If only Orange would notice....
Still give a paltry 750MB to me, I use that taking a dump.
Mobile customers now consume double the amount of data than they did last year, says Three. The operator's contract customers now use an average of 1.1GB a month, compared to the 450MB they gobbled up this time last year. The culprits of high data use are unsurprisingly top-end smartphone users, who swallow roughly 1.5GB a …
3.26 right now on my 3 phone tethered vs 2.7 on my Sky BB. In Edinburgh city center its closer to 6 via my phone. And unless BDUK gets their finger out I live in an economically unviable area for BT to roll out FTTC. Even thought I am, by the road, less than 500m from the nearest FTTC cabinet and inside of 4km by road from the exchange.
and we weren't comparing Three to Voda, we were comparing Mobile BB to fixed line BB. :)
if you happen to live in the sticks, that's something you have to accept, or get together with your local community and get Fibre installed if it's that bad. My parents did that and they now have unlimited Fibre to the HOUSE, yes to the HOUSE.
Check out Rutland Telecom :)
I agree 100%
I recently had the joys of moving from a fibre optic connection to a property with an ADSL connection. I was told we could expect a theoretical maximum speed of 8meg which I knew it would be nowhere near having previously worked for a big ADSL provider. Sure enough the connection is steady at about 4meg.
Speedtest when going through Three Network 3G? 9 meg constant download
On my old Hero I used around 250Mb a month, mostly because the device was too slow to hit anything hard.
Now I have a Galaxy S3 and use around 500Mb a week, purely because everything works well.
Now if only Three would admit that the still need the 2g piggyback in some places, I could get data in the office and try and break 1Gb a week :)
Why are we taking the figures with a pinch of salt, just because people use more because they have no constraints? Thats ridiculous. People are using more because there are no constraints, yes. But unless you've got something that suggests people are actively selecting not to switch to Wifi when they get home, i dont see how this stands up.
Thats like Vauxhall doing a 1 years free petrol offer and you saying you will ignore the higher mileage on vauxhall cars compared to ford or renault because of this. "Ah yes, they've done 120% more miles on average than the same type of car sold a year ago, but thats just because of the free petrol you see, so it doesnt matter".
I never thought about calling 3 straight up to ask them to unblock my porn... I just set up a squid proxy on my OVH RPS instead and encrypted my connection :) And I did that only when their porn blocker blocked a non-porn site (unless anything NSFW is porn... now is it?) It's phillyd.tv in case you're wondering.
I always switch to wi-fi at home or the office even though I never come near my data cap (2 gig sim only on 3)
Partly this is habit. Mainly though I hate having to put in a PIN all the time to unlock the phone (required with ICS if you have credentials on the phone) and Unlock with Wifi removed the need when you are hooked up to your selected stations.
I don't agree with the petrol analogy though. If Vauxhaul offered unlimited tank refills then people would tend to drive further than if they had to start forking out for their own petrol after the first tank each month. It goes without saying.
If 3 were not as cheap on their buffet deals then their overall usage may not have increased as much.
How can companies still have plans with 500MB of data ?! The standard offering should be 1GB and we should be able to tether that. It's our data that we've paid for who are they to decide what we use it for !.
Well done Three for not differentiating between mobile use and tethered use.
UK mobile providers need to wake up to the fact that people want data on the move, and we want lots of it and we want it fast. O2 discovered this when they got the iPhone exclusive and ended up doing lots of remedial work upgrading data pipes and installing new cells. All the other providers are now starting to suffer the same slow data.
I've used data on the move during a journey for the last 12 months, and three was consistantly better than Vodafone at keeping a signal and providing me with faster data. If only they would have sold me one of their homesignal boxes so I could have a good service at home I'd still be with them...
At the risk of sounding like a Three ambassador (Which I'm really not), getting their One Plan which allows tethering was the best purchase I've made in a while. I do a lot of travelling around the UK, and therefore find myself sitting around waiting a lot and also in hotels. I rarely bother with hotel Wi-Fi now, and watching iPlayer on the train is just awesome!
I'm in Ireland and don't have dsl/wifi/satellite/etc, my Three ready-to-go is my only web access. I top up by 20 euros in one go a month and get unlimited web for that along with whatever calls and txts, which frankly I don't care about as I barely use voice any more. So far this month I must be up to well over 20 gigs downloaded, all from my mobile. They were fecking terrible several years back but have vastly improved since. Any other providers that I know of here are utterly pathetic in comparison.
Right now I'm not a broadband customer at all (not wired, not 3G). Well... not in this country. I don't need it. But when I will, I won't be getting any wired services unless they drop the line rental requirement. I'll just get on Three's One Plan. I'm already a Three 3Pay customer, and love them (the 150 MB free allowance does me for now). I don't need a landline either. If I were to go with a copper chain, I still wouldn't need a landline. I don't need TV either. I'm basically the worst customer in the books of BT and Sky. But I get punished for that, as I still need to pay line rental. Virgin, if you go on their fiber rather than the BT reselling side of the business, charge you extra for the "privilege" of taking just broadband from them (with a 13.9/month phone line, broadband is 14.5/month; don't want a phone? it's 22.5/month for you mister).
I declare myself a Three fanboi, and I don't see myself switching at the rate the competition is going.
You do realise that 3 did a deal with T-mobile (now EverythingEverywhere) for access to their 3G network some years ago before the boom in data volumes. Apparently that contract did not define data volumes, hence 3 can push unlimited data at no real cost to themselves. Great business model for 3 and their customers, but a very poor decision for whoever in T-mobile signed that contract...
In fact, that's probably why EverythingEverywhere is in such a rush to roll out LTE. They can try and reduce their exposure to unlimited 3G 3 customers , whilst tempting paying customers from the other operators onto LTE.
Anonymous for obvious reasons...
I moved from O2 to 3 6 months ago, and would never go back;
using iPhone and tethered tablet for TVCatchup and streaming downloaded TV shows from my home PC via AirVideo.
I easily use 5-6GB a month, and get a great speed too, 4-MB down, 1-MB up.
I will sometimes stick with 3G even in places where there is free WIFI, usually because my 3G is faster.
I just wish I could get my iPhone to automatically switch between WIFI and 3g depending on which was currently faster as oppose to having to turn off WIFI manually when it gets a bit laggy.
when i was with O2 on their "unlimited" plan, i got my data cut off at 1GB 2 weeks into the month because of their "fair-usage" policy.
I recommend 3 to everyone now;
Recently upgraded from my HTC Desire to the Samsung S3.
Saw the article somewhere about that Zombie game now being free (Dead .. something?), so thought I would take a look....
118 MB download!! Don't get me wrong, gimme the pretty graphics and functionality. Gimme gimme gimme!
But... that would have been the entire phone memory of my HTC Desire (ish). And I pity the fools who've downloaded the BBC Olympics app for their phones... I hope they're all with 3.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019