And who gets the $$$ from this??
When you do a nice download of a cutesy song, and pay (for example) $1.00 for it, the majority of it goes to the download service and very little (less than $.10) goes to the producer or the artist, who probably contributed the majority of the effort in making it come to fruition. Admittedly for the artists/songwriters it wasn't much better with physical media, but the ones that flog the content (the producers) did get a bunch of money for all their effort (and it was a bunch!).
I just don't know if this is a sustainable model, but we all try.
Yes, the tunes storehouses should get some $$$ for hosting and delivering the content, but near 90% is a bit much!