back to article Champagne weekend for Blue Origin with third launch

Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin has released video of its third successful flight on April 2. Alongside Elon Musk's SpaceX, Blue Origin is one of the drivers behind more reusable rockets, and the Saturday test didn't disappoint: its New Shepherd rocket launched and made a successful vertical landing near Van Horn in Texas. Previous …

  1. cbars

    Yay!

    Humans!

  2. Ru'

    I know it's been said before, but it so needs to be painted pink...

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Happy

      You've probably not looked that closely, but other colours are available.

    2. Efros

      With purple crew capsule?

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      It sure looks more like one....

      than that "remote control" from last week especially if painted pink.

      Honestly, it seems like the writers here have lost their sense of humor. Too many opportunities for amusement have been missed.

      1. weegie38

        Re: It sure looks more like one....

        Oh, OK, I'll start.

        Radar Operator: Colonel, you better have a look at this radar.

        Colonel: What is it, son?

        Radar Operator: I don't know, sir, but it looks like a giant...

  3. imanidiot Silver badge

    I can just about imagine Bezos saying: Suck it Musk..

    Though I still think its mostly comparing apples to oranges between Blue origin and a SpaceX D9 1st stage.

  4. x 7

    Its the "Flying Dildo" (TM)

    I bet it vibrates like hell on launch. Probably comes back with a bit of a bang as well

    1. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

      "Its the "Flying Dildo" (TM)"

      Yes. Yes it is. Which leads to the question: "What does Bezos know that we don't know?"

      1. Francis Boyle Silver badge

        That there's a market opening for an all live action* remake of Flesh Gordon.

        *I mean no crappy cgi, of course.

    2. Ugotta B. Kiddingme Silver badge

      Re: "It's the 'Flying Dildo' (TM)"

      Yes. It seems Blue Origin were originally going with a more conventional design until they got wind of the something heading our way from deep space. This led redesign efforts to the current shape in an effort to appease our new Giant Space Vagina overlady(bits).

      1. x 7

        Re: "It's the 'Flying Dildo' (TM)"

        well I guess the shape makes for a pretty tight and secure docking station

    3. I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
      Happy

      "My commanding officer swore blind that the whole planet was about to be eaten by a giant mutant star goat."

      Perhaps rather than building 3 Arks, Bezos is attempting to placate it...

  5. John Robson Silver badge

    Toy rocket....

    This is a pure toy - there is nothing wrong with that, but any attempt Bezos makes to compare this with the Falcon is like comparing one of those kiddie electric ride on cars with a supertanker...

    1. Jon 37

      Re: Toy rocket....

      True, the rocket they have now is a toy.

      But they're learning lots of stuff that can be applied to non-toy rockets. E.g. they built their own engine, they have the whole landing system, space life support systems, stage separation system, and they have rocket assembly experience.

      SpaceX started out with small non-reusable rockets and grew into bigger rockets and later reusable ones, as they got more experience, and they're planning on going for manned launches soon. Blue Origin are a bit behind and are going the other route, they're starting out with a small reusable rocket and they'll make it manned next, then they'll make it bigger as they get more experience.

      SpaceX partly funded its growth with small cargo missions; Blue Origin is going to try to partly fund itself with suborbital passenger joyrides.

      Both companies should eventually get to reusable manned orbital rockets & reusable heavy cargo rockets.

      (Note for pedants: By "manned" I mean "actually flown with people on board". Both SpaceX and Blue Origin have designed their rockets to be manned, but neither has actually flown humans yet).

      1. Voland's right hand Silver badge

        Re: Toy rocket....

        Not necessarily, Bezos and Musk have very different monetization strategies.

        Musk is simple - "the whole package - take it or leave it". It is very conventional - this is how most companies build product.

        Bezos so far has managed to sell each of his services as a retail "e2e version" and as "wholesale" - AWS, etc all started as backends for his retail shop. He is already going down that route with Blue Origin. The engine and its higher capacity version are already sold to United Launch Alliance. I would not be surprised if all components are similarly available separately at the end. Building something "the Bezos way" is more difficult, it takes longer, but it is ultimately a massively hedged strategy - he will make money even if he does not succeed in building an orbital launcher of his own.

    2. phuzz Silver badge
      Flame

      Re: Toy rocket....

      SpaceX have rockets that can put useful payloads into orbit, and they can (sometimes) land them, but they're yet to actually re-use a piece of hardware.

      Blue Origin have rockets that can only just reach space, but they've cracked the landing and re-use part of the problem.

      Both firms are working towards the same problem from different directions, and while they're in competition, I'd be surprised if they didn't feel more kinship with each other, rather than competition with the "old guard" who've had a monopoly on selling rockets in the US for years.

      We still need a Rocket! icon methinks elReg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

      1. John Robson Silver badge

        Re: Toy rocket....

        Well...

        Yes I know that Bezos is building towards bigger rockets, and these are already serious bits of kit. But the grasshopper was doing all of this several years ago - it was just using a lower peak altitude because it wasn't targeting tourism, but was a pure technology demonstrator.

        There was a great infographic posted a few months back - pointing out that the Falcon 9 first stage could put a fully fuelled and loaded Blue Origins NS into orbit...

        That's a colossal difference in capability!

        1. MachDiamond Silver badge

          Re: Toy rocket....

          Masten Space Systems, Armadillo Aerospace, Unreasonable Rocket and a handful of other start ups were landing rockets accurately long before SpaceX. None of them went to "space", but the really hard part is the controlled landing. The rest of it mostly takes much larger fuel tanks.

          Look up "Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge" for more information.

          The DC-X was the first US government real go at a vertical landing rocket.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Toy rocket....

        "Blue Origin have rockets that can only just reach space, but they've cracked the landing and re-use part of the problem."

        Blue Origin has "cracked" only the problem of reusing a small, sub-orbital, single-stage rocket. They are very far from cracking the much bigger problems that SpaceX is solving now.

  6. peterkin

    Dr Flexi Jerkov called. he'd like his rocket back.

    1. Francis Boyle Silver badge

      Dammit. Beat me to the Flesh Gordon reference. Have an upvote.

  7. x 7

    so will the first passengers on the flying dildo be 'merkins?

  8. BernardL

    well done

    I was a bit worried about that deceleration though, seems pretty sudden on the video. I wonder how many Gs that works out to.

    1. imanidiot Silver badge
      Flame

      Re: well done

      Quite a lot. Doesn't really matter though as it's just machinery at that point. The capsule detaches before apogee and lands under its own chutes.

      --> And lots of it!

    2. Tempest8008

      Re: well done

      I don't think the rocket really cares that much.

      Remember, that's the unmanned portion.

  9. John Brown (no body) Silver badge

    Just showed the video to my wife

    She's not really interested in this stuff and has never seen a Blue Origins launch.

    Her comment? "Christ, it looks like a huge dildo!"

    So, based on my non-technical, uninterested in space wife, I find it hard to believe the design engineers weren't giggling behind their hands while justifying the shape "for good engineering reasons"

  10. fpx
    Pint

    Small step for mankind, none for me

    Well done, Jeff.

    I still won't be able to afford a trip.

    For a trip to "space" on my income, my hopes are on balloon rides, which I think have a better likelihood to become affordable enough in my lifetime. I wouldn't get the acceleration of a rocket launch (I can get them in a rollercoaster) or the weightlessness (could get that in a vomit comet if I cared), but on the plus side I'd get to see space for an hour or two instead of just five minutes.

    Riding a dragon capsule to a Bigelow space motel? I need a few lottery wins first.

  11. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Company name change required

    Should be called Electric Blue Origin.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019