back to article OpenWRT and LEDE agree on Linux-for-routers peace plan

Competing Linux-for-routers distributions OpenWRT and LEDE will soon vote on a proposal to heal the schism between the two. OpenWRT is often used as firmware for small routers, largely SOHO WiFi kit. But in March 2016 a group of developers decided they didn't like the directions OpenWRT was taking and forked the project by …

  1. Your alien overlord - fear me

    Sounds like a money spinner for the guys who started it, but what is in it now for the end users?

  2. Mage Silver badge
    Linux

    Forks and Choice

    Forking can be good, sometimes it's just ego.

    I never exactly understood the reason for this particular split, so I don't know.

    OpenOffice -> LibreOffice, MySQL -> MariaDB, Hudson -> Jenkins forks all have one common explanation. Oracle. Actually even Davik vs JVM and C# from J++ are result of Sun/Oracle pressure and licences (J++ was too like Java, but not Java. The "full" Desktop Java is "free", but you have to licence a cut down version for phones, Sun or Oracle wouldn't agree a price for the free desktop version for phones, hence Davik. Google bought in Android)

    The Linux Desktop GUI forks made sense too, as some teams drank the the worst MS & Apple "koolaid" and went for either "eye candy" or a fantasy cross device (one GUI for phone, tablet, TV and Desktop inherently is always going to be a failure). Choice between Classic Xerox 1976 principles (Older Mac OS, Win9x/Win2000 as in Mate with Redmond Theme), Ultra-flat and daft 3D eye-candy as a user preference seems a good idea.

    I can understand the Systemd vs Unix Init split, even though I don't understand the details, nor know which is "right", thus choice is good.

    1. iTheHuman

      Re: Forks and Choice

      Dalvik is a register based vm.

    2. Len Silver badge

      Re: Forks and Choice

      I was active in the OpenWRT community but sort of zoned out about a year before the split so am not completely on top of it. From what I gather from the dev mailinglist, however, is that is not necessarily an issue in the code itself that was a reason for the fork. I get the sense that it was more of a context / project management thing. A chunk of developers wanted to use more modern dev tools (I believe moving to GitHub for instance), faster dev cycles etc. but the lead maintainer of OpenWRT wasn't too keen on it.

      Considering the unhappy coders were a fairly large chunk of all active coders, a fork was easily done and it looks as if LEDE very quickly overtook OpenWRT as the more active one. An OpenOffice/LibreOffice analogy comes to mind.

      I just hope they take the best bits of both projects (I wouldn't have minded if they kept the LEDE name but I get the resistance to dropping the well-recognised OpenWRT name). The LEDE website is a lot better than OpenWRT's one if you ask me and I hope they use this opportunity to sort out all their documentation and hardware compatibility tables as they were always all over the place, lots of redundancies etc.

      1. Dwarf Silver badge

        Re: Forks and Choice

        DD-WRT forked from OpenWRT too.

        I've used OpenWRT and LEDE on a number of devices (a bunch of BT HomeHub5's) and it seemed a bit fragmented as to which site / code base one was best for any one topic. LEDE seems to be better in terms of functionality and the overlay file system is great for config and upgrades (run sysupgrade and you are done), but the documentation on how to tweak a particular router seemed more up-to-date on the OpenWRT site. I just hope that they merge the "good" from both projects - like dropping the pointless drinks recipe from the login process

        I kind of expected the target project to be called something like LibreWRT, but I guess that OpenWRT has a certain heritage.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Forks and Choice

      "I never exactly understood the reason for this particular split, so I don't know."

      Nothing too serious some good willed souls couldn't overcome:

      - governance & organization

      - tooling

      - minors issues

      I'm very happy with this outcome.

  3. taxythingy

    Sounds legit

    This should work out ok. If my reading is up to scratch, the current LEDE branch will become the base, with some improvements brought over from OpenWRT.

    Assumes of course that the reason(s) the LEDE devs left have been sorted out.

