Same old story.
The devs gets the complaints but the PHCB get the cash.
So how much was their take from this "criminal facilitation" to coin a phrase?
Enquiring minds.....
Russian programmer Mark Vartanyan has been sentenced to five years in US federal prison for developing and spreading the Citadel malware that stole $500m (£383m) from bank accounts around the world. Citadel is a variant of the Zeus banking Trojan, the source code of which leaked online in 2011. These software nasties could …
Probably not.
That money would have gone to the people who bought, and used their software.
Those guys (Point Headed Criminal Bosses) have the $30m.
What he got depends on how many copies (and support contracts) they sold, and how long their support ran.
Probably enough to keep the wolfski from the door, but I'd strongly suspect << $1m.
If someone is making guns without a permit, and sells them to people for the sole use to commit crimes, they go to jail and you never hear of them again.
Your analogy is dumb, as firearms are sold as defensive weapons, like antivirus is. Then abused. Just like cars are used to kill more people than any other device sold, it depends on the purpose of the thing and operator.
If Vartanyan was making software like a text editor, or AV, or even a pen testing tool, sure he could be found not guilty. But that's not what he did, he intentionally facilitated criminal activity.
Personally, I think he should have his fingers removed, yah, and the bank robbers too - electronic or in person. I have no mercy for those that would take what others work for.
It used to be possible in the US, until 2005 when a law was passed making it impossible to sue an arms manufacturer for unlawful killing. (You can still sue if your gun is defective and fails to kill people).
As someone with no legal knowledge whatsoever, I'd advise the writers of malware to join forces and create the National Malware Association, and once they manage to get funding to similar levels to the NRA, then they should be able to get laws passed to make malware great again. After a few years it could be legal to concealed-carry malware, purely for self defence of course.