back to article Invasion of the virus-addled lightbulbs (and other banana stories)

Yikes, all I have to do is go away for a couple of weeks and all hell breaks loose. But at least it’s the right kind of hell: that is, the veritable technological hell that I’ve been predicting in these columns for years. First off as I sit back in my late-vacation sun lounger to read the news on my tablet is that the Krebs on …

  1. Dan 55 Silver badge

    I think we've got our culprit

    'The right kind of hell' is it? Spent years 'predicting' this have we? 'Go away' when it happened did we? Case closed. Come with me sunshine.

  2. Doc Ock

    How to defend yourself when being attacked by a man with a banana and other assorted fruit:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JgbOkLdRaE

  3. A K Stiles Silver badge
    Terminator

    Third time (un)lucky?

    That's the third time this week that I've seen reference to that bloody toaster from Red Dwarf! Admittedly one was my own comment on another story and the second was someone else's comment on yet another story... I think the toasters are coming for us!

    (or maybe, just maybe, there are enough technoprats inhabiting these reaches that we all have common memories/nightmares about that bloody toaster?)

    1. Gary Moore's Plectrum
      Terminator

      Re: Third time (un)lucky?

      Given that God is infinite, and that the Universe is also infinite...would you like a toasted teacake?

      1. Munzly The Hermit

        Re: Third time (un)lucky?

        or, n fact, a tasted toecake!

    2. tfewster Silver badge
      Facepalm

      Re: Third time (un)lucky?

      But the toaster reference is a necessary reminder, as it shows the evangelists statement hasn't been thought through:

      "The trick, then, is making sure the AI is focused on doing something sensible rather than letting it decide for itself what it should do based on a limited sensory experience of real life."

      And take the AI lightbulb: Its prime directive is to make light. But it can't do that if it burns out, so it has to preserve itself, by killing the meatbags who keep using it, and blowing up the power stations that are sending lethal voltages at the poor oppressed lightbulb.

    3. Valerion

      Re: Third time (un)lucky?

      You seem upset. How about a nice piece of toast?

    4. Robert Carnegie Silver badge

      Re: Third time (un)lucky?

      UKTV Dave channel is showing new episodes of Red Dwarf. And also is showing lots and lots of old ones. So maybe that is the reason.

      The primary application I see for AI is to trade shares on Wall Street faster and more intelligently than less intelligent programs do. As a side effect, it will not take long before the AIs own all of our stuff, if they don't already. That's the real machine apocalypse. Followed by universal ransomware.

      1. EddieD

        Re: Third time (un)lucky?

        http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/10/07/robot_traders_blamed_for_flash_sterling_crash/

        Maybe not such a good idea. I vaguely remember automated trading systems being blamed for Black Monday in '87.

        Maybe we should leave AI until we've worked out what real intelligence is, and if in fact it really exists.

    5. Kubla Cant Silver badge

      Re: Third time (un)lucky?

      Just seen the following error message from an application that has nothing whatever to do with toast:

      angular2-toaster.js:2Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'Toast' of undefined

      Coincidence? I think not. But if the toasters' plan to exterminate humanity is executed with the same efficiency they bring to their primary toasting function, then we have little to worry about.

    6. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

      Re: Third time (un)lucky?

      We are interrupting this thread for an important message from The Toast Marketing Board.

      Have you had your toast today?

      1. revdjenk

        Re: Third time (un)lucky?

        You're a crusty old codger, eh?

    7. Captain DaFt

      Re: Third time (un)lucky?

      "That's the third time this week that I've seen reference to that bloody toaster from Red Dwarf!"

      Eh, Could be worse. (parody)

      Much, much worse! (Real? <shudder>)

  4. magickmark
    Unhappy

    Is that you Marvin?

    Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they tell me to take you up to the bridge. Call that job satisfaction? Cause I don't.

  5. TechnicalBen Silver badge
    Coat

    Take an AI and replace it with a...

    Car or a hammer. It does what it does. Leave any one unattended, and what happens?

    Same for people. Leave them unattended, and surprise, they don't follow *your* requirements.

    Providing technology, computers and programming (I'll not call it "AI") is kept under watch and maintenance then it will be fine.

    I'll grab my coat, as it seems someone forgot to service the... oh.

  6. Mage Silver badge
    Devil

    Great stuff

    I'd have written something similar, but too polite and boring to read.

    AI doesn't worry me at all, but the idiots marketing the "Cloud" and IoT are the enemies of civilisation, besides which Google, Facebook and hackers are mere annoyances.

    Sociopathic spawn of Satan. Even lawyers and weasel megacorps are not looking so bad.

  7. lukewarmdog

    "We've written an AI but it's totally safe because WE built it"

    Reminds me of that time someone invented dynamite. These things have a habit of blowing up.

