Please F*&%k off if I wish to send you debugging data when I have an issue I will, otherwise what happens on my hardware is my business, not yours.
Microsoft is rolling out an update to Office products to introduce Windows 10-style telemetry data slurping. Or rather the software business has made it very clear to users it is doing so and they cannot opt out. With a certain piece of European legislation around the corner concerning privacy, the timing is interesting to say …
@shadmeister : very creepy indeed. But, apart from Microsoft and Facebook, you forgot the elephant in the room... The One that in the Darkness binds them, so to speak. You can use Linux/FOSS to avoid all MS telemetry and slurping, use various blockers to dump Facebook and their ilk in the bin, but what do you do with Google ? And I don’t mean just the search engine.
Me? I block google at my router, and avoid using any Google service.
But, to be fair, not really an option for 99.9% of the connected population. Google has some really, really useful services: maps, digitised books, search, mail and lots more - alternatives for some, not for others.
"Google has some really, really useful services: maps, digitised books, search, mail and lots more - alternatives for some, not for others."
I agree for search and mail to some extent (I know we'd all like to have a personal mail server that we control entirely, but it's expensive and complex), but there are a lot of GPS solutions that work quite well. Google maps may be popular because it comes by default on android phones and can be installed on IOS for free, but apple has their maps for IOS not to mention the many satnav providers. I use a GPS app whose main asset to me was that everything was offline (I have a 3gb per month data cap, so that's useful), but now it also has the benefit of not sending data to people. I've never actually gotten any use out of google books. Every time I've looked for something, google gives me a paragraph and tells me the rest isn't available. Either it is, but only if I purchase through google play, or they have the book but I can't have it.
"I know we'd all like to have a personal mail server that we control entirely, but it's expensive and complex"
I run my own mail server, and it's certainly not expensive -- essentially, it's the cost of a domain name registration. Unless you're doing something fancy with it, it's also not that complex. It's probably not something an ordinary user would be willing to do, but it's well within reach of a "power user". However, I'd recommend that if someone wants to do this and has little experience with such things, they should use one of the premade server images instead of setting up from scratch.
I can only imagine it now:
Thank you for sending us this very important data. Customer feedback is important to us, that's why we want to collect more! And, like you, we feel strongly about our environment. So what we do with our software is therefor also our business. That's what you pay us for after all!
Looking forward to getting (much) more data from you!
Your friend Cortana
Maybe there is hope for the world, I've had clients stating they prefer libre office over Microsoft Office, AND actively using libre for their day to day document needs. Shock horror, but Microsoft are doing more to damage their own product then the competition could ever dream of.
They are likely using hostname/s.
If you know what those are for Office tracking, it can be added to the hosts file, assuming it doesn't stop other things from working of course.
This is a good spot to look at....
although I've no idea if this Office info is blocked currently, but it does include Windows 10 reporting domains.. So if Office is using the same domain names, they too would be blocked.
>To argue that if you don't have total privacy then you have no privacy at all nonsense.
A word to the wise (*), about privacy.
Go away for 10 years.
Find a techie guru.
Study hard, think and meditate.
Come back and apply as a junior, would-be techie.
Serve 10 years apprenticeship.
Post a new version of your comment, demonstrating your hard-won understanding.
(*) Flattery in the guise of faux politeness.
Just use this free program to stop Windows 10 and NOW the Office slurp!
Two words of warning, if you use OneDrive disable blocking of it. And, if you KMS (Key Management System) anti-beacin may cause problems.
Also, try this little nugget out: https://peerblock.en.uptodown.com/windows.
And this nugget: http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.zip
None of these slow down any of my boxes, YMMV...........
Given previous form, Microsoft will use the same public IP addresses as vital services for utterly unwanted ones, making blocking near impossible.
You only have to try and use IE browser in protected mode on a server and to access the KB links (linked to in Microsoft logs on a Microsoft OS) that don't work on the Microsoft KB website because
(b) there are many other random resources on the web page that also happen to be "required" for the page to load, or work.
I can't think of a single one that would cause much trouble if I couldn't access it.
Organisations or individuals who share files with you via OneDrive?
Yes, alternatives are available, but this is someone else's choice, so I can't tell them they're idiots and doing it wrong.
Security updates to Windows?
"You only have to try and use IE browser in protected mode on a server and to access the KB links (linked to in Microsoft logs on a Microsoft OS) that don't work on the Microsoft KB website because"
So it's protecting by default against poor admins. Servers should not have general internet access, and that you should not be using a browser on one to view stuff that could be done from a desktop with a standard account.
