back to article Chinese fossil analysis suggests new hominid species

Details on what could be a new species of human based in East Asia have been discovered by archeologists, and could alter our understanding of the spread of humanity across the planet. Scientists have published an open paper detailing the analysis of the remains of three individuals discovered at the Maludong (or Red Deer Cave …


This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Martin Budden Bronze badge


    Top-left fossil in the photo. The story does tell us that he lived a long time ago, now we know how long. But how did he get here from a galaxy far away?

    1. perlcat

      Re: DARTH VADER!!!

      Worst case of helmet-head I've ever seen in my life!

  2. Miguel Farah

    So, just how many more "Homo Sapiens *" have there been?

    Besides us, we have Neanderthals, Floresiensis, Denisovans and now these guys. How many more "failed competitors" were there up until recent times? How many more are waiting to be found? And how much interbreeding was there (we already know about HSS interbreeding with Neanderthals and Denisovans)?

    Could the Americas have been populated *initially* by some other species, only to be displaced by a later wave of Homo Sapiens?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: So, just how many more "Homo Sapiens *" have there been?

      Everyone wants a new species to keep the grant-money coming.

      I reckon that if we dug up an English longbowman, scientists would take one look at the deformities and announce a new species. Thin data needs to be treated *very* cautiously.

      1. Mistered

        Re: So, just how many more "Homo Sapiens *" have there been?

        I have to wonder whether the idea of the 'deformed' skeletons of longbow men is a bit of a myth. it's repeated a lot, but almost never with any sources, apart from a hazy memory of one skeleton from the Mary Rose, and one study of skeletons from Towton, which so far as i can see simply says the bones of one arm were thicker, which is a 'deformation', but not the quasimodo like image the word tends to conjure up.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      "only to be displaced by a later wave of Homo Sapiens?"

      ...or maybe not?

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward


    Clearly a Chinese copy that didn't work as well as the real thing!

  4. stu 4


    Does it annoy anyone else that they keep making such a big thing about this stuff ?

    1. if 'we'/Neanderthal/hobbits/deer people interbred then we are not really a species are we (at least not by Dicky Dawkins main criteria).

    2. If above is accepted, then we are amalgam of all the different types - just like different types of cows.

    1. Mephistro Silver badge

      Typo? (Re: species)

      That should read:

      "1. if 'we'/Neanderthal/hobbits/deer people interbred then we are really a single species, aren't we?"

      At least according to Population Genetics. IMHO he traditional definitions 'species' are usually too vague to be useful in most contexts.

  5. Richard Wharram


    I wonder how big their tits were.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Hmm

      Small. Which explains why they did not propagate successfully. Small tits in modern women is obviously a throwback.

      Ps. I have not yet been able to fathom the fascination for large tits. Maybe I have a couple extra genes from the red deer people?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Hmm

        Not so much the fascination with large tits - it's the fascination with tits period.

        How many other mammals on this planet are there where the females sport developed mammaries when not caring for young?

        (on the subject of fairness on this topic, we need pics please El Reg!)

        1. Bumpy Cat

          Re: Hmm

          It's a display mechanism, like feathers on a peacock, big bottoms on a baboon, and muscles on the human male. In fact, I recall reading somewhere that human mammaries developed like they did to resemble buttocks.

          Not very scientific in motivation, but .... hooray for evolution!

          1. moonface

            I recall reading somewhere

            It was probably in the Naked Ape by Desmond Morris. It was a great book.

            Anyway, not sure about this being an unknown species, there are plenty of chinless wonders aping around today.

          2. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            "to resemble buttocks"

            ...but only during very specific fashions for female foundation garments...

            (think e.g. Hollywood ca. the 50s)

  6. Torben Mogensen


    There have been a lot of controversy over whether Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals could (and did) interbreed or not. The opinions range from "not possible" over "sterile offspring (like mules)" to "Some European human characteristics are inherited from interbreeding with Neanderthals".

    Which is true I can't say. I'm inclined towards the "sterile offspring" theory, since AFAIK genetic analysis of Sapiens and Neanderthal DNA have not shown any difference in European, African and Asian DNA that could be explained by genetic material inherited from Neanderthals.

    But it is equally obvious that speciation is a gradual process, so there will in the past have been differently-looking hominids that could interbreed so hybrids appeared. It is only when groups have been isoated long enough that interbreeding stops being possible. There are theories that state that early Sapiens at some point got nearly extinct, which reduced the gene pool sufficiently to prevent viable interbreeding with other hominids and that all present humans are descendants of this small group (which may have numbered only a few hundred individuals).

    How this affects the possibility of the skeletons in question being a separate species or not, I can't say.

    1. This post has been deleted by its author

  7. Elbereth

    Cool Article

    Could they be linked with the hominids from New-Guinea?

  8. JDC

    Very appreciable chin

    Get the feeling El Reg is reusing its pictures, as that top "artist's impression" is definitely no chinless wonder!

  9. Some Beggar

    "including the frontal skull lobes found in modern humans but lacking an appreciable chin"

    Homo Windsorus

  10. Citizen Kaned

    as said above...

    3 samples do not make a real theory. imagine a bit of interbreeding now with 2 people with no chins (lots of regular humans are chinless wonders) - they would produce chinless wonders... but a new species they are not. how much variation is there in current human skeletons? loads... What about deformities? maybe they were all brothers & sisters?

    1. Anonymous John


      Which is why they are looking for DNA, which if found, should tell us more.

  11. Karl H

    this sh*t the life out of me

    I thought I was looking in a mirror !

This topic is closed for new posts.

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019