back to article ICANN taking over the 'net from Uncle Sam? Ted Cruz to the rescue!

Four leading Congressional figures, including US presidential candidate Ted Cruz, have questioned whether the Obama Administration has the legal right to transfer control of the internet's key technical functions outside the US government. In a letter [PDF] to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), chair of the Senate …

  1. elDog

    I humbly suggest that any puffed shirt have the credentials to question proposals

    While Teddie Cruse and other US politicians have millions to spend on their minions and lots of help from government-funded private interests to advise, I would like the representatives to actually have a real knowledge of the issues that they spout.

    Back in the old days of the US of A, reps were actually working people. They ran farms, businesses, possibly enslaved some workers. But they knew what made the world really go around, back in those days.

    Nowadays, most of the pontificators (mea culpa, monseigneur) are paid sycophants for vested interests. They have no knowledge of the real world.

    Yes, they can cite many industry/interest studies to support their demented POV, but they would be totally helpless in a true debate on the merits of ANY issue.

  2. Someone Else Silver badge

    The backstory

    But 15 years later, the Cruz letter notes: "We understand that to perform this work, GAO will need to conduct both significant audit work and complex legal analysis."

    But, later, when Cruz was informed that serious money would be required to do the complex legal analysis, he angrily retorted, "The United States Gub'mint will not spend one taxpayer dime to support the lavish lifestyles of a bunch of Gub'mint lawyers!" And so, as is so often the case in Washington these days, nothing was done, and ICANN went on to ruin run the Internet.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Facepalm

    What would happen if

    All of the non-US-based root zone maintainers simply stopped referring anything to the US-based root zones? Is it possible that we would end up with one root zone per country?

    1. SImon Hobson Bronze badge

      Re: What would happen if

      I was musing along similar lines just yesterday - what if everyone took their toys home and left ICANN to play with themselves (make of that last bit what you will ;-) ) ?

      The answer of course is that "no-one will" - for the very reasons outlined in another article just last week.

      If any small group wanted to break away, then in practical terms they'd be well and truly stuffed as they'd then be in their own little bit of isolated internet - their users would not be able to access the majority of the internet, and whoever stuck their neck out and tried it would find that their users would very quickly cut it off.

      Only if you got enough people together - and in particular, all the registries involved - then you could possibly try a break away and "take the internet with you". But again, speaking practically - unless the "new root" and the "ICANN root" are the same, then there would be mass confusion which would be bad for everyone.

      A breakaway group could declare it's new root as "THE" root - but until all DNS operators worldwide update their hints files then the "old root" would still be active. Get millions of admins worldwide to agree on changing their root hints ? Good game, good game !

      You might possibly get by with just taking "most" of the root servers with you - then you could update the records they publish to exclude the ones still controlled by ICANN. But that's still a bit hit and miss and DNS servers around the world would then suffer "indeterminate" data depending on which root server they happened to query when updating. Registries would need to ensure that they kept the records up to date at both the new and ICANN roots - lest the TLDs they operate should become "flaky" (only resolvable if the DNS server doing the resolution has the "right" root server list).

      So while it would seem an attractive thought - just tell ICANN where to stuff it's root - in practical terms it just can't happen.

      1. Yes Me Silver badge
        Paris Hilton

        Re: What would happen if

        "If any small group wanted to break away, then in practical terms they'd be well and truly stuffed"

        True enough. But that's not what would happen. What would happen is that all the root zone operators outside the US would get together and do it together. Then you'd soon end up with a roughly even split between half the resolvers in the world using the US-controlled root servers and the rest using the non-US ones. Not saying that would be a Good Thing though... imagine a world with two parishilton.com's...

  4. Mark 85

    Bang!

    I think I heard ICANN shooting itself in the foot this past weekend... I suspect a lawsuit will be following or perhaps some Congressional sub-committee will suddenly change some "agreements and rules" to hold the status quo for a year or so.

  5. bozoid

    I was on the fence about the whole ICANN/IANA transition -- everything seemed to be working, so why change it?

    But now that Ted Cruz and his xenophobic knuckle-dragging mouth-breathing buddies have come out against the transition, I'm for it.

  6. Just An Engineer

    Lack of Intelligence

    How can you tell it was written by the Staff of one of these fools? Someone actually knew what the root zone file was and how it was spelled. You knew these 4 ID10Ts didn't.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like