If you really have to access such links from a server, simply add Microsoft.com to trusted sites. Which can easily be done on multiple boxes via Group Policy.
Although I would suggest that servers should not have general internet access, and that you should not be using a browser on one to view stuff that could be done from a desktop with a standard account.
I actually put this question to our Firewall vendor. We are a corporate customer with a paid support agreement. I put in a feature request to be able to block "Telemetry" from the various software companies. I asked for telemetry to be a category in their web blocker module. They already have a long list of categories like adult, hate speech, advertising, etc. Each category has various sub-categories. I thought that having telemetry as a category, and each slurping asshole company be a subcategory would be perfect.
I knew they would never do it. The pressure from Microshaft, Adobe, etc. would be too much. I just wanted to see them squirm. At first their approach was to ignore the feature request. So when our sales rep called about a major upgrade and support agreement renewal, I told her that we are considering switching to PFSense, and oh, by the way, what about the feature request that wasn't ever answered?
After that little poke, I did actually get an answer from a manager in software development. Their explanation was actually fairly legitimate. They agreed with the need for it, and confirmed that I'm not the first customer to ask for it. They gave me several good reasons why it's not workable. The first was the wack-a-mole problem of many (hundreds of) IP addresses that change constantly. Then, they said that Microshaft has tied Windows Update into the same servers that receive the telemetry. So, blocking the telemetry at the firewall would break Windows Update. There is a similar problem with Adobe they said. If you run Adobe's rent-ware Creative Suite (which we do), it will stop working if you block their telemetry.
So, as long as we have to run the crap from Microshaft and Adobe, we are stuck. If I owned the company, we would be 100% open source. It's possible to run a company on open source, one just needs to have the balls to do it. For us, it's not even all that big of a stretch. Several of our major systems already run on Linux servers, and have both Windows and Linux clients. Others are web browser based, and the client doesn't matter. The killer apps for us are MS Outlook, and Adobe Creative Suite (which to be run on Macs - almost Linux). Man I wish there was an open source replacement for Outlook!
We use MS Office, and we are stuck with it (apparently). Since some of my colleagues work with rather... sensitive information, and since they are not allowed to share some of the data with others even inside the company, and none of us are allowed to share data with the outside world, I wonder (even if we have not yet encountered the nag screens):
- we are not allowed to share data. AFAIK _any_ data.
- the user has to press these buttons
- and now the user seems to be actively in violation of our IT policy...
What now? I just hope that somebody from legal or the IT security group runs into that before I do...
It does rather raise a question: is there a chance of any document data being sent to MS? Since they aren't being particularly transparent about it, it's hard to know (without sniffing the network traffic - and that only shows what they are sending now - not what they'll be sending 3 updates down the road).
I wonder if the MoD use MS Office apps? Maybe if your MP isn't a complete tool (mine is) then it could be worth a letter.
Meanwhile, the bank holiday weekend is a perfect time to send off as many SARs as you possibly can.
Yes. Under "Full", there is:
Enhanced error reporting, including the memory state of the device when program crash occurs (which may unintentionally contain parts of a file you were using when the problem occurred)
So at the very least, "Full" reporting must not be enabled (and I would say must be blockable administratively) in any environment where confidentiality is important.
If it isn' t possible to block users from selecting "Full" then I suggest that Microsoft Office is not suitable for use in Business and Government environments.
Our company takes this thing seriously, more than "my 9 column table in a word document doesn't align", so we no longer use Windows. We tried to hold back on Win7 for as long as possible (not sure what we where waiting for), but decided the only path forward was Fedora (the cinnamon spin).
In our industry, security trumps convenience.
Why not LTSB? It's still not enough. The data capture code is still there, disabled by a single bit. A buggy update or accidental misconfiguration, and... boom! And let's face it, the data slurp is just the tip of the iceberg.
I'm using Fedora Cinnamon too. Rock solid - only added Gnome Terminal as Cinnamon expects this and also Gnome Software Center which makes it easier to find software.
Can't say I'm really surprised from Microsoft - so much for "Gmail Man" or "Scroogled". I stopped using Microsoft products years ago because of the data collection. LibreOffice works just as well - I have yet to find an incompatibility with Microsoft Office providing you install the MS core fonts in Linux.
"Why not LTSB?"
Because it's not for standard use - it's for things like standalone kiosks that will never get updated. It's for instance specifically stated as not for any use that requires MS Office. And Office Pro Plus 2019 wont run on it at all.
