back to article Apple MacBook Pro 13in Core i5 laptop

Guilty, your honour. In mitigation, I would like to assure the jury that I do not automatically adore everything with Apple branding on it, nor have I any intention of jacking off over a Steve Jobs biography. I just happen to like the current range of Apple MacBook Pro notebook computers, that’s all. Is it such a crime? Apple …


This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. DF118

    Looks quite chunky

    Entry level ... £999 ... Bwahahahaaa!

    1. gregkelly1985

      Exactly, far too expensive

      I mean basically dropping a k on what he finished by saying it's one of the best computers he's used. He's qualified it with "entry level" but it's still not very damning!

      Also he's referenced how he HAS to give it a negative review or risk being flamed (flame on Garth, flame on Wayne)! How dare he point out this most obvious of truths, heresy I say! Burn the witch!

      1. DF118

        Oops, you seem to have confused me with someone who didn't tune out from the review after two lines and come straight to the comments page to hide under the first likely-looking bridge.

        1. gregkelly1985

          Double Fail?

          You said: "confused me with someone who didn't tune out" - so therefore you did tune out and I collared you on being a troll. Double negative = double fail or face palm!

          1. DF118

            Um, thanks for the laugh there, but I did actually say exactly what I meant. If you think about it for a minute or six.

            1. gregkelly1985

              Well if you said exactly what you meant then I didn't confuse you at all in my earlier post. I was hoping that I had but unfortunately not. Both my posts still stand on the fact I collared you for trolling with the first and then explained my reasons on the next which you then confirmed was correct. Cheers :-)

              1. DF118

                You're right you didn't confuse me, but you do sound a little confused yourself. Either that or I was off that day in troll school where they taught us that an earnestly sarcastic reply was the same as being "called out".

                What gave me away? Was it the troll icon? Shucks, hope I have better luck next time.

                1. gregkelly1985


                  So let me get this straight, I furthered your trolling post with an earnestly sarcastic (as you so eloquently put it) troll post and then you say I've confused you - referring back to your fist reply:

                  "Oops, you seem to have confused me with someone who didn't tune out blah blah blah."

                  Now you say I didn't confuse you (by that it means I was not confused by what you were doing) - see "You're right you didn't confuse me blah blah blah", but that I am confused?

                  Jeebus save me.....

                  1. DF118

                    I think you may be confusing the 'confusion' sense of the word 'confused' with the 'mistaken' sense. Easy mistake to make.

                    1. gregkelly1985
  2. Arctic fox

    It is indeed a very fine looking piece of kit but.....................

    ........................" I can forgive the shared-memory graphics and the lack of USB ports, perhaps also the fairly average processor performance..................."

    At £1000, no I most certainly could not. At that price I expect the full works with regard to connectivity and storage and nothing but the full works - end of. All the styling and the build quality in the world is let down by those kinds of omissions. That, IMHO makes it about 15 - 20% overpriced. Without getting into a discussion of the os the most I would pay for that machine would be £850 - max.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    That small screen.

    The problem is that the 11 inch Air has a 1366x768 screen and the 13 inch air has a 1440x900 screen but the 13" MBP has 1280x800 and that's the reason I didn't buy one.

    Yours faithfully,

    an aspiring but disappointed fanbois

    1. Craigness


      Fanbois is the plural of fanboi, though both are pronounced the same: "fan-bwah", from the French.

    2. Michael Jennings

      The 13 inch Pro is lagging at this point.

      Looking at the low end models, the Macbook Air has a slower CPU (1.6GHz against 2.4GHz), but the same graphics, a better screen, an SSD rather than a HDD, and is much thinner and lighter. The Pro has an optical drive, and a tad more expandability - ie you can upgrade the RAM and the hard drive. That SSD is going to actually make the Air a better performer for a lot of tasks. Unless you need the optical drive or more storage when you are on the move, I can't really see the point of getting the Pro. If you are going to do complex graphical or computational "Pro" tasks, the 13 inch Pro just isn't going to cut it: you are going to need one of the 15 or 17 inch models with better CPUs and graphics. You can buy the 13 inch Pro with an SSD rather than an HDD, but that makes it more expensive than the Air.