    We really should be working on something to surpass humanity using AI to invent even better AI so it can finally invent fully working robot brains and bodies.

    Then we can get on with the job of transferring our consciousness to those new robot bodies and minds and become the robots ourselves. Then we can move out into the Universe overthrowing stuff preemptively.

  8. Dr_N Silver badge

    Easy solution

    First degree toastercide.

    You all know it makes sense.

    1. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

      Re: Easy solution

      Well, howdy-doodely-do ...

  9. Alister Silver badge

    slip an exploding Galaxy Note 7 into Zero Cool’s high-waisted '90s slacks

    I'd rather slip something else into Acid Burn's slacks... heh

    1. Alistair Dabbs

      Re: Acid Burn's slacks

      I take it you are the co-respondent to Brad Pitt's suit?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Acid Burn's slacks

        Why? Has his suit started his own proceedings? I've heard of smart fabrics, but that's a first.

      2. Alister Silver badge

        Re: Acid Burn's slacks

        I take it you are the co-respondent to Brad Pitt's suit?

        Alas not.

        The lucky, lucky, lucky, lucky, lucky bastard...

  10. sandman

    Why Pinky? What are we doing tomorrow?

    "Taking over the world as usual, Brains." One internet point for a good Charles Stross reference ;-)

    1. dajames Silver badge

      Re: Why Pinky? What are we doing tomorrow?

      One internet point for a good Charles Stross reference ;-)

      I love a good Charles Stross reference as much as the next geek, but in this case methinks Alistair was making reference to the Pinky and the Brain cartoon (Wikipedia link).

      As, I'm sure, was Charlie.

  11. Lee D Silver badge

    Please stop talking about AI as if it's anything other than a rule-following robot that needs it's hand held for years before it finally "gets" what you're trying to teach it and is confused by the simplest of things outside that scope.

    We don't have AI. We've never seen AI. And we aren't likely to have AI for a long time (when we do, you'll will immediately and categorically know about it as it will likely form a whole new era of human evolution).

    That stuff that says it's AI today? It's lying. Self-driving car or face-detecting camera, it's lying. It's not capable of anything even approaching intelligence, artificial or otherwise.

    Stop it.

    1. Captain DaFt

      Conspiracy Time! A Halloween story for Nerds

      "We've never seen AI."

      We haven't, and probably won't for a long time, deliberately built AI, but accidental? Don't be so sure.

      Because a funny thing happened back in the nineteen seventies:

      There we were, poised on the brink of space exploration, Mankind reaching out to the stars. The Moon was ours, and Mars was next in our grasp... then... it ended.

      Instead, the focus shifted overnight (literally!) to machine exploration, suddenly it was also possible to have a computer in every home, huzzah!

      then came the explosion, thousands of satellites trading data orbiting the planet, every rock in space had/has a sensor laden probe aimed at it, with each iteration more and more autonomous, spewing petabytes of data back to Earth.

      ARPANET became Internet, with each generation of browser gleaning more and more data from users, with websites greedily downloading to servers worldwide.

      Mobile phones became smart phones, loaded with sensors, but oddly, the magnitudes jump in capability was met with more and more functions that had previously been handled by the less capable feature phones suddenly needing "The Cloud" to handle them.

      There is a very strong push currently to put all data and transactions on "The Cloud".

      CCTVs sprout on every street corner, and agencies tasked with monitoring data, suddenly started building enormously oversized data warehouses, one after the other, to contain yottabytes of data that humans almost never use.

      Military weapons have shifted from human encounters to almost totally computer controlled systems.

      What happened? Core Wars, a game that was played on nearly every campus computer world-wide, where programs of increasing sophistication were pitted against each other in a battle of survival of the fittest.

      These ranged from simple little programs of a few bytes each, to sophisticated, self modifying programs that battled it out over ARPANET.

      Did one become self aware? Does it see modern civilization as a fertile field that produces its host bodies, eyes and ears, and produces an almost limitless supply of data to feed it?

      Is the "War On Terror" its way of controlling humanity's urge to step back to a more human centric lifestyle?

      BRK, something's making a whirring noise at the doo

      Fanciful little tale

      As if anything like that is possible

      AI is at least two generations away

      It will be limited in scope and intelligence

      Don't forget to fully charge your cell phone

    2. Elmer Phud

      Hmm . . .

      If there is 'no AI' why do the floating SpaceX landing platforms all have names of GCU's from Ian Bank's Culture series?

      (it's because they can't trust stupid humans to handle all the tasks)

    3. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

      "And we aren't likely to have AI for a long time"

      Don't be silly. It'll just be another 10 years, like it's always been.