"The data capture code is still there, disabled by a single bit."
LTSB has the exact same telemetry features as the standard Windows 10 for Business release of the same time.
"Enhanced error reporting, including the memory state of the device when program crash occurs (which may unintentionally contain parts of a file you were using when the problem occurred)"
Translation: unintentionally = inevitably
Back in the days pre-Y2K, I was a postdoc researcher in space debris impact science, we had various bits of data about the properties of highly compressed metals we were using (for entirely peaceful purposes) that originally came from one of those ^^^ .
The nice guys who let us play with their data would have been rather unhappy at the thought of, say, a (very strictly internal!) report that included such gems being exported to wherever MSoft decided to send it.
I vaguely seem to remember that thermite was one of their recommended disk-disposal methods to ensure compliance with arms non-export / non-proliferation regulations, when more serious tools weren't available. Just imagine the help-desk call for that one.. Hello, I have reason to believe you've just slurped some nuclear secrets. Where do Uncle Sam's guys with the thermite need to go to ensure that it doesn't proliferate?
@Chris Hills If you work for a public organisation where confidentiality is paramount, you may well have tried to get rid of MS already. You will have failed because it is beyond the understanding of very important people that there is any alternative.
The only thing you may be able to do is talk to your MP.
"This is not something you can lobby your MP about. It's a simple market choice. If you do not like what the software does, go elsewhere."
Obviously, the lobbying bit is about the state trying to get off their MS dependency. And in so doing, making MS change their ways, or go away.
>It does rather raise a question: is there a chance of any document data being sent to MS?
'Full data includes everything collected with Basic data, plus additional information that enables Microsoft to fix and improve its’ products for all users. The following list includes examples of the additional information Office collects at the Full level.
I don't know about your reading of the above statement, but mine is that some 'examples' follow but, as they are examples, anything and everything that we are not listing could also be collected at our discretion, to 'improve' products.
I expect that most people on this forum, certainly programmers, can spot such deliberately misleading reassurances a mile off (For those who can't, do you work for a company like TSB?)
"I'm guessing that the Office ADMX templates will be updated to reflect these changes too, and I'll just add them to the policy."
That's the problem though - it's just a guess. There's no real reason that Microsoft would do that unless they get asked, specifically, by customers. And even then, what are the chances that those high-paying customers will receive special builds?
Vapourware won't keep legal happy.
"There's no real reason that Microsoft would do that unless they get asked, specifically, by customers."
"And even then, what are the chances that those high-paying customers will receive special builds?"
Close to zero - the Office 365 install that most use is regularly updated. They can easily add such a feature if not already there.
All well and good till Microsoft decide to deprecate the Group Policy Object in question, which they do have form for. From windows 1607 - 1803 The option to customise /turn off settings in the notification center, changed its name or was removed completely. This can make changing settings in GPO a bit useless at times when the target is constantly moving.
Abandon MS Orifice, particularly 'Virus Outbreak' (aka 'Microsoft Outlook') and switch to Libre Office.
That's my suggestion. Don't worry, the cost savings and increased security/privacy will outweigh any "disadvantages" that might occur along the way. Once everyone gets used to it, you're all set!
Are dumps not a dump of memory so that the flaw can be found?
What about when that flaw is directly related to a user's data?
MS's descriptions of what is sent:
At the Basic level we collect only data necessary to keep Office programs up to date, functioning properly and secure. Basic data includes information about the program itself, the proper function of Office, and basic error data. We collect the following data at the Basic level:
- Connectivity and configuration data such as the version of Office in use; and the name, version, and publisher of any add-ins installed and being used in Office
- Whether Office is ready for an update and if there are factors that may impede the ability to receive updates
- Whether updates install successfully
- Data about the reliability of the diagnostics collection system
- Basic error reporting, which is health data about the Office programs running on your device; for example if a program such as Word hangs or crashes
Full data includes everything collected with Basic data, plus additional information that enables Microsoft to fix and improve its’ products for all users. The following list includes examples of the additional information Office collects at the Full level.
- Additional data about Office connectivity and configuration beyond that collected at the Basic level
- Application usage, such as which Office programs are opened on a device, how long they run, which processes they use, and how quickly they respond to input
- Enhanced error reporting, including the memory state of the device when program crash occurs (which may unintentionally contain parts of a file you were using when the problem occurred)
- To help you get the most out of Office, we may tell you about features you may not know about or that are new
Under Full, there is definitely potential for confidential information to be sent.