      Apple needs to turn the 13 inch Macbook Pro into a genuine Pro machine. That means quad core CPUs, a screen at least the equal of the one in the Air, and decent discrete graphics. If the power, heat, and space constraints of the current enclosure do not allow this, it needs a redesign. One option might be to cut out the optical drive to make space. For those rare occasions when you actually need one, an external USB drive does the job fine.

      1. Stacy
        Thumb Down

        You leave my optical drive alone!!!! The only reason I have my MBP 13" from mid this year is that it had an optical dive in it!

    3. uhuznaa

      For me higher pixel densities are just meaningless as long as the UI can't adapt to it. If you're really working with such a thing staring 10 hours a day on microscopic fonts and icons is just a pain and 1280x800 on 13" is much better for your eyes and your sanity. The 11" and 13" Airs are already borderline for me. It's OK for an hour or two, but then it gets just painful.

      1. Stacy
        Thumb Down

        So give me the option. Some people don't want sharp screens, others do. The screen on the 13" MBP isn't bad, but it's awful after using my 11" Vaio that had 1366*768 - if it wasn't for Sony removing the optical drives from their 11" Vaios my broken one (I dropped something on the screen - f**k) would have been replaced with another.

  4. redniels

    looks nice...

    but so does a super model. the super model also has the same problem: I can't (or better won't )afford her.

    just last week I bought an asus laptop (6GB, I5 2430m, 750GB, Gforce 520mx) including an USB 3.0 port.

    for... HALF THE PRICE. HALF. one time again: HALF. did I already say it? Half. the. price.

    I could literally buy 2 K53Sc's for one macbook pro. 2.

    same cpu. more memory. more Hdd space. usb 3. bigger screen. better graphics. 2 hours work time? also check.

    but...No apple logo. is that logo really worth 500 pounds?

    your end conclusion is very, very correct: "it’s so very, very expensive."

    1. Craigness

      Spending £1000 on a computer is soooo 1998

    2. Sean Baggaley 1

      It may be half the price...

      ... but it has a lower resolution display, (so only physically bigger: you'll get *less* actual stuff on it in use); an ancient webcam (seriously: 0.3 mp?!), NO Thunderbolt expansion port—hardly future-proofed, then—and it ain't a unibody case either. (Yes, you really can tell the difference. No creaks. No groans. No flex.)

      Oh: and I've run my MBPro 17" for *six hours* between charging. I understand the 13" models can get about 4-5 or so. (Admittedly, I did upgrade the hard drive to an SSD, which made a massive difference to performance too. But oh, so worth it!)

      Also: it's an Asus. A company not known for its great QA and awesome customer service. I've supported some of their kit in the past, and my sister-in-law's Asus runs hot, whistles like a kettle and gained a dodgy screen hinge after just 16 months of not-particularly-heavy use.

      To cap it all, she was told by Asus' own customer support (after a full *hour* of waiting on the line), that the whistling was "normal" for that model—strange, it wasn't mentioned in the publicity material—and the hinge problem was considered "normal wear and tear" and thus any repair would be chargeable. Classy.

      Their customer support was utter, utter crap. Seriously. They're as bad as Acer and Dell (consumer). And I've dealt with most of them. The only Windows-centric company whose products I'd recommend is HP. (I do feel they f*cked up royally in dropping their WebOS tablet so quickly. The software was great; they just needed another iteration to nail the hardware.) And their customer service has been very good in my experience.

      Say what you like about Apple's air of smugness, but their customer service really is truly excellent. At my age, I value that and am willing to pay a bit extra for it.

      1. A. Lewis

        And half the quality?

        I never wanted to be a mac fanboy, really. As a teenager, I thought macs were terrible: fanciful, oversimple - for idiots. But then as a 'proper grown up', undertaking a fair amount of laptop repair, I came to realise it: macbooks are the best built laptops you can buy. They really are rock solid. Whereas the vast majority of the PC laptops I've ever repaired have been plasticky things full of parts included for their low cost rather than their quality or durability.

        Yes some of the 'apple fee' is partly a premium on a 'trendy' product. But the rest of it is due to the fact that you're getting some top-notch hardware.

        (Written from my macbook - running xubuntu, naturally!) ;-)

    3. Stacy
      Thumb Down

      But what screen?

      And I don't just mean resolution. But pixel density, and general screen quality. I love Asus kit, and in fact from 2000 to this year brought almost nothing but Asus.