  4. Ole Juul Silver badge

    Doesn't bother me

    Besides, I use Tomato on all my routers.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Doesn't bother me

      Do you also have scales (or feathers according to some paleontologists) and limber around on two legs while emitting thundering noises and the pesky mammals scurrying under your feet?

      Tomato is beyond prehistoric and has not fixed a long list of issues for a nearly a decade. It a paleontological exhibit worthy of a place in the museum of technology, not actual production use.

      Do not understand me wrong - it was great in its day. It was the first proper open source embedded build. That was about a decade ago.

      1. Ole Juul Silver badge

        Re: Doesn't bother me

        "Tomato is beyond prehistoric and has not fixed a long list of issues for a nearly a decade."

        Hmm, we have different information. Last release of Tomato Shibby is May 8, 2017.

        1. MrRimmerSIR!

          Re: Doesn't bother me

          Indeed, for those not in the know...

          http://tomato.groov.pl/?page_id=78

    2. DropBear Silver badge

      Re: Doesn't bother me

      "I use Tomato on all my routers."

      Oh, so yours are too old to fit anything newer in the NAND too... ;)

      "Tomato is beyond prehistoric"

      I found it thoroughly amusing that at the time of the Great Heartbleed Extinction Event, Tomato turned out to be immune due to its sheer, uh, age...

    3. regadpellagru

      Re: Doesn't bother me

      "Besides, I use Tomato on all my routers."

      So, if you see no Need of anything above 802.11g, I can surely sell you my old WRTG54 ...

      Make me an offer ! I think, for outrageously outdated Museum stuff, you could cough out 200 E/box ...

      1. Ole Juul Silver badge

        Re: Doesn't bother me

        "So, if you see no Need of anything above 802.11g, I can surely sell you my old WRTG54 ..."

        Those work just fine, but I've got lots of memory in my newer ones. In any case 802.11g is, as you know, a wireless protocol, and has nothing to do with routing.

        1. Swarthy Silver badge

          Re: Doesn't bother me

          Well, as my tweaked router (Tomato) is a WRTG54....

  5. Norman Nescio Silver badge

    BearDropper

    I hope merging stabilises things. I'm a great fan of OpenWrt and LEDE, but the LEDE update to then current OpenWrt code broke the BearDropper app (which is a kind of Fail2Ban, written as an OpenWrt shell script), and I don't have the time to develop the skills to fix it myself.

    It pushed me to move SSH to a non-standard port number* on the routers controlled by me, which was good, because all the automated access attempts on the standard SSH port were irritating me (they weren't going to get in, but they kept filling up the log).

    I have a mixture of OpenWrt, LEDE and DrayOS (Draytek) routers, and I far prefer the OpenWrt/LEDE approach. SSH access to the Draytek devices from Linux appears to be 'somewhat' buggy, and getting some bog-standard VPNs up seems to be harder than it should be - but that could be my ignorance/idiocy at work.

    *Top tip: add a firewall rule allowing access for the new port number BEFORE changing the Dropbear config. That way you don't have a long journey to re-enable access to remote routers.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: BearDropper

      the Draytek devices from Linux appears to be are 'somewhat' buggy

      FTFY.

      4 months late.

  6. sitta_europea

    Does this mean they'll start properly supporting the WRT54GS chipset now? I walked away from OpenWRT when the response to my problem (nothing serious, just the router hanging and dropping all packets if you tried to get more than 1Mbit/s throughput) was (let me think... oh, yes...)

    "Can't be arsed, they should have designed the chipset better".

    The conversation is right there in the mailing list.

  7. Michael Thibault

    Un-hunh

    "burying the LEDE brand"

    Journos! Sigh.

  8. ldir

    Still not re-merged

    As of 13 Sept 2017 the merge still hasn't occurred. And LEDE is miles ahead of openwrt now. So... *USE LEDE* !!!!

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019