>Contain absolutely no memory contents
So perhaps they contain information made up by an AI reading a bedtime story?
Last time I used computers the place where they do stuff (process) with stuff (data) was in memory. Perhaps you could explain what 'crash dumps' contain that doesn't come from memory?
"If you check, you can see exactly what Canonical collect (if you enable it), as they'll let you view the data they collect, and it's pretty minimal stuff. They're a world apart from MS here..."
"The link you posted was for something only available to "Windows Insiders", whatever those are."
Becoming a Windows insider just means ticking a box under Windows Update to get advance builds.
And Erm, nope - it was generally released back in April so you no longer need to be an insider to get it.
Still worlds apart. You can *completely* opt out of data collection in Ubuntu. The information collected is easily readable by a human. You cannot opt out of data collection in Windows and the information collected is not easily human readable - the screenshots of the data viewer look like something only a programmer could decipher. Hardly understandable by Grandma.
Worlds apart on what data is collected too. Ubuntu would collect this:
* Ubuntu Version
* Network connectivity or not
* CPU family
* Disk(s) size
* Screen(s) resolution
* GPU vendor and model
* OEM Manufacturer
* Location (based on the location selection made by the user at install). No IP information would be gathered
* Installation duration (time taken)
* Auto login enabled or not
* Disk layout selected
* Third party software selected or not
* Download updates during install or not
* LivePatch enabled or not
* Popcon would be installed. This will allow us to spot trends in package
usage and help us to focus on the packages which are of most value to our users.
* Apport would be configured to automatically send anonymous crash reports without user interruption.
The list of stuff Windows collects exceeds the word limit on Reg comment posts.
Still, they could collect personal data anyway in crash dumps or other telemetry information, none of those data are essential to deliver the service, and that's not compliant with GDPR.
If ever my installation starts to nags me, I think I'll send a request to stop it and delete any personal data they could have collected - I just have to wait for tomorrow...
"Still, they could collect personal data anyway in crash dumps or other telemetry information, none of those data are essential to deliver the service, and that's not compliant with GDPR."
It is compliant if a) you agree to it, and / or b) the data is effectively anonymised, or c) inadvertently collected data is deleted as soon as it is identified.
How about simply disconnecting from the network whenever a MS Office app is running? Unless something in the background calls home as soon as the network is reconnected, MS _can't_ slurp a damn thing... can they?
Failing that, wouldn't tightening up the firewall rules block slurpage?
Unplugging temporarily from the network does (I think) stop the flow of telemetry. However you can guess that it is being buffered for later transmittal when the circuit is restored.
Blocking IPs at the firewall might work as long as you had the full list of them that could be used. I'm sure MS invested in many blocks of IPs way back when and can switch them around as needed. After all, that's how the other data pirates do it.
Microsoft Word 2016 for MAC, no option to send NO diagnostic data.
True, but you can simply close the window. It's a breach of European law for Microsoft to start collecting data through a one-sided change in the T&C's, ie. explicit consent still applies. Idiots will have to roll this back.
I think instead of complaining about the unacceptable amount of privacy invasion, people should ask themselves: why are they putting up with it? How many pokes in the eye do people need?
There's no point whinging about it, it falls upon deaf ears. Either stop using it, or suck it up (and so will they).
MS would find it too humiliating to ditch its core products and simply switch over to Linux and other FOSS, so it is instead getting us to do the dirty deed for them. They must have swung a long way from Ballmer's stupid tosh about destroying Linux.
Making Win10 (everything from W8 onwards) a steaming pile of manure was the start. But to make these OSs even more repugnant, spyware was included. Then, noticing that people were still stupid enough to pay money for Office, even the crippled mouthbreathing 365 version, they've had to poison those products as well, in a further bid to alienate customers. Perhaps if there are still holdouts next year the crappy Ribbon interface will swell to half the screen, or be rendered in bright purple ... anything to get rid of customers.
There are a few folks loitering here to downvote any post mentioning Linux and LibreOffice (I hope that's a remunerative activity) so please do so now, while I point out that the open-source combination—
• Has all the features the vast majority of people actually need and use
• Is free
• Doesn't contain uncheckable proprietary code
• Doesn't spy on you
• Doesn't require an internet connection
• Doesn't trash your system after ambushing it with a largely useless "update"
• Doesn't try to kidnap you into anyone's "ecosystem"
—and a no-brainer for anyone not trapped in the world of corporate idiocy.