      However... I would never dream of buying a 500GBP machine as the quality is just terrible - screen and build quality. No matter the brand! My Asus machines make the Apple look cheap (actually I have the apple for working on the train as it gave me the best screen / optical drive combo for the money - there is a way to annoy the Apple fans I know; tell them you brought a MBP because it was the cheap option!) but they have lasted years and have pin sharp screens with lots of desktop real estate and are wonderful for editing photos.

      My sister in laws cheapo laptop is awful though - you can never see the whole screen in good quality as the viewing angle is so poor that either the top or bottom is washed out and the pixel density and colour reproduction is just a joke.

  5. Fintan

    Looks, build quality, but innards need to be user upgradable

    Ive owned MacBooks and MacbookPros. I love the build quality. I love the look, but two things, both controllable by apple ensure i will not own one of these:

    1. Battery Life with windows. Its half that of this laptop with OSX. And before you start, dont tell me its because windwos is a besat. I can get 8+ hours on my Vostro with both Windows 7 and Server 2008R2. Battery life with windows sucks because apple want it to suck. Im guessing its down to drivers that ensure hardware only runs at full throttle. Its a low blow and anti competitive in my opinion.

    2. Not user upgradable. If i put in an SSD, i void the warranty! so i have to go with the apple SSD, which i know nothing about ( on the apple site it just says "add SSD" or something like that. I need to know the make, model, throughput etc etc to ensure im getting a Good SSD. Also, for their "generic" SSD you pay about 200 bucks more than you would on crucial!

    I like both OSX and windows, but where as I need Windows for work, i only used OSX for fun (Photoshop, garrage band etc). went with what was necessary , Windows.

    For about 150 euros more than this Macbook I ended up with a Vostro 13" (3350) with 8gb RAM, i5 processor, Crucial M4 256 SSD, USB 3.0, HDMI and a battery that allows me to work for 8+ hours on single charge. Its not as pretty but due to the ability to add my own SSD its magnitudes more capable than the Macbook.

    1. Michael Jennings


      >If i put in an SSD, i void the warranty!

      I don't think so, actually. The unibody models have upgradeable hard drives and user upgradeable RAM. I have never heard of a case in which Apple has refused to honor the warranty due to such an upgrade, and I know of many cases in which they have honored it. The earlier non-unibody Macbook Pros did not theoretically have user upgradeable hard drives, but even then Apple would generally still honor the warranty if you had clearly done the upgrade carefully and had not damaged anything when doing it. (Amazingly, Apple replaced a faulty motherboard for free on my non-unibody Macbook Pro despite my having previously replaced the hard drive myself, and despite the computer being out of warranty. I am still awed by this).

      You theoretically do void your warranty if you replace the SSD on a Macbook Air yourself, but that is a price of the extremely thin form factor. It is still possible to do, assuming you can find a suitable SSD using that non-standard modules that go in the Air.

    2. ThomH Silver badge

      Not a very persuasive argument

      "It performs worse with Windows, this is probably a driver issue, therefore Apple did it on purpose because they hate me and have no respect for the marketplace"

      Does the same conspiracy logic apply to every supplier that produces flawed driver software? It's just that the evidence of iTunes and of Apple's direction generally would appear to make it much more likely that they're just not very good at producing code for Windows.

    3. Jamchal
      Thumb Up

      Hi mate,

      I've had my MPB since Oct 09 and took a 3 year warranty on it.

      Since then I've spilled wine on it, bashed it a couple of times and tore it apart piece by piece to replace only the keyboard which is built into the unibody - this actually resulted in me seperating the screen from the laptop itself. I also swapped out the Hard disk and memory.

      However, I recently took it to an apple store due to the battery health deteriorating very quickly, they happily said - no problem, we'll swap it out immediately for you, come back in an hour and a half and we'll have it ready.

      Job done - brand new battery.

      They also resent me a free replacement snow leopard disk because I lost mine.

      Additionally they gave me a brand new ipod touch 4g when the screen started playing up on my own - no questions asked - straight swap at the Gbar.

      Apple service is truely fantastic, I commend their outstanding support and so far they have been very helpfull - I'm glad I pay the apple premium.