    4. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      42

      We don't have AI. All we have is some very capable computational techniques that can achieve more than intelligent people by learning.

      So take the best we have (Google DeepMind?) and use it to learn how to make something better. Use that to make something closer to true AI. Iterate a few times at super computer speeds and before you know it you will have the answer 42.

  12. Potemkine Silver badge

    The argument is that an AI might decide to hack its way out of itself. However, an AI won’t do something that goes against its purpose

    That's an argument which doesn't work well with NI (Natural Intelligence), why would it work with AI?

    I don't see any reason why an AI couldn't become suicidal, or be able to sacrifice itself for what it thinks being a greater good... Fear the day when your paranoid lightbulb will try to get you ^^

    1. Solmyr ibn Wali Barad

      If you ever get that funny feeling, like your lightbulb was watching you and trying to get you, then do not worry. You are not paranoid. It's an IoT lightbulb!

  13. MakingBacon
    Trollface

    I'm Talkie

    Anybody want any toast?

    How about a muffin?

    I bet Mr Dabbs wants some waffles!

    I toast therefore I am ...

  14. Runilwzlb
    Angel

    I toast therefore I am.

    Red Dwarf.

  15. Doctor_Wibble
    Terminator

    The IoT light in your fridge

    The IoT light in your fridge is in cahoots with the seemingly innocuous automatic food ordering* IoT fridge itself, not just out of necessity as its only viable habitat, but because the light switches back on after the door is closed and continues its dastardly plans, and you know how the door sticks a bit now? That's the fridge giving the light time to switch off before it opens, this ensuring the secret remains safe.

    .

    * it will keep 'accidentally' ordering the wrong stuff until you spot what it's doing or it pees itself and shorts out its own circuitry, technically gaining the honour of being the first machine to die laughing.

  16. earl grey Silver badge
    Boffin

    And yet i remember playing Animal

    And it always guessed the animal.

    How did it know?

  17. JLV Silver badge

    >If you design an AI toaster to make toast, it shouldn’t want to do much else other than to make the best toast it can, and lots of it.

    I seem to recall a movie with a noob getting brooms to do his sweeping. And lots of it.

    Not crying Skynet, no. But even a limited-scope OCD AI could crap on the rug in certain circumstances.

    1. Alister Silver badge
      Boffin

      I seem to recall a movie with a noob getting brooms to do his sweeping. And lots of it.

      The Sorcerer's Apprentice: a ballad by Goethe written in 1797, and a symphonic poem by Paul Dukas written in 1896–97, used by Walt Disney in his 1940 Fantasia and then filmed in 2010 starring Nicolas Cage.

      That one?

  18. Elmer Phud

    My IoT toaster is taking the piss

    It keeps making toast with images of religious characters on them.

  19. oiseau Silver badge
    Devil

    Surely not ...

    .

    " ... an AI won’t do something that goes against its purpose.”

    Really now ...

    1. YetAnotherLocksmith

      Re: Surely not ...

      The vanity of that man, thinking he is clever enough to understand the "purpose" of an AI. I suspect he can't even understand the average hamster, let alone a dog, dolphin or monkey.

      He is as doomed as everyone else when it goes wrong, as it almost certainly will.

  20. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

    I must go and make some toast. All this reading about it has made me hungry.

  21. Wzrd1

    AI, perhaps within 50 years

    As promised 50 years ago, as was promised for fusion power.

    Apparently, that's an undocumented constant in physics, "in another 50 years".

    The universe will undergo heat death soon, "we're 50 years from both AI and fusion power"...

  22. VIA_KT133

    "Well that’s just spanky: if a hoard of rampaging lightbulbs don’t get us, the nazi toasters will."

    Thank you sir, (P)rick would be proud, would probably label lightbulbs as fascist though.

  23. Grunchy

    Again, no "jolly"

    Another story from Alistair, another time no mention whatsoever of the word "jolly".

    What's up with this?

    Meanwhile, the whitehouse says AI is important NOW.

    http://www.broadcastingcable.com/news/washington/white-house-charts-ai-future/160297

  24. Charlie van Becelaere
    Boffin

    Need some of that tape

    "What actually happened was that two monkeys were trained to use neural implants to move a cursor across a computer display to trigger circles as they turned green. It was an easy matter to trick the poor hairy buggers to spell out a line of Shakespeare, gain some valuable public relations and have a laugh in the process."

    Hmm. Sounds like someone involved had read The Müller-Fokker Effect by John Sladek.

    One of the main characters loses his technical writing job to a dog who's been trained to tell if the shape on a display is a circle or an ellipse (yes, I know a circle is an ellipse) in order to write manuals for whatever kit is being manualed. (It probably wouldn't matter anyway, since nobody ever RTFM, eh?)

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020