Given the last decent (and in fact, pretty good) version of Windows was Win7, it'll be interesting to see, when support for that finally ceases in a couple of years, how many people will finally ditch MS and all its parasitic attempts to ensnare, trap and exploit customers. I don't underestimate the power of laziness, stupidity, complacency and wilful victimhood to keep people gormlessly pedalling the MS treadmill, but I'll be surprised if the end of Win7 doesn't cause a fairly spectacular spike in migration to Linux and FOSS.
Now, vote ↓ happily!
All my exposure to Microsoft now is just two products:
1) Windows 10, which came on my new machine. Was using Windows Vista previously until the old machine gave up its ghost.
2) Office 2007, volume enterprise license, which requires no activation.
I have already stopped using Hotmail/Outlook long ago. Stopped using Skype (MSN Messenger had previously merged into Skype). Never used a Microsoft browser. Never cared for Onedrive. Never played XBox, Minecraft. Don't have a Linkedin account. Never installed Swiftkey on my phone. No Kin, Zune, Bing, Windows phones.
My only beef with Linux is that I have tons of stuff in NTFS partitions, and I want to keep the NTFS formatting. I am inclined towards getting a Mac in future. I'm still using Windows because of legacy win32 and vintage gaming stuff, including but not limited to emulators. And I don't want to run everything through WINE.
My only beef with Linux is that I have tons of stuff in NTFS partitions, and I want to keep the NTFS formatting.
I dual boot W7/OpenSuse at work. All my "data" is on NTFS discs and is accessible from both OSes, though OpenSuse doesn't by default mount the NTFS units.
• Has all the features the vast majority of people actually need and use
Still lacks many features many people need to use,
• Is free
Who cares? Do you work for free? Are your pocket money too little?
• Doesn't contain uncheckable proprietary code
Windows code can be accessed if you have the requirements to access it
• Doesn't spy on you
Like Ubuntu which is starting its telemetry as well? Or just look at how Android and Chormebooks spy on you as well...
• Doesn't require an internet connection
Sure, you never need updates... c'mon!
• Doesn't trash your system after ambushing it with a largely useless "update"
I've seen Linux systems trashed by updates as well.
• Doesn't try to kidnap you into anyone's "ecosystem"
No, it's just try to kidnap you into the GPL ecosystem - which is just nasty as the Windows one.
Choices are good. Forcing everybody into a single choice like Linux and its GPL ecosystem is bad as well, even if it's free. Actually, often there are *less* choices under Linux because there's no incentive to competition, so everybody just uses the same services, applications and tools - a huge lock-in.
Unfortunately you are making the assumption that a significant amount of people give a shit, and give enough of a shit to do something about it.
Unless Linux is an option from new the vast majority of users will never change from what they are provided initially. Changing operating system = new PC to them.
And Linux (which I like don't get me wrong) can be an utter shit to fix if it doesn't work.
You'd maybe, maybe, get people to switch to something like ChromeOS or iOS if you told them it was the same as their phone / tablet that they like.
By the way, LibreOffice supports the ribbon (aka "Notebook bar") : https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/02/how-to-enable-libreoffice-ribbon-notebook-bar, and it's slightly customisable.
You can even have the menu, toolbars, and ribbon at the same time. They did it right: you get to choose.
>>They must have swung a long way from Ballmer's stupid tosh about destroying Linux.
If you were not aware, Windows 10 can now run Linux apps and userland without a Linux kernel. Server 2019 is likely to do the same with containers. Embrace and replace still seems to be the approach.
Basically, if MS in any way valued the security and confidentiality of the people who use their software, they would provide a NONE option, and would also make all settings opt-in rather than opt-out. But, the only thing they value is the data they collect, and the more of it the better. MS are truly pond-slime these days, and probably at least as untrustworthy as Facebook (and I personally think Zuckerberg should be expelled from humanity and cast away on a space rock)
"Basically, if MS in any way valued the security and confidentiality of the people who use their software, they would provide a NONE option,"
If they did so, the Windows ecosystem would look a _lot_ different. They would be running regular massive code audits. They would strive to make their systems simpler instead of re-inventing the wheel every few months. They would depreciate and remove VBA from their office products.
However why should they do so? The remaining users of their software are either forced to use it, or they obviously don't care about security and confidentiality.