  6. Robert E A Harvey


    Just looking at the ones you compared it to:

    Travelmate £678.21

    Sony £1,239.97

    Ethos £999.97

    I don't reckon its a bad price for what you get.

  7. stephendv

    it's not expensive

    The Lenovo X220 is a PC with comparable spec: 2.5Ghz processor, smaller 1366x768 screen, smaller 320Gb disk, and that's for sale with the special web price of £1,022.79. Creaky plastic chasis included free of charge.

    How'd you like them apples.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Only one of you?

      Good of you to register with The Register to share that.

      Astrotuuuuuuurf to the rescue!

    2. Craigness

      Yes it is.

      I got those specs for £320, but without the creaky plastic chassis (if it's so expensive, why did you buy it? Or are you only guessing that the chassis will creak? I'll guess that an aluminium chassis gets unbearably cold in the winter. Would you like to be offered up as a fact?).

      To call something inexpensive you have to show there are no similar products at a cheaper price. All you've done is show that another product is even more expensive.

  8. Citizen Kaned

    since when....

    was a £999 laptop entry level? you can get a gaming spec laptop that is much more powerful for less and a powerful none-gaming for a lot less.

  9. JDX Gold badge


    I find the whole concept of extending the Pro range to 13" versions a bit bizarre, to be honest.

  10. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Mutt's nuts?

    Shiny screens are bollocks, if that is what you meant.

  11. Steve Davies 3 Silver badge

    Ah but for the glossy display

    If it were not for the glossy display then I might consider swapping my 4+yr old 17in MBP for a new Mac.

    Don't get me wrong, it is not only Apple that are shipping all or nearly all of their entire model lines with Glossy screens.

    Frankly, I find the usability of such screens pretty poor.

    Otherwise, I'd be joining you in the Dungeon.

    SAD but not quite a Fail on Apple's part.

  12. Efros


    JHChristmas. An i5 Dell with 6GB RAM and 640GB HDD and W7 HP is about $650. Apple still playing the premium card shit for no reason.

    1. Gordon 10 Silver badge

      No reason - other than the fact plenty of people are still buying them at that price.

      Fair play to Apple - charge what the market will bear.

  13. Thomas 18

    Power comparison

    Why is the benchmark compared to a £399 laptop when this one is £999. If you are comparing 'entry level offerings from various companies' you should at least include price.

  14. Richard Wharram


    Why would you choose this rather than a Macbook Air though ? Surely it will chug in comparison with a HDD ?

  15. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    'Is it such a crime?'


  16. bex

    hardly wort a review

    Just a slight boost from the one I bought earlier this year, Waste of the internet

  17. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward


    Expensive and easily bettered on price and spec.....but sell it in a couple of years and large chunk of the 999 will return. By the PC option and it wont. That's one of the main reasons I like apple kit, it holds its value because its desirable and fairly (qualified) robust.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      'Holds its value' needs some qualification - I assume you are not suggesting that selling one of the two year old models of these now would fund the difference between this and a similarly specced Dell (minus the sale value of a two year old Dell) - or are you?

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Can you provide some figures? Would be genuinely interested to compare the sale / resale values of similarly configured two year old models from Apple, Dell, ASUS, Lenovo, Sony etc.

  18. James 51 Silver badge

    Low resolution screen, no dedicated GPU, too few usb ports and no usb 3. If the price was a lot lower these might be forgiveable.

    What's it like running Ubuntu?

  19. uhuznaa

    Still not bad

    The fact is that this is "entry level" for Apple products, not for laptops. If you compare the MBP with similar offerings from others, it's not overpriced. And if you factor in the fact that Apple hardware keeps its value very good over the years its outright cheap in the long run (I have a MPB from 2009 and could still sell it for half its price when it was new -- try that with other laptops).

    Anyway, these days a Macbook Air would be the better choice if you don't need the optical drive, a large HD or more than 4 Gigs of RAM. IF you need those though, the 13" MBP is still a very sensible choice. And if you're using this thing to earn money ("Pro") for a few years the upfront cost is just irrelevant.

    1. Craigness

      PCs lose less value

      PCs may lose more value as a per cent of the original cost* but they lose less value over all. You've lost 50% in 2 years of ownership of a mac but you can beat the specs of this mac for less than half its cost if you buy a pc. On price and specs there is no comparison. If you compare the functionality of win7 and osx they match up pretty well. So all your money really buys you is some aluminium and a glowing apple logo.

      *they don't.

      1. uhuznaa

        "You've lost 50% in 2 years of ownership of a mac but you can beat the specs of this mac for less than half its cost if you buy a pc."

        But you can't. You don't get similar (or even better) PC laptops for less than half its cost, really. They cost very much the same or more.

  20. Anonymous Coward

    Sorry, Apple loses more value than PC?

    Who are you kidding? You can pick up a 2 year old MBP for perhaps 10-20% off their original list price... the ones that are dirt cheap have probably been abused.

    I'm on a second-hand MacBook (the last plastic one) and for the price I paid for it I'm very happy... Granted, the fan sometimes goes mental, but then again you haven't heard the Toshiba or Samsung laptops when they are running full tilt either... they are just as noisy.

    The spec for this 13" MBP is decent. It is *not* entry-level spec, and never will be. That's what the MacBook (God rest its soul) *was* for.

    1. Craigness

      Weighted average

      If you lose 20% off the price of a mac then you lose the equivalent of 60% of the price of an equivalently-specced pc. But PCs don't lose that much value in 2 years, so macs lose more value. You're looking at return on capital rather than total cost of ownership.

      PCs lose so little value that I ended up buying a new one when I'd have been happy with a 2nd hand. The price difference was negligible.

    2. csumpi

      Yes, it does.

      If you paid 10-20% off for a year old laptop, you paid too much.

      I've sold my old Macbook Pro (similar to the one reviewed here) and my old Samsung laptop, each after about a year of use.

      I've got about 60% of the original price of both. Except, because the MBP was a lot more expensive, in a year I lost $600 on the Macbook Pro, but only $300 on the Samsung.

      Both laptops were in perfect shape.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Reading & comprehension...

        2 year-old. Not year-old. That means it's two years old, not one.

  21. clocKwize

    For a start don't be bias just because its from Apple and you HATE apple fanbois.

    I fucking hate iPhones, iPods, iPads, iMacs and anything else with an i on the start. All overpriced and ok, but nothing special.

    I'd never have tried a mac book pro or air if my company didn't buy me one. Having said that, they are fucking amazing to work on, the operating system once you get over all the weird/pretty ui and just use it like you want, is great.

    Build quality is amazing, I've now had a MBP 15" and an MBA 11" - both are the best computers I've ever had. Things never go wrong, it always just works as expected, it doesn't feel like you might break it by dropping it, we've had someone knock a bottle of water over a MBP, about 300ml from a 500ml bottle, and we turned it upside down and left it to drip out for a few minutes, wiped it off and carried on, it didn't ever crash it or shut it down..

    If you want a really high spec computer, then don't spend your money on a MB but if you are realistic about your usage of said computer, I'm a developer, I don't need high power spec or graphics, i need a decent amount of ram, a dooable processor and I need it to work without any hicups. which it does fine. my MBA has 4gb of ram, which isn't great nowadays, but the systems runs smooth no matter what i do on it, no matter how many things i have open, it just works. 4gb on a windows pc just about keeps the operating system happy.

    If I was to buy my own laptop, I maybe wouldn't go for a MB, they are expensive, no doubt about it. But if you get over the fact you won't get as high spec for your money, its clearly worth it.

    penguin because its in there somewhere.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Thanks for signing up today to add to the forum noise.

  22. PhilBack

    They are good.

    If money's not an issue (and if you run your own business, 1K is really ridiculous pocket change), that's really a great box.

    2 USB? So what, it is hooked to a 7-port stackable USB hub here and there is no single problem. You can stack hubs on hubs for "as many ports as you need."

    I've got a MBP 13 from 2 generations before and it is really a pleasure to work with it.

    Mine lives into a Henge dock and is hooked on a 24" display.

    There are plenty of other PCs with XP, Vista, ... and Linux Mint over here. Needless to say, most work happens on the MBP13". And I was a PC guy. That says a lot.

    Take me down as well :-)

  23. Hillman_Hunter

    I understand why this is not cheaper, that just not Apples market, let Dell and lenovo etc fight it out down there,

    At a thousand quid i dont understand why its not better specified.

  24. Mick Sheppard


    I've run Powerbooks, Powerbook Pros, Macbook Pros for the past 12 years. They are only expensive if you only look a raw specs. If you look at the whole package they aren't.

    I recently challenged our IT department to find me a laptop with the same specification for less money. I wanted the same battery life, the same screen resolution and quality, the same graphics chipset. They couldn't. The killer was battery life and screen quality.

    Its all about horses for courses. I run a Macbook Pro because I can and I like what they offer. I could buy a cheaper PC laptop but I would be compromising in some form or other. Of course the rabid anti-Apple zealots will just call me a fanboi or worse. Shame that.

    1. N2 Silver badge

      And if you did...

      buy a cheaper PC based laptop, you have the suffrage of Windows unless you install Linux

      I have the 2.7 and it ticks all my boxes

    2. Fintan

      im sure your MBP is great too.

      Dell vostro 3350 - £750

      (intel i5 2.3Ghz dual core hyperthreaded, backlit keyboard,1366x768 res, ATI Radeon HD6490 with intel graphics to reduce power usage, 8 cell battery, USB 3.0 blutooth etc etc)

      8GB ram - £35

      256GB Crucial M4 SSD - £260

      So for just 45 pounds more than the MBP i have not just the exact spec, but a considerably higher spec, that will run win7 for 8+ hours, has a boot up time from cold to clicking the start menu of 19 seconds and shuts down in 5 seconds

      But you wanted an exact spec provided by apple so i can see why you wouldnt want 8gb of ram or an SSD.

      But what you got is nice too....

  25. The New Turtle

    I've had one of the original unibody Macbooks for almost 3 years now, and as the review says, this is more of the same, but mildly tweaked, and trailing the technology curve in typical apple fashion. But I've been looking to see what might be a good replacement (because Macs for science use are poor for productivity and a dead end for specialist software - fanbois, make of that what you will). And This hasn't exactly been a paragon of reliability or stability either, needing a new MoBo and the OS reinstalling every 12 months or less to remain stable and quick.

    In terms of hardware, as people have noted, I can get a similar or more powerful PC for about half the price, and there's a good chance that, running windows, it won't get bogged down the way the Macbook does if I have, say, 6 spreadsheets and a couple of word documents open at the same time. But the things that the Macbook does well is that it is small and light enough to carry acceptably, that 13" screen is 1280 X 1024, which means that you can do real work even if you have to squint hard, and the trackpad makes mouseless working tolerable (even though it causes cramp after a couple of hours). And the case is very very nice, and probably the best single feature of the hardware.

    So I have a real conundrum - do I replace it with something cheaper running a more useful OS in slightly sub-optimal hardware, or do I go for shiny with the iffy Apple OS (now even iffier with Lion)?

    One more thing.

    On that £990 price, you need to add 3 years Applecare warranty (essential, I'd say, considering the poor reliability of Apple hardware) if you have any expectations of using the machine for work. You're looking at a realistic starting price of £1300, which is a real professional price, regardless of hardware and OS. That suddenly makes a Dell, top end Acer or Lenovo look a lot more attractive.

  26. the-it-slayer

    What, and you'd rather have a Dell dumbo replace your Motherboard every 6 months?

    Look people. The tiresome old PC vs Mac will live on until the geek crowd let go of their need for control. I was never a fan of Apple until I used them. I just get the sense the antiApple crowd do it because it looks cool. No it does not. Take a slice of realism and no non-sense approach here.

    I personally would rather pay for quality products in any sector. Especially when you look at several hundreds of pounds,

    I had a top of the range Dell XPS 13" laptop. Great design that could of taken Dell into a different market and catchup with Apple's appreciation for design and simplicity. The bigget flaw with it though? A flawed motherboard. These just had a huge failure with the design, especially the GPU overheating even under normal use. All I got was replacement refurbed motherboards that had the same flaw every time. I ended up selling it to some gullible fellow with xtea warranty so they didn't get stuck.

    I then turned to Apple and my MacBook of the same nature of this one from almost 3 years ago is still running smoothly, no major issues, upgraded the RAM for 30 quid and should last me another 3. How many Dell's, HP's etc end up on the scrap heap after 1-2 years because of poor design? Loads and I've seen my fair share as a school technician.

This topic is closed for new posts.

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019