 35 years on it's more a fond memory.

  23. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Now understand why teenagers are addicted.

    Jiggly boobs forever!

  24. PhilipN Silver badge

    Would you Adam and Eve it

    “Unintended” and “embarrassing” sounds like a two-word summary of the story of the Lady and the Apple

  25. OzBob

    Want to legimitise the boobies?

    Add a baby to it.

  26. nickmorgan

    Unintentional, no coding required here.. bloody AI

    That’s “Weird science man, what can I say, this unreal engine, is tooooo real.

  27. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Having been to a gym class with a similar move

    I can state that looks nothing like reality.

    The actual movement is much bigger, and not like a jelly. (And only looked 'flattering' on one woman, which I guess is down to resonance frequencies, yes I am enough of a geek to think about the physics as well.)

    I would guess that a woman would be highly unlikely to choose such a move as a celebration, unless it was at a natural frequency, because it wouldn't look good and presumably be a bit uncomfortable.

  28. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    "It does make you wonder though how much time games developers spend creating physics models for their own personal entertainment. "

    i would hope most of it. the thought of games developers not having a passion for their work is frankly depressing.

  29. Paul Shirley
    WTF?

    Bloody Boobs - the game

    Anyone looking for something more than the half-assed Fortnite jigglage might find https://store.steampowered.com/app/545250/Bloody_Boobs/ 'interesting', available cheap at https://www.fanatical.com/en/bundle/dollar-carnage-bundle

    Making no comment on the quality of the gameplay (or buying it) ;)

  30. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    The World is Flat...

    Tits dont jiggle.

    Donald Trump is President.

    2018 people.

  31. Nano nano

    coming next ?

    Buttock-wobble ?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019