No, seriously, thanks. Thanks for making it so much easier to finally rip this crap root & branch out of our organisation as I can now add GDPR compliance as an argument why we should spend LESS on Office software. There are substantial barriers against deploying LibreOffice in an Enterprise:
- the split LibreOffice installer is basically utter tripe in any other language than American (which is <> English);
- the stubborn refusal to support the entry method for accented characters on MacOS (which is <> English), which we countered by buying NeoOffice (als takes care of the first issue, but only on MacOS).
But, thanks to GDPR and the promised fines, the Microsoft data slurp has now reached the point where even the C-suite is getting cold feet, and we've been asked for alternatives.
So, once again, thanks. I've been waiting for this for quite some time - and it means more budget left for beer :)
Apple has for over a decade, rigged things so that when there's a problem the users get a little dialog box _asking_ them if they want to send info to Apple. If they click on 'yes', the data goes. If 'no', nothing is sent. If you click on the right buttons on the dialog, Apple will specify just what info goes. Apple collects the info anonymously, unless you put something identifiable into the comments section yourself. See http://i.i.cbsi.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2012/05/10/TextEditLocationCrashReport.png for an example.
Microsoft copies EVERY FUCKING THING THAT APPLE DOES, after a few years delay. WHY ON EARTH COULDN'T THEY JUST COPY THIS, TOO?
Oh. Yes. I can think of a reason why. Cretins. They're cretins. And they've made their last sale around here.
When the Microsoft leadership transitioned from Ballmer to SatNad, the folks at Redmond figured out that selling data and subscriptions is a far better business model than peddling new versions of the same software every few years. It's all about the CLOUD (Microsoft's computers) now.
This is in part due to the paranoia at seeing declining PC sales and Microsoft's failure to break into the mobile phone market. Microsoft needed to 'reinvent' itself.
That's why Windows 10 is the way it is; masquerading as a mea culpa for Windows 8 but in reality a data slurping platform to manifest this brave new business model.
On the enterprise side of things, Microsoft is copying Amazon and Google. The only aspect I see Microsoft copying Apple is opening retail stores and peddling the Surface devices, taking aim at iPads and MacBooks and Macs. On the gaming front, it's battling Sony and Nintendo when it comes to consoles, and battling Steam for the digital content distribution rights (the latest Age of Empires game is a Microsoft app store exclusive) of PC games.
The takeaway from this is Microsoft is too big and has its fingers in too many pies. There is a lack of focus (purchased Linkedin?). Microsoft has an identity crisis.
If I have the fine correct, the EU could fine Slurp 4% of their world-wide gross which would be a tidy sum. It should catch the eye of various feral regulators as this would hit the P/L statements very hard. As I remember, if you have any European customers/activity you are subject to GPDR. Get hit once for Bloat and Orifice and that could total 8% of their gross.
The Full level does a bit more, giving Microsoft carte blanche to nag helpfully inform users about functions and features that might be of interest.
Microsoft, via its support website, was at pains to point out that no personal data has been deliberately collected, and there is no way to identify a netizen from the slurped information.
These two statements seem to be contradicting each other. Which is it? Anonymous or identifiable for all the helpful features?
the next PC purchased for use at Roach towers will be a dual boot win10/ linux mint thing (mostly likely from Novatech) with the majority of the time spent in mint.... and win10 for gaming only.
If only because I want the the only data m$ slurps from me to be about how many kerbals I've just killed....
COMPARE A: To B:
"Microsoft Chairman Thompson expressed distaste for companies whose ad-financed businesses share or sell user data, while declining to comment on Facebook Inc. specifically. “Many of them make money off ads and they have used that as kind of a leverage point,” he said of user data. “At Microsoft, we don’t believe in that.”
....."When we talk about why we're upgrading the Windows 10 install base, why is that upgrade free? MS CFO asked during a meeting with Wall Street analysts. These are all new monetization opportunities once a PC is sold. Microsoft's strategy is to go low on consumer Windows licenses, hoping that that will boost device sales, which will in turn add to the pool of potential customers for 'Advertising'".....
....."CEO Nadella has referred to the customer revenue potential as 'lifetime value' in the past -- and did so again last week during the same meeting with Wall Street -- hinting at Microsoft's strategy to make more on the back end of the PC acquisition process. The more customers, the more money those customers will bring in as they view 'Ads'".....
"“Many of them make money off ads and they have used that as kind of a leverage point,” he said of user data. “At Microsoft, we don’t believe in that.”"
Someone (a big Chairman, no less) at MS said that in 2018? That's quite funny! Can't be very up to speed with what MS is up